Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now you showed how messed up you are about this as PV dishonest boy writes:
"AGW is climate change."
No, it is about additional CO2 effecting the planetary heat budget (warm forcing) and the postulated never seen "Hot spot" and large never seen Positive Feedback loop.
This clearly shows that it is the SUN/Ocean Dynamo driving the weather and temperature spikes which is NATURAL warming events.
AGW = "Anthropogenic Global Warming".
Of COURSE it is "Climate Change".
Don't you believe that H2O is a greenhouse gas? Hmmm. That's an astoundingly basic concept.
If you warm the planet you increase water vapor which adds to the warming through H2O.
That's pretty simple.
Can I ask why you don't ever go with legitimate science resources? You know, by ACTUAL scientists who specialize in this topic?
Where is the Positive Feedback Loop? H20 doesn't hang around in the air long which is elementary knowledge.
Many AGW scientists commonly ignore the Sun/Ocean dominance because that would make their CO2 look weak and irrelevant and WHY I don't take them seriously for that reason.
The key is that excess H2O doesn't remain long in the atmosphere, but it does remain a SHORT while which is why it is a FEEDBACK.
NASA
58 years is actually quite fine for entire data sets. But for one individual data POINT it isn't.
I wish I could explain how statistics and large-scale concepts like AGW work to you folks but I apparently can't.
Any SINGLE TEMPERATURE station is NOT going to show you AGW. In the real world of science there is a lot of noise in data. And individual points do NOT provide you significant insight.
I wish you all knew more about this stuff. At the very least you'd see how uninformed you sound when you post.
You have no idea what Navier/Stokes equations are, do you?
You're not going to be able to explain physics with statistics
... that's where you've stumbled and bloodied your nose ... statistics is just a tool, a mathematical construct, useful in many ways ... but it's not physics .
.. and large scale concepts start with the large scale circulation
I've already discussed this you.
That's the single most stupid thing I've read in a long time.
Especially when one wants to also discuss fluid dynamics. Stochastics are integral to almost all the physical science, ESPECIALLY relating to gases and fluids.
Wow. I never realized you knew so very little about physics.
HILARIOUS! Stats and stochastic processes are EXACTLY understood with statistics. LOL
You need to learn more than just the phrase "Navier-Stokes".
LOL
Temperature data that includes readings based on pressure systems rather than CO2. Pressure systems that allow warmer gulf air into northern regions, then allowing Arctic air to be pulled in from the Arctic. Nothing at all to do with CO2You have clearly never even bothered to read any of the basics of AGW science.
THAT'S CALLED ANECDOTAL DATA.
Again, temperature data is averaged across larger areas than just one point.
No one is forcing you to buy electric cars.1. What is the impact of mining the materials needed to construct the batteries. Getting rid of fossil fuels to mine for more scarce materials seems conflicting.
2. Disposal of the batteries. I've seen some say recycling, but how would that work?
3. Where does the energy come from to charge the batteries? I've seen some say solar, but that doesn't sound realistic. Wouldn't you need enough solar panels to cover Nevada to power the charging stations?
Since the government is trying to force people to buy them, I'd like some answers. I still have doubts that creating and charging batteries will be a cleaner solution to energy needs.
Who said free?These stupid uneducated low information Moon Bats don't have an answer to any of those questions.
They ignore the fact that the rare earths that the batteries are made of are always an ecological disaster to mine and refine.
They, being science deniers, also ignore The First Law of Thermodynamics when it comes to charging the batteries. They don't understand that in physics "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch".
Stochastics? HahahaI've already discussed this you.
That's the single most stupid thing I've read in a long time.
Especially when one wants to also discuss fluid dynamics. Stochastics are integral to almost all the physical science, ESPECIALLY relating to gases and fluids.
Wow. I never realized you knew so very little about physics.
HILARIOUS! Stats and stochastic processes are EXACTLY understood with statistics. LOL
You need to learn more than just the phrase "Navier-Stokes".
LOL
Stochastics? Hahaha
what’s the price ranges?
Temperature data that includes readings based on pressure systems rather than CO2. Pressure systems that allow warmer gulf air into northern regions, then allowing Arctic air to be pulled in from the Arctic. Nothing at all to do with CO2
A average temperature means nothingBoy seems like word salad. You sure you had a point before you randomly assembled the words together?
Maybe you should know the definition of words you useHuh?
A average temperature means nothing
Maybe you should know the definition of words you use
Average temperature means nothing. I get your word stupid. Stochastic anyone? Hahaha you still haven’t figured it outI think we all understand that you don't know the first foreign thing about this topic, but I'm still trying to figure out what your word-mush was all about. What did pressure have to do with it?
Obviously notI do. But then I've been through a physical chemistry class as well as a few additional thermodynamics classes.
