Muslims are ANGRY at Texas Mayor After She Stops “Sharia Court”

[toxicmedia]

it, in my sentence, actually referred to your objection to the courts. ...

The Courts ... which are illegal in the United States, because we already have a legal system, which rests in principle rejected by ISLAM. Which is the basis of my REJECTION OF SUCH.

so judge judy is illegal? the people's court is illegal? jewish and amish courts... illegal?
why aren't you protesting them?

incidentally, none of those are illegal.

Does Judge Judy have also have a 1200 year record of employing mass-murder as a means to acquire political power? I wasn't aware?

(Reader Judge Judy considers civil matters to which the parties sign contracts within the scope of the program... Judge Judy does not have any authority over the individuals and she cannot use law enforcement to enforce her rulings. Where the individuals fail to adhere to her ruling, the prevailing parties would need to seek judgement from a duly appointed court to enforce such.

By seeking sanction from the City of Irvine, the Muslims were seeking to increase their perceived authority... a first step to becoming recognized as an ACTUAL "AUTHORITY".)

Where is it ever mentioned that the Muslim Court is seeking any "sanction" from the City of Irvine?

The better question is, why are they seeking anything more than what any church does when there's an offense. Disciplinary action is decided upon within their power and anything from a rebuke to full disfellowship is applied. Any religion can do this, so what the hell do Muslims want above and beyond this?

Ummmm...maybe because they are trying to exercize their religious beliefs?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

The Courts ... which are illegal in the United States, because we already have a legal system, which rests in principle rejected by ISLAM. Which is the basis of my REJECTION OF SUCH.

so judge judy is illegal? the people's court is illegal? jewish and amish courts... illegal?
why aren't you protesting them?

incidentally, none of those are illegal.

Does Judge Judy have also have a 1200 year record of employing mass-murder as a means to acquire political power? I wasn't aware?

(Reader Judge Judy considers civil matters to which the parties sign contracts within the scope of the program... Judge Judy does not have any authority over the individuals and she cannot use law enforcement to enforce her rulings. Where the individuals fail to adhere to her ruling, the prevailing parties would need to seek judgement from a duly appointed court to enforce such.

By seeking sanction from the City of Irvine, the Muslims were seeking to increase their perceived authority... a first step to becoming recognized as an ACTUAL "AUTHORITY".)

Where is it ever mentioned that the Muslim Court is seeking any "sanction" from the City of Irvine?

The better question is, why are they seeking anything more than what any church does when there's an offense. Disciplinary action is decided upon within their power and anything from a rebuke to full disfellowship is applied. Any religion can do this, so what the hell do Muslims want above and beyond this?

Ummmm...maybe because they are trying to exercize their religious beliefs?

Their religious beliefs entail the application of religious law.

 

[Coyote]

so judge judy is illegal? the people's court is illegal? jewish and amish courts... illegal?
why aren't you protesting them?

incidentally, none of those are illegal.

Does Judge Judy have also have a 1200 year record of employing mass-murder as a means to acquire political power? I wasn't aware?

(Reader Judge Judy considers civil matters to which the parties sign contracts within the scope of the program... Judge Judy does not have any authority over the individuals and she cannot use law enforcement to enforce her rulings. Where the individuals fail to adhere to her ruling, the prevailing parties would need to seek judgement from a duly appointed court to enforce such.

By seeking sanction from the City of Irvine, the Muslims were seeking to increase their perceived authority... a first step to becoming recognized as an ACTUAL "AUTHORITY".)

Where is it ever mentioned that the Muslim Court is seeking any "sanction" from the City of Irvine?

The better question is, why are they seeking anything more than what any church does when there's an offense. Disciplinary action is decided upon within their power and anything from a rebuke to full disfellowship is applied. Any religion can do this, so what the hell do Muslims want above and beyond this?

Nothing.

Most of these are civil cases involving marriage, divorce, contracts.

Which are all public institutions subject to law and not subject to private arbitration. These are Muslims and Muslims have always meant Sh'ria law to have the force of law behind it. One has to be willingly blind to see nothing short of this will satisfy them.

Maybe because they are public not private? Churches are private. Also, employer's can include arbitration clauses for resolving disputes. For some reason, everyone but Muslims can do it in the eyes of some.

 

[Coyote]

Reader, be sure to take a moment to scan this thread and note that without exception, each individual advocating on behalf of Islam, is a Socialist.

That is all you need to know, to understand why:

THERE ARE NO LEFTIST AMERICANS!​

Did you say something?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Where is it ever mentioned that the Muslim Court is seeking any "sanction" from the City of Irvine?

The better question is, why are they seeking anything more than what any church does when there's an offense. Disciplinary action is decided upon within their power and anything from a rebuke to full disfellowship is applied. Any religion can do this, so what the hell do Muslims want above and beyond this?

