Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Nate made a good bet....
Wonderful sig line
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nate made a good bet....
Yes, as did the Obama campaign. Romney's campaign should have done that too, and Willard wouldn't have been shell-shocked.Nate made a good bet....
No, Nate conducted solid analysis based on data.
Yes, as did the Obama campaign. Romney's campaign should have done that too, and Willard wouldn't have been shell-shocked.Nate made a good bet....
No, Nate conducted solid analysis based on data.
I wonder, will conservatives mock Nate Silver next election? Or will they actually trust his data?
I wonder, will conservatives mock Nate Silver next election? Or will they actually trust his data?
I'm betting that next time, liberals will deify Silver, and proclaim that because he was right this time, he will certainly be right next time.
Nate's real strength isn't his forecasting system as much as it's his gift for explaining what the data is, and isn't, telling us. All his analysis derives from publicly available data.
Silver was 92% correct on Senate races (missed AK, NV, & CO) and 95% on Governor races (missed IL & FL). But his record is even more impressive than this
In 56 of 73 races for Senate/Governor, Silver assigned a 90% probability or higher that he was correct. He got all of them right. This included some tricky races including the Feingold upset, the crowded Senate race in Florida, and the close race in PA.
But even on the races that he had less confidence in, Silver delivered. He was 71% in races he assigned an 80% probability to, and 70% in toss ups (50-80%).
And on the 2010 election, I found this
Silver was 92% correct on Senate races (missed AK, NV, & CO) and 95% on Governor races (missed IL & FL). But his record is even more impressive than this
In 56 of 73 races for Senate/Governor, Silver assigned a 90% probability or higher that he was correct. He got all of them right. This included some tricky races including the Feingold upset, the crowded Senate race in Florida, and the close race in PA.
But even on the races that he had less confidence in, Silver delivered. He was 71% in races he assigned an 80% probability to, and 70% in toss ups (50-80%).
Pacific Northwest-Coast Bias » Blog Archive » Grading Nate Silvers Election Predictions
It's hilarious that you actually believe that.
Meanwhile, RCP has Obama at +68 and intrade has Obama at a 2-1 favorite.
You really stepped in it after the first debate, House Gimp, and it's all coming back to haunt you.
You're effed now.
Pointing out how totally fuckin' WRONG certain wingnuts on here were hasn't gotten old yet.
Clearly, Silver is doing something right. I don't know how you can argue against that
Clearly, Silver is doing something right. I don't know how you can argue against that
Silver just analyzes data. Basically, he said that if the state polls were wrong, then he was wrong. And if the state polls were right, he was right.
It isn't rocket science. Though he's very good at what he does.
What I can't understand is the desperate need of some to denigrate him, call him "boi" in the most derisive fashion, as if acknowledging the guy is smart and good at what he does is somehow a violation of some rightwingnut code.
It's fun watching a dying snake writhe on the ground.
It is...
Please be here wednesday...
It's fun watching a dying snake writhe on the ground.
It is...
Please be here wednesday...
We've all been here. Where are you?
It is...
Please be here wednesday...
We've all been here. Where are you?
3 Wednesdays have gone by now