Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 55,211
- 16,850
- 2,250
If you take a look at the warrant, it clearly states that they have the authority to unlock the phone with Lindel's fingerprint or face.
If Lindel was 'detained' until he gave up the phone, that's within the scope of the warrant. Lindell's consent for the data to be accessed by the FBI isn't required.
And Lidell's claim that the warrant was in bad faith because those who applied and served the warrant 'were aware that Mr. Lindell depended on his cell phone' is meaningless pseudo-legal gibberish.