What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Nancy Pelosi should be charged....

j-mac

Nuthin' but the truth
Joined
Oct 8, 2013
Messages
13,011
Reaction score
8,092
Points
1,140
Location
South Carolina

Sixties Fan

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
31,379
Reaction score
4,252
Points
1,240
When Nancy Pelosi ripped up Trump's Sotu speech she committed a felony under 18 USC 2071...Was she raided?
That was her copy to rip. He did not say anything against it at the time, but you are trying to make an issue of it with all the documents found at Mar O Lago now
 

1srelluc

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2021
Messages
13,807
Reaction score
18,740
Points
2,268
Location
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia
I read where they planned on printing her copy the next go-round on Tyvek paper.....Sadly the election was stolen.
 

Rye Catcher

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2019
Messages
11,471
Reaction score
6,793
Points
940
When Nancy Pelosi ripped up Trump's Sotu speech she committed a felony under 18 USC 2071...Was she raided?
LOL, there were numerous copies of the SOTU Speech, and this is not the original. No harm, no foul.
 

billyerock123

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2021
Messages
574
Reaction score
168
Points
88
When Nancy Pelosi ripped up Trump's Sotu speech she committed a felony under 18 USC 2071...Was she raided?
Are you nuts… really are you nuts a state of the union is not a government document that had to be stored … are you really this stupid
 

Magnus

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Messages
4,415
Reaction score
2,713
Points
1,938
When Nancy Pelosi ripped up Trump's Sotu speech she committed a felony under 18 USC 2071...Was she raided?
LOL I love all these threads. But..but... Clinton did it. Obama did it. Nancy did it... Why is it only our orange Fuhrer getting punished!!

You idiots who chanted for Hillary to be locked up are now horrified that your der leader had an FBI visit. A visit mind you that followed the full letter of the law. A visit that resulted in seizing classified materials that Rump had no business stashing at his house.

Classified materials that you trumptards claim that Clinton and Obama secreted away and should be punished. But don't like the same rule to apply to your orange Fuhrer.

And you idiots wonder why no one takes you seriously. :itsok:
 

HaShev

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2009
Messages
15,288
Reaction score
5,003
Points
335
That was her copy to rip. He did not say anything against it at the time, but you are trying to make an issue of it with all the documents found at Mar O Lago now
You just inadvertantly admitted those documents were Trumps copies and he could do anything with them.
In actuallity forget all the missinformation and propaganda stick to what's factual:
Fact: any high classified document is never left in folders in boxes, they are collected back then and there of any briefing/reading and never leave a room, so they would not be in any archive, they are held that tightly.
Fact: all former presidents are allowed to hold documents in archives in an office library, Trumps office happens to be at his resort where he has secret service agents, and very tight security probably saving taxpayers money to have his library archive there than at another location. They had no issue with his office storage except suggesting and requesting a second lock-note you are not born with the knowledge of what security the feds would want, you have ask or be told by them what is acceptable and that is what transpired and was learned, that evwrything was fine as they got a second lock, once again, thwre is Secret Service, there are employees and security is tight.
Fact: nothing out of the ordinary from any other presidents processes, in fact you should be asking for the WH logs Obama quickly took into archives to hide from the public, there's very damaging evidence there like of Kislyaks 24 visits to the WH, which is important regarding Obamas use of a Russian spy to help him create a narrative to allow them to spy on his political party's opposition And eventually use the foreign adversary aid to manipulate our presidentual & mid term elections.
At first Ben Carson the then front runner was the target to be spied on, then when Trump took the lead he became the victim of Obamas spying strategy.
espionage: the practice of spying or using spies to obtain information about the plans and activities especially of a foreign government or a "competing" company
SO when DEMS are in hot water for illegal acts their strategy is to always (and I do mean always) ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS accuse their opponent of the crimes they themselves have been doing (hence accusing Trump of Obamas Russia aided Election manipulation) That's why the espionage wording on the warrant makes no sense and neither does grabbing a coctail napkin that's not on their seizure list. What? Do they plan on using Chinese research of tayloring a disease to his specific dna? Then wth?
 
