National Academy Of Sciences Debunks Sacred Warmy Myth

Tom Sweetnam

Platinum Member
Aug 27, 2014
3,780
989
955
8000' up in the san juan mountain foothills
It turns out that temperature changes (one degree warmer in a hundred years) on the Pacific coast, were caused by natural phenomenon, not by any man made activity. This has long been one of the most sacred tenets of warmy myth, now debunked by a National Academy of Sciences study. I can hardly wait to see how warmy histrionics artists try to bullshit their way out of this one.

West Coast warming blamed on natural causes not human activity - CBS News
 
Atmospheric controls on northeast Pacific temperature variability and change 1900 2012

Significance

Northeast Pacific coastal warming since 1900 is often ascribed to anthropogenic greenhouse forcing, whereas multidecadal temperature changes are widely interpreted in the framework of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), which responds to regional atmospheric dynamics. This study uses several independent data sources to demonstrate that century-long warming around the northeast Pacific margins, like multidecadal variability, can be primarily attributed to changes in atmospheric circulation. It presents a significant reinterpretation of the region’s recent climate change origins, showing that atmospheric conditions have changed substantially over the last century, that these changes are not likely related to historical anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing, and that dynamical mechanisms of interannual and multidecadal temperature variability can also apply to observed century-long trends.

Maybe. And, then again, if the temperature does not go down with a change in wind pattern, then these researchers failed to look for the causitive agent in the winds shifting in the first place.
 
Atmospheric controls on northeast Pacific temperature variability and change 1900 2012

Significance

Northeast Pacific coastal warming since 1900 is often ascribed to anthropogenic greenhouse forcing, whereas multidecadal temperature changes are widely interpreted in the framework of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), which responds to regional atmospheric dynamics. This study uses several independent data sources to demonstrate that century-long warming around the northeast Pacific margins, like multidecadal variability, can be primarily attributed to changes in atmospheric circulation. It presents a significant reinterpretation of the region’s recent climate change origins, showing that atmospheric conditions have changed substantially over the last century, that these changes are not likely related to historical anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing, and that dynamical mechanisms of interannual and multidecadal temperature variability can also apply to observed century-long trends.

Maybe. And, then again, if the temperature does not go down with a change in wind pattern, then these researchers failed to look for the causitive agent in the winds shifting in the first place.
Do you recon that the thousands upon thousands of wind turbines on this planet effect atmospheric circulation? Even a teensy bit? :dunno:
 
Not a fraction as much as the many high-rises we have built. But, in recompense, we've cut down a lot of trees...
 

Forum List

Back
Top