Nothing.

Most of these are civil cases involving marriage, divorce, contracts.

Which are all public institutions subject to law and not subject to private arbitration. These are Muslims and Muslims have always meant Sh'ria law to have the force of law behind it. One has to be willingly blind to see nothing short of this will satisfy them.

Actually, all of those things can be subject to "private arbitration", as my parent's divorce was.

Your delusions of what those scary muslims really want are irrelevant.

You still owe me an apology, one that you agreed to give. Until that happens, I have NOTHING to say to you.

I couldn't care less if you have anything to say to me.

You pretending my posts don't exist won't make them less true.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

You know, I was just noticing, I've been a member here a few months longer than you, yet you have four times as many posts.
That's insane !
You have 43 thousand ******* posts in just two years !!
Don't you think you should concentrate on getting a life ?

Its not my fault you have nothing to say. Dont try to compete with me. Be yourself and dont be envious.

Lol !
I'm definitely not envious of someone who spends all their time here !

Of course you are envious. Thats the reason you took the time to note how many posts I have made. I, on the other hand, could care less about how many posts people make. You should be more secure in yourself or learn the ability to have something to say people will respond to.

I'm secure enough that I don't feel the need to create fifty posts a day.

Sure you are. Stop trying to convince me you are not insecure. What other reason would you notice how many times I post?

I was looking for a new definition of insanity.

 

[Asclepias]

Reader, be sure to take a moment to scan this thread and note that without exception, each individual advocating on behalf of Islam, is a Socialist.

That is all you need to know, to understand why:

THERE ARE NO LEFTIST AMERICANS!​

Reader (whoever you are), be sure to take note that all the morons on this thread have not been able to provide even 1 link to support the idiocy claimed in the OP.

If you need to understand why, just chalk it up to the morons being dropped on their heads or a genetic birth defect that affected their intellect.

 

[Asclepias]

Its not my fault you have nothing to say. Dont try to compete with me. Be yourself and dont be envious.

Lol !
I'm definitely not envious of someone who spends all their time here !

Of course you are envious. Thats the reason you took the time to note how many posts I have made. I, on the other hand, could care less about how many posts people make. You should be more secure in yourself or learn the ability to have something to say people will respond to.

I'm secure enough that I don't feel the need to create fifty posts a day.

Sure you are. Stop trying to convince me you are not insecure. What other reason would you notice how many times I post?

I was looking for a new definition of insanity.

If you brush your teeth in the mirror you'd get one daily.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Did you say something?

Yes. I repeated what was recently stated by no less an authority than a Moderator on this very site!

THERE ARE NO LEFTIST AMERICANS!​

 

[Asclepias]

Where is it ever mentioned that the Muslim Court is seeking any "sanction" from the City of Irvine?

The better question is, why are they seeking anything more than what any church does when there's an offense. Disciplinary action is decided upon within their power and anything from a rebuke to full disfellowship is applied. Any religion can do this, so what the hell do Muslims want above and beyond this?

Nothing.

Most of these are civil cases involving marriage, divorce, contracts.

Which are all public institutions subject to law and not subject to private arbitration. These are Muslims and Muslims have always meant Sh'ria law to have the force of law behind it. One has to be willingly blind to see nothing short of this will satisfy them.

Actually, all of those things can be subject to "private arbitration", as my parent's divorce was.

Your delusions of what those scary muslims really want are irrelevant.

You still owe me an apology, one that you agreed to give. Until that happens, I have NOTHING to say to you.

The less you say to anyone the better. You probably embarrass everyone around you whenever you start talking.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Did you say something?

Yes. I repeated what was recently stated by no less an authority than a Moderator on this very site!

THERE ARE NO LEFTIST AMERICANS!​

There is nothing quite like your inability to understand when you're being mocked, pubes.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Does Judge Judy have also have a 1200 year record of employing mass-murder as a means to acquire political power? I wasn't aware?

(Reader Judge Judy considers civil matters to which the parties sign contracts within the scope of the program... Judge Judy does not have any authority over the individuals and she cannot use law enforcement to enforce her rulings. Where the individuals fail to adhere to her ruling, the prevailing parties would need to seek judgement from a duly appointed court to enforce such.

By seeking sanction from the City of Irvine, the Muslims were seeking to increase their perceived authority... a first step to becoming recognized as an ACTUAL "AUTHORITY".)

Where is it ever mentioned that the Muslim Court is seeking any "sanction" from the City of Irvine?

The better question is, why are they seeking anything more than what any church does when there's an offense. Disciplinary action is decided upon within their power and anything from a rebuke to full disfellowship is applied. Any religion can do this, so what the hell do Muslims want above and beyond this?

Nothing.

Most of these are civil cases involving marriage, divorce, contracts.