Last edited:

Sixties Fan

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
31,379
Reaction score
4,252
Points
1,240
You just inadvertantly admitted those documents were Trumps copies and he could do anything with them.
In actuallity forget all the missinformation and propaganda stick to what's factual:
Fact: any high classified document is never left in folders in boxes, they are collected back then and there of any briefing/reading and never leave a room, so they would not be in any archive, they are held that tightly.
Fact: all former presidents are allowed to hold documents in archives in an office library, Trumps office happens to be at his resort where he has secret service agents, and very tight security probably saving taxpayers money to have his library archive there than at another location. They had no issue with his office storage except suggesting and requesting a second lock-note you are not born with the knowledge of what security the feds would want, you have ask or be told by them what is acceptable and that is what transpired and was learned, that evwrything was fine as they got a second lock, once again, thwre is Secret Service, there are employees and security is tight.
Fact: nothing out of the ordinary from any other presidents processes, in fact you should be asking for the WH logs Obama quickly took into archives to hide from the public, there's very damaging evidence there like of Kislyaks 24 visits to the WH, which is important regarding Obamas use of a Russian spy to help him create a narrative to allow them to spy on his political party's opposition.
At first Ben Carson the then front runner was the target to be spied on, then when Trump took the lead he became the victim of Obamas spying strategy.
espionage: the practice of spying or using spies to obtain information about the plans and activities especially of a foreign government or a "competing" company
SO when DEMS are in hot water for illegal acts their strategy is to always (and I do mean always) ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS accuse their opponent of the crimes they themselves have been doing. That's why the espuonage wording on the warrant makes no sense and neither does grabbing a coctail napkin that's not on their seizure list. What? Do they plan on using Chinese research of tayloring a disease to his specific dna? Then wth?
No, the declassified documents in Mar O Lago were not copies, or he would have said that, shown proof that he did copy them.


ALL the Congress had a copy of Trump's speech that day. It was not a crime to tear, write, doodle or anything else anyone wanted to do with it, even give it away to anyone.
 

HaShev

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2009
Messages
15,288
Reaction score
5,003
Points
335
No, the declassified documents in Mar O Lago were not copies, or he would have said that, shown proof that he did copy them.


ALL the Congress had a copy of Trump's speech that day. It was not a crime to tear, write, doodle or anything else anyone wanted to do with it, even give it away to anyone.
You make as much sense as the DMV asking for a certified copy of your birth certificate instead of the original birth certificate copied at birth that people hold. THEY ARE ALL COPIES.
Trumps speech is an original with many copies handed out, documents that Pres, house, senate (Executive and Legistlative branch) receive are copies too in the same manner.
Also Trump doesn't pack those boxes, and it's not beneath someone to stash something in them to later further do their plant scheme (Schumers warning. Along with past actions ends up being evidence of such behavior)
How else would an informant know what's in the box and where they are if it's supposed to be classified, that would make them violate many laws and impossible to know unless you put them there or were tracking where they were put for nafarious reasons
 

Sixties Fan

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
31,379
Reaction score
4,252
Points
1,240
You make as much sense as the DMV asking for a certified copy of your birth certificate instead of the original birth certificate copied at birth that people hold. THEY ARE ALL COPIES.
Trumps speech is an original with many copies handed out, documents that Pres, house, senate (Executive and Legistlative branch) receive are copies too in the same manner.
Also Trump doesn't pack those boxes, and it's not beneath someone to stash something in them to later further do their plant scheme (Schumers warning. Along with past actions ends up being evidence of such behavior)
How else would an informant know what's in the box and where they are if it's supposed to be classified, that would make them violate many laws and impossible to know unless you put them there or were tracking where they were put for nafarious reasons
If the ones in Mar O Lago were just copies, the National Archives would have let him have them and not requested to have them back.
 

HaShev

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2009
Messages
15,288
Reaction score
5,003
Points
335
If the ones in Mar O Lago were just copies, the National Archives would have let him have them and not requested to have them back.
Maybe an analogy of how gang metality works will help you see a reflection of your triggers:
Suppose you are a Cubs Fan and were excited at the homerun race Sosa was having with McGwire. You surely expecting Sosa to break the homerun record before McGwire and sure he'll end up with the most. But McGwire busts your bubble and your home teams spirit, so your trigger is Mark McGwire, you want to find his
Cheating, you want to investigate his
Steroids and talk about the Culture of Performance-Enhancing Drugs, but you do not dare speak of Sosa doing them, nor will you advocate investigating Sosa's use. You protect Sosa for the very thing you would accuse and catch McGwire for, that is called selective outrage, hypocracy, selective application of the law, flawed group behavior, rules for thee but not for me, poor sportsmanship, sore loser syndrome, illogical behavior, irrational, unjust.
The Dem politicians claim to understand this in the minority community treatment in the justice system, of how rich get privelages while the poor or minorities classes get a different treatment and set of rules, however this is the very thing Dem politicians are known for, being above those rules it sets for those they call irredeemable and deplorables all of which are disposable in a reset of an overpopulated failed society, hence they want to purge those they claim to protect, and start a new society, the ideas which you see failed today is basically they want to rule over the hell they build with most of you as their slaves (without realizing you are all slaves to them already).
 

