MYPillow Wants FBI To Give Back His Phone


If you take a look at the warrant, it clearly states that they have the authority to unlock the phone with Lindel's fingerprint or face.

If Lindel was 'detained' until he gave up the phone, that's within the scope of the warrant. Lindell's consent for the data to be accessed by the FBI isn't required.

And Lidell's claim that the warrant was in bad faith because those who applied and served the warrant 'were aware that Mr. Lindell depended on his cell phone' is meaningless pseudo-legal gibberish.
 
If you take a look at the warrant, it clearly states that they have the authority to unlock the phone with Lindel's fingerprint or face.

If Lindel was 'detained' until he gave up the phone, that's within the scope of the warrant. Lindell's consent for the data to be accessed by the FBI isn't required.

And Lidell's claim that the warrant was in bad faith because those who applied and served the warrant 'were aware that Mr. Lindell depended on his cell phone' is meaningless pseudo-legal gibberish.
If they haven't copied the hard drive already, they don't deserve to be employed.
 
So you're equating the serving of a lawful warrant as a 'thug robbing you on the street'?

No, bonehead, I'm equating the following around of a private citizen until you can corral him in a drive-thru burger line to swarm him in a big public scene for the media to take his phone which his company depends on, to take it with no good reason, no charges, no accusations of any crime, to keep it indefinitely at gunpoint for no good reason scaring away business partners hoping to put a guy out of business because you don't like his political views and to protect your own unsavory ones from him, to be outright police state, KGB-style, corn pop thuggery and FASCISM, and another blatant over-the-top leftwing abuse of government power shown over and again by the Biddum-Garland brwnshirt Marxists to be wholly criminal and its gonna be getting busted up in just a few more months.
 

Forum List

Back
Top