3)Obama himself inadvertantly admitted he was not qualified or experienced enough for the Job when his campaign rant questioned Palin's qualifications which were slightly better then his.
By bringing up a false statement of race on maters of qualifications is once again racist on your part.
Okay, let's look at that.
Obama- Got a JD from Harvard and was president of the Harvard Law Review.
Palin- Cobbled together enough credits for a BA in Communications from six colleges.
Obama- Successful Lawyer, State Legistlator and Senator.
Palin- Mayor of the Meth Capital of Alaska (Pop 6000), was governor for a little over a year, quit after two years to take a job at Fox.
Then again, the job at Fox was perfect for her. She had lots of experience talking to a retarded 5 year old.
4)
If a person happens to be part Black or of Russian ancestry those are irrelevant to the crux of the matter and by bringing up Race or nationality is a Racist or Xenophobic problem you and your party has, so don't deflect that way of thinking in your arguments because you are arguing in your mirror reflection of yourselves..
Uh, guy, your side completely lost their shit because he was a black man. to the point where you even rejected your own ideas because the black man did it.
Great example was the ACA. When Mitt Romney ran in 2008, he got more shit for being a Mormon than he did for proposing the combination of government and private expansion to provide universal health coverage in MA. He said this should be the model for the whole country, the Heritage Foundation agreed...
And then the black guy did it. The ironic thing is that when you guys get your wet dream of getting the courts to throw out the ACA, the people who will be most negatively effected will be all the dumb white trash in Flyover Country.