" Crazed From The Heat And Desert Attire "
* Not Playing Nice *
It means submission to God which, when you think about it, is the core of each of the Abrahamic faiths. Is that a bad thing?
An assertion that i slam is synonymous with submission to gawd is equivalent with abdicating to edicts of the qurayshism creed , which is pretentious and preposterous .
The term islam is an infinitive meaning " to submit ", while the term muslim is a noun meaning " one who submits " ; each term is generic and one may practice i slam in a bdsm dungeon by being a mu slim to a dominatrix .
The definitions are absurd , circular , reasoning , espousing those who submit to submission , abdicating to authority , in deed , espousing the prostration of ones self , under foot , before the lofted rear end of those affront guided by the pompous arrogance of a pious hats .
Why does the kabaah have the semblance of a shiny anus ?
Further , practicing idolatry while denying idolatry is ridiculous , and none loved mu ham mad more than himself and the criticism of christians who venerate isa is absolutely ridiculous , considering the veneration of mu ham mad , as flawless perfection , is even greater and certainly more vicious .
The intrinsic elements of the ideology are based in hisbah that emphasizes abdication to authority , as subjects , as demand for complicity as dhimmi - the dim wit , the protected ignoramus - to the pretentious supremacy of arab cultural hegemony .
Even now tay yip yap ear dog again is corrupting the populous of turn key as the popularity of arrogance grows among its fictional ishmaelism majority , where democracy becomes tyranny for despotism through bandwagon majority .
Kemalism - Wikipedia
Populism (Turkish: halkçılık) is defined as a social revolution aimed to transfer the political power to citizenship. ... In the Ottoman society "the people" (the correct term for the period was "subjects") side (submits) to autocracy (Ottoman dynasty), theocracy (Caliphate) and feudalism (tribal leaders). Kemalism moved the orientation of political power towards the best interest of the "general public" (general public = citizens of the country, common citizens, citizenship).
However, Kemalist nationalism aimed to shift the political legitimacy from autocracy (by the Ottoman dynasty), theocracy (based in the Ottoman Caliphate), and feudalism (tribal leaders) to the active participation of its citizenry, the Turks. Kemalist social content wanted to establish the value of Turkish citizenship.
* Autonomy Of Others *
On Sharia...it is complex. It depends on how it is interpreted and where. For many Muslims it is simply guidance on how to live a pious life, much like Jewish religious law is to Jews. The problem from a human rights perspective, is when it is part of a nation’s law, particularly its penal codes. Muslin majority nations vary in how (if at all) Sharia is used in their legal systems. For example I don’t see a problem with sharia compliant banking, dietary restrictions, charitable giving etc.
Where there are problems are in countries where Sharia is used to legitimize domestic abuse, silence rape victims or prevent a woman from excersizing her rights, persecuting homosexuals or preventing a person from leaving the religion.
The condemnation of usury is a good creed , but investigation into the banking systems run by qurayshism or fictional ishmaelism adherents simply reflects that the means of usury has been modified to fees rather than accrued interest .
Controlling ones own dietary restrictions does not have anything to do with the dietary proclivities of some other , but that does not stop fictional ishmaelism adherents from violating non aggression principles to dictate it .
That charity is a good creed , using it as a justification to redeem the egregious elements of the fictional ishmaelism institution seems to be an underlying theme .