Sixties Fan

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
31,379
Reaction score
4,252
Points
1,240
Maybe an analogy of how gang metality works will help you see a reflection of your triggers:
Suppose you are a Cubs Fan and were excited at the homerun race Sosa was having with McGwire. You surely expecting Sosa to break the homerun record before McGwire and sure he'll end up with the most. But McGwire busts your bubble and your home teams spirit, so your trigger is Mark McGwire, you want to find his
Cheating, you want to investigate his
Steroids and talk about the Culture of Performance-Enhancing Drugs, but you do not dare speak of Sosa doing them, nor will you advocate investigating Sosa's use. You protect Sosa for the very thing you would accuse and catch McGwire for, that is called selective outrage, hypocracy, selective application of the law, flawed group behavior, rules for thee but not for me, poor sportsmanship, sore loser syndrome, illogical behavior, irrational, unjust.
The Dem politicians claim to understand this in the minority community treatment in the justice system, of how rich get privelages while the poor or minorities classes get a different treatment and set of rules, however this is the very thing Dem politicians are known for, being above those rules it sets for those they call irredeemable and deplorables all of which are disposable in a reset of an overpopulated failed society, hence they want to purge those they claim to protect, and start a new society, the ideas which you see failed today is basically they want to rule over the hell they build with most of you as their slaves (without realizing you are all slaves to them already).
So, in other words, you are trying to turn a mere tear of a copy which all Republicans and Democrats and Media had on the day of that speech and are going to continue to attempt to link that to Trump not disclosing that he had those documents, the fact that he had not declassified most of the documents he brought to Mar O Lago, as so many were missing from the National Archives, the organization which asked for them to be returned to begin with, as there was NO receipt or document at all anywhere which showed that he had declassified anything in those 35 boxes.
 

TroglocratsRdumb

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2017
Messages
26,822
Reaction score
25,923
Points
2,415
Pelosi was drunk at the time
pelosydrunkagainhfffgg.gif
pelosipsycho.jpg
 

HaShev

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2009
Messages
15,288
Reaction score
5,003
Points
335
So, in other words, you are trying to turn a mere tear of a copy which all Republicans and Democrats and Media had on the day of that speech and are going to continue to attempt to link that to Trump not disclosing that he had those documents, the fact that he had not declassified most of the documents he brought to Mar O Lago, as so many were missing from the National Archives, the organization which asked for them to be returned to begin with, as there was NO receipt or document at all anywhere which showed that he had declassified anything in those 35 boxes.
It's cute how you still think it's about the legally stored documents he got the oK for, just because your news source is smokescreening everything else and is leading you to their narrative used as a hail mary for the midterms.
A little hint: do you know of any network not even Fox news that has discussed
the Hunter Biden docs the justice dept or FBI was supposed to hand over at the deadline night before the raid?
Well did they hand it over by the deadline or not, why don't we know?
 

Sixties Fan

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
31,379
Reaction score
4,252
Points
1,240
It's cute how you still think it's about the legally stored documents he got the oK for, just because your news source is smokescreening everything else and is leading you to their narrative used as a hail mary for the midterms.
A little hint: do you know of any network not even Fox news that has discussed
the Hunter Biden docs the justice dept or FBI was supposed to hand over at the deadline night before the raid?
Well did they hand it over by the deadline or not, why don't we know?
When Trump can show the receipts for all the documents which were at Mar O Lago, then we can talk.

Until then......

And I do not answer a change of topic, which is what the rest of your post is about.

Stay focused. Trump and all the documents he had to return to the National Archives.
 

HaShev

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2009
Messages
15,288
Reaction score
5,003
Points
335
When Trump can show the receipts for all the documents which were at Mar O Lago, then we can talk.

Until then......

And I do not answer a change of topic, which is what the rest of your post is about.

Stay focused. Trump and all the documents he had to return to the National Archives.
You mean when Obama shows his receipt for all 30 million docs he took?
Suddenly you dems are aware of receipts, but ask to produce them to locate a box of ballots and suddenly you no comprende or in the words of Pesaki
"circle around to it"


We're still waiting Psaki, any time you wanna circle back to us feel free.
 

Leweman

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
5,571
Reaction score
1,749
Points
250
If Nancy were actually alive and sober she should be in jail.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$55.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top