Which are all public institutions subject to law and not subject to private arbitration. These are Muslims and Muslims have always meant Sh'ria law to have the force of law behind it. One has to be willingly blind to see nothing short of this will satisfy them.

Maybe because they are public not private? Churches are private. Also, employer's can include arbitration clauses for resolving disputes. For some reason, everyone but Muslims can do it in the eyes of some.

Nobody's denying Muslims the rights that any private organization has, but apparently it isn't enough for them and they want the power to impose civil penalties. Truth to tell, until they get the right to stone people to death after a trial, they'll never be happy.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

THERE ARE NO LEFTIST AMERICANS!

...

Thank you, Scrotum​

 

[Coyote]

Where is it ever mentioned that the Muslim Court is seeking any "sanction" from the City of Irvine?

The better question is, why are they seeking anything more than what any church does when there's an offense. Disciplinary action is decided upon within their power and anything from a rebuke to full disfellowship is applied. Any religion can do this, so what the hell do Muslims want above and beyond this?

Nothing.

Most of these are civil cases involving marriage, divorce, contracts.

Which are all public institutions subject to law and not subject to private arbitration. These are Muslims and Muslims have always meant Sh'ria law to have the force of law behind it. One has to be willingly blind to see nothing short of this will satisfy them.

Maybe because they are public not private? Churches are private. Also, employer's can include arbitration clauses for resolving disputes. For some reason, everyone but Muslims can do it in the eyes of some.

Nobody's denying Muslims the rights that any private organization has, but apparently it isn't enough for them and they want the power to impose civil penalties. Truth to tell, until they get the right to stone people to death after a trial, they'll never be happy.

What civil penalties?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Nobody's denying Muslims the rights that any private organization has, but apparently it isn't enough for them and they want the power to impose civil penalties. Truth to tell, until they get the right to stone people to death after a trial, they'll never be happy.

LOL! And guess who that will be? Can't you just see their faces when the Queer Bar is bombed and down the street are queers hanging from light poles... And how about this youtube Vids of the Lesbians being marched out, having been forced into Muslim garb... forced to kneel just before they're shot in the head or their head is sawed off by a dull machete?

"HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN?"

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Third party civil arbitration is completely legal in the US.

Without means of enforcement such arbitration is pointless.

Judge Judy is legally binding if the participants agree that it is beforehand.

Judith Sheindlin is a real judge in a real court of law.

Judy Sheindlin retired from her position of "real judge" in 1996, and the set of her TV show is not a "real court of law" in any sense of the word.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

The better question is, why are they seeking anything more than what any church does when there's an offense. Disciplinary action is decided upon within their power and anything from a rebuke to full disfellowship is applied. Any religion can do this, so what the hell do Muslims want above and beyond this?

Nothing.

Most of these are civil cases involving marriage, divorce, contracts.

Which are all public institutions subject to law and not subject to private arbitration. These are Muslims and Muslims have always meant Sh'ria law to have the force of law behind it. One has to be willingly blind to see nothing short of this will satisfy them.

Maybe because they are public not private? Churches are private. Also, employer's can include arbitration clauses for resolving disputes. For some reason, everyone but Muslims can do it in the eyes of some.

Nobody's denying Muslims the rights that any private organization has, but apparently it isn't enough for them and they want the power to impose civil penalties. Truth to tell, until they get the right to stone people to death after a trial, they'll never be happy.

What civil penalties?

All types of penalties up to and including death. I'm always amazed at how the Left ignores Islam's true nature. Christianity and Judaism operate outside of government, but Islam is both a religious and governmental system and will never be satisfied with the restraints of just being a private organization with no power.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

What civil penalties?

Whatever penalty the islamic Kangaroo Court declares. The point of going to the city was to gain the authority representative OF the City.

Don't burden yourself by trying to understand, as despite such being the most elementary of equations... it is well above your means to understand.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Nobody's denying Muslims the rights that any private organization has, but apparently it isn't enough for them and they want the power to impose civil penalties. Truth to tell, until they get the right to stone people to death after a trial, they'll never be happy.

LOL! And guess who that will be? Can't you just see their faces when the Queer Bar is bombed and down the street are queers hanging from light poles... And how about this youtube Vids of the Lesbians being marched out, having been forced into Muslim garb... forced to kneel just before they're shot in the head or their head is sawed off by a dull machete?

"HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN?"

One wonders when Muslims start homo tossing whether the Left will defend homosexuals or just look the other way, saying it's their culture to do so.

 

[Coyote]

What civil penalties?

Whatever penalty the islamic Kangaroo Court declares. The point of going to the city was to gain the authority representative OF the City.

Don't burden yourself by trying to understand, as despite such being the most elementary of equations... it is well above your means to understand.

For the upteenth time, let's try to stick to reality. What civil penalties are they seeking to impose - surely you can come up with an informational link with out a brain spasm?