protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 59,730
- 20,265
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #41
YOU SAY that > "The guy who originally posted it admitted he doctored it." So what ? That doesn't prove anything. Anybody can say anything. Somebody could say the president of the US smokes cocaine. That doesn't mean he does. Many posts ago I suggested you provide evidence. It never arrived.There has been ZERO proof in this thread, form you or anyone else, that the photo was doctored. And the main point that you are dodging from by continuing to talk about the photo, is the point of Black guys robbing stores. THAT's what matters. Not you stupid photo. And if you feel some need to fight in here, just to preserve some ego points, that's YOUR problem, not mine.You know damn well that what I said after that renders that whole part to be moot. You can stop pretending now. If you have anything to say about my second part of the post, (the large number of Black guys who DO ROB A STORE), let's hear it. Otherwise, I have no time for phonieness.
Why yes, I did notice your clumsy evasion when you realized you had been touting a ludicrous fabrication that is only believable if you already believe the worst of young black men as a group. You can stop projecting your own "phonieness" on me though; your strong demand for more evidence was hardly rendered moot by a hasty thought exercise beginning in "Perhaps..."
Don't pretend that if I had posted a doctored photo in here, that you would allow that shit to carry any substance in this discussion.
I shouldn't even still be discussing this with you. I finished with it 2 posts ago.
"Zero" proof? Look, the fakeness of that photo is not even in dispute anymore. The guy who originally posted it admitted he doctored it. I don't know how many times I have to hold your hand in front of your face before you'll admit you have five fingers...
And the reason you're still discussing "my" stupid photo (that you posted) is because you've exposed the flimsiness of your own position. The only way someone could seriously deny that black people aren't oppressed in this country is if they cling to a racist caricature of them as violent, selfish, and stupid. And like your little picture, it 's a caricature that never holds up to any serious scrutiny.
And you are totally WRONG with your stupid claim that >> "The only way someone could seriously deny that black people aren't oppressed in this country is if they cling to a racist caricature of them as violent, selfish, and stupid." FALSE!! Showing that Black people in America aren't oppressed is the easiest thing in the world. For 50 years, they've had AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, putting them (illegally) at the front of every job hiring line, every job promotion line, every college admission line, every college financial aid line, and pushing Whites to the back of all these lines. What is impossible to do, is to show that Whites are not oppressed, when they have been the victims of all this racial discrimination against them.
You are everyone's weird aunt on Facebook who shares the fake news story that Obama is trying to change the law so he can run for a third term, and refuses to admit it's obviously false no matter what anyone shows you. And you expect me to have a rational discussion with you about whether affirmative action has reversed racism? No thanks.
NO, I DON'T EXPECT you to have a rational discussion about whether affirmative action has reversed racism.
There is no need for that. It has been an established FACT for 50 years.
And I I DON'T EXPECT you to have a rational discussion about affirmative action in general, because all those who support it, never engage in rational discussions about it. Instead, they cowardly cut and run away from that, like you're doing right now.