My take on Charlie Kirk

Status
Not open for further replies.
This thread is a hoot. Right wingers bending over backwards to throw their gun nut culture, right wing raised, religious psychopaths over the wall to liberals. LOL. Nice try dumbfucks.
Go Charlie
 
The problem is, he only attended college for 6 months or so and it was some years ago.

If he was indoctrinated, the question would have to be "by whom"?

Over time we may well learn.
He was yet another unstable, young white male, with no strong political affiliations, and easy access to a firearm.

Are there those who will try to exploit this tragedy for hyper-partisan purposes, and demonize half the American people in the process?

Clearly.
 
He was yet another unstable, young white male, with no strong political affiliations, and easy access to a firearm.

Are there those who will try to exploit this tragedy for hyper-partisan purposes, and demonize half the American people in the process?

Clearly.
You think that his trans boyfriend had any influence on him?
 
He was yet another unstable, young white male, with no strong political affiliations, and easy access to a firearm.
and an overdose of media who turn these folks into celebrities while providing them with cover in the form of scapegoating guns.
Are there those who will try to exploit this tragedy for hyper-partisan purposes, and demonize half the American people in the process?
or shift the blame from the perp and who and/or what it was he hated to the weapon, in fact the perp and the media are co-equals in this, eh?
yes
 
Kirk was killed by the son of a white MAGA family who was raised in a pro-MAGA area and state. The bullets in his rifle had memes from right wing corners of the internet written on them. This was right on right and white on white violence.
The above quoted democrat demoniac is passing along the fascist democrat leadership lies specifically engineered to obfuscate truth. Pay strict attention to what I am explaining for you regarding these evil animals, see above, it KNOWS its lying, it knows every word it scribbled in its post is a ******* lie, it knows this! :wink:

You cannot hope to reason with such vile, filthy, demonic evil, so stop ******* posting stupid threads inviting these animals to dialogue, they are murderous liars and worse, stop ******* encouraging them, the lie the above quoted animal spews is right from the top of the party of Satan, they are beyond our reach to save, they are fully in the hands of God and God will deal with them in time!

There are no good democrats, and the very, very few whom were good, have departed the evil party already, stop the silly ass nonsense of asking them to reason with you, there is nothing in the above animal with which to reason, it, and all of its fellow democrat demoniacs aren't out to make peace, they ******* want you dead so they can pursue their psychopathic sexual fantasies with absolute total social compliance to the fantasy or they will murder, rape and plunder!

Treat every democrat as you would a rabid dog, that is to be specific, treat them as extremely dangerous animals, which is exactly what they are! :wink:
 
and an overdose of media who turn these folks into celebrities while providing them with cover in the form of scapegoating guns.

I am not familiar with the shooter's media sources, nor whether they impacted his instability.
or shift the blame from the perp and who and/or what it was he hated to the weapon, in fact the perp and the media are co-equals in this, eh?

yes
It is wrong to shift blame away from th perpetrator to firearms or political opponents

Young, white males with easy access to firearms shoot people in America all too frequently. That has been the pattern for years.

 
I am not familiar with the shooter's media sources, nor whether they impacted his instability.
You need only be familiar with the media to understand the post
It is wrong to shift blame away from th perpetrator to firearms or political opponents
and yet you failed to mention that.
Young, white males with easy access to firearms shoot people in America all too frequently. That has been the pattern for years.
because the media is not held accountable for their contribution to it, so how can it ever be corrected? I didn't read your link so unless it somehow differs from the usual charts and/or drivel it is a safe bet it does not mention the medias contribution either making the click/read a waste of time.
 
the hillary effect
Actually, Clinton said "half" of Trump supporters fit into a basket of deplorables, while the other half are people who feel the government has let them down and need understanding and empathy. I have no way of knowing if her estimates were correct.

The latest averaging of public surveys shows most disapprove of Trump - 45.9% vs 51.4%.


 
As we all know, Charlie Kirk was a man of deep Christian conviction and his call to ministry led him to discussions at college campus events. His assassination, and that's exactly what this was, was 100% political and perpetrated by yet another Leftist basket case. As I have been more politically astute since 2004, many of the great Conservative stalwarts, even from back in the days of the Firing Line and William F. Buckley, have been warning about the decidedly leftward/Communist lurch of the Democrat party. And this is what we have as a result today. Political violence equivalent to that of the 1960s.

In a country obsessed with guns, it’s hardly surprising that people see them as a means to an end.

We are awash with violence. The violence will continue until we decide that we’ve had enough.

Kirk’s death won’t change anything. I wish it would. The problem is that we have already had to endure far worse acts of violence and nothing has changed. Kirk himself said it’s a price worth paying.
 
Actually, Clinton said "half" of Trump supporters fit into a basket of deplorables, while the other half are people who feel the government has let them down and need understanding and empathy.
proving I nailed it when I called it the "hillary effect" and I believe she said both those things as empathy and understanding are not what folks are looking for when government lets them down...they look for a change when that happens.
I have no way of knowing if her estimates were correct.
because why? your polling sources do not deem it necessary to check her claim and you couldn't care less if it is accurate? go look it up.
The latest averaging of public surveys shows most disapprove of Trump - 45.9% vs 51.4%.
All that proves is the polling arrow found its target audience.
 
THREAD LOCKED
There are several threads on this forum about Charlie Kirk. Pick one to post in.
 
15th post
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom