ROFLMAO @ "muhummad's last sermon" The Koran was written more than 100 years after
the death of muhummad. Personal IDEOLOGY is very much an issue in evaluating
elected officials
Muslim woman wins Georgia house district 97 Democratic Party
- Thread starter MindWars
- Start date
ROFLMAO @ "muhummad's last sermon" The Koran was written more than 100 years after
the death of muhummad. Personal IDEOLOGY is very much an issue in evaluating
elected officials
skookerasbil
Platinum Member
Do we really want hundreds of these in our country like they have in Europe?
Hey, you just said "ask muhammad [sic]". So I did. Now you wanna whine "waaaah -- I don't like the answer"?
Careful what you wish for. You just got it.
Then answer the question still sitting there --- what the **** does a person's religion have to do with being a Congressional representative?
That's what's called a "question". Your job is to "answer".
Well?
Pop quiz: Name all the Lutherans in Congress, no Googling. Thirty seconds.
try again POGO----reread that "last sermon"
"so regard the life and property of every Muslim as a sacred trust."
the BE NICE and equality rules refer ONLY TO
MUSLIMS.
We sit, and we wait......
you got it ----do with it whatever you wish
And we continue to sit, and we continue to wait...
Let's see if we can take pity and help 'em out. The poor schmucks ran away.
---- Where's anything about "religion" in there again? Gee Wally, I can't find it.
Let's see if we can take pity and help 'em out. The poor schmucks ran away.
>> There are three, and only three, standing qualifications for U.S. Senator or Representative in Congress which are expressly set out in the U.S Constitution: age (25 for the House, 30 for the Senate); citizenship (at least seven years for the House, nine years for the Senate); and inhabitancy in the state at the time elected. U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 2, cl. 2 (House); and Article I, Section 3, cl. 3 (Senate). The Supreme Court of the United States has affirmed the historical understanding that the Constitution provides the exclusive qualifications to be a Member of Congress, and that neither a state nor Congress itself may add to or change such qualifications to federal office, absent a constitutional amendment. Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486, 522 (1969); U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton,514 U.S. 779, 800-801 (1995); Cook v. Gralike, 531 U.S. 510 (2001) <<
---- Where's anything about "religion" in there again? Gee Wally, I can't find it.
But the girl on the right is wearing a scarf!
You left out Mormons- hell good Christian Americans were murdering them because of their religious beliefs......let alone thinking that they could be elected to office.
Now certainly nothing prevents a bigot from voting against someone because she is Jewish- or Catholic- or an Evangelical Christian- or a Mormon- but that is very, very different from implying- or flat out declaring that someone shouldn't be allowed to run for office because she is Jewish or Catholic or Evangelical Christian or Mormon- or Muslim.
You are explaining thinly veiled xenophobia. Globalism is more so a description of economic forces and trends. My take is that unions, workers rights, and improved benefits all went too far for corporate America to stomach so the invisible hand opened the door to the global economy we have today. It was inevitable though. It's immoral and illogical for the wealthiest nation in the world to stand atop an impoverished working class. If anything, globalism is a side effect of democrats and the working class demanding their fair share of the pie. They don't actually want the jobs and business going over seas but they also don't want to fold under the boot of the all powerful mega conglomerate and work for pennies in horrid conditions. Collective bargaining and class action law suits are needed to even the playing field.
The multiculturalism aspect is a true reading of the constitution. All men and women are equal here under the law and immigration is a corner stone of our short history. If you can't swallow that the problem is with you and your archaic beliefs not the interpretation and expression of the constitutional decree. I vote Democrat and I'm not for open borders. Opposing trump's nasty rhetoric and poor ideas doesn't mean we are for open borders. A good number of congressional democrats supported bills improving security that didn't entirely focus on the wall and demonizing muslims and Latinos.
You're welcome for fixing your halfassed contradictive perspective. Like so many other contradictive right wing ideas.
Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #312
Why is that? Does the name Eric Rudolph or Timothy McVeigh ring a bell?
Do any of the previous you mentioned have a 1400 year history of genocide and oppression?
First of all, Islam isn’t a race, it’s an ideology.
How many or Catholic or Jewish terrorist have carried out attacks?
Your argument falls flat on its face.
Bullshit. Nearly every Dem in Congress is for open borders and not enforcing our immigration laws. They support importing more Islamists.
You can call it “xenophobia” or whatever you want. Allowing other cultures that have no desire to assimilate into ours will only lead to the eradication of ours if left unchecked. It’s not a “phobia”, it’s a fact.
The Founding Fathers meant our constitution for those with similar Western values. Even Thomas Jefferson was appalled by radical Islamists and the danger they posed, and he knew there was no reasoning with Muslims. He knew the only way to deal with Muslim barbarians was with force. That’s why our first war after the revolutionary war was with Muslims in North Africa. He would no doubt be disgusted by the Democrats who embrace and support Islam, an ideology totally incompatible with Western democracy.
Not necessarily. They have an infinite history of being shiftless, lazy, drunk, cheating, greasy, swindling, thieving no-goodniks who take their orders from the pope, have too-slanted eyes, have too-big lips, reproduce like rabbits, live in squalor, talk funny, take your jobs, rape your daughters, steal your wallet, play strange music, and they smell, whooooa the smell. And some, I assume, are good people.
Mix 'n' match the above as necessary, rotate your stock to keep it fresh, and hope that nobody notices it's the same old shit-game.
Hope this helps, and any time you need new ideas in bigotry just open a history book, lather, rinse repeat.
You actually want numbers? More than Muslims actually.
Where did anybody say "Islam is a race"?
Your bigotry is recycled shit. Discredited every time it's been trotted out on the field. But you know what -- run the same play again and this time, expect different results.
SMH
The Mooslems are coming! The Mooslems are coming.
The only difference between you and the anti-semites is the religion of the people you want to foment hate against.
Show me one.
Show me one Democrat in Congress who says that he or she wants open borders.
Go for it.
Run the same play and expect different results?
Everywhere Islam has spread has become an oppressive shithole. Can you name one Muslim majority country that treats women equally? One Muslim country that protects gays? One Muslim country that doesn’t persecute Jews? One Muslim country that actually practices democracy and treats all citizens equally?
We all know the answer is none.
Yet you expect Muslims will be different if given power in Western countries.
Yet you expect America to act like those oppressive shitholes and tell Americans that they cannot be elected- if the faith they belong to is Islam.
I expect American Muslims to act like American Jews and American Christians and American atheists and American Buddhists and American Hindus.
You believe in religious bigotry in America- I don't.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
The controlled demolition of Western Civilization. (Tucker video)- Started by Invisibleflash
- Replies: 1
-
-
Young conservatives' anger at women is taking a nihilistic turn- Started by C_Clayton_Jones
- Replies: 5
-
