Musk just left Joe Rogan absolutely STUNNED after explaining the real reason Dems refuse to open the government

[ColonelAngus]

.

They never have one.

.

They swear they WATCHED TRUMP SAY INJECT BLEACH LIVE ON TV.

THEY ARE FOS.

 

[pknopp]

NYC hotels that converted into migrant shelters set to rake in over $1B in taxpayer funds: internal docs

According to an internal document obtained by The Post, of the 193 migrant shelters currently being used by the city, 153 are hotels or other commercial lodgings.

nypost.com

NYC hotels that converted into migrant shelters set to rake in over $1B in taxpayer funds: internal docs​

Not a word about a single one of them being here illegally. They came seeking asylum which gives them a legal status.

another instance where you have been brainwashed.

You can argue against allowing so many to seek asylum but it is a legal status.

 

[80zephyr]

No.

Illegals with anchor babies get welfare.

 

[pknopp]

Illegals with anchor babies get welfare.

The kids (who are citizens) can get a small bit of help. One can not survive on that small amount. That's what the jobs are for.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Not a word about a single one of them being here illegally. They came seeking asylum which gives them a legal status.

another instance where you have been brainwashed.

You can argue against allowing so many to seek asylum but it is a legal status.

There was no "here illegally" when Biden was allowing 10s of thousands per month to cross and enter with just a promise they would show up to court date at some undetermined time in the future.

When you go through the legal immigration process the government doesn't put you up in a NYC hotel.

 

[pknopp]

There was no "here illegally" when Biden was allowing 10s of thousands per month cross and enter with just a promise they would show up to court date at some undetermined time in the future.

Again, you can argue against allowing it to happen, but they had a legal status.

When you go through the legal immigration process the government doesn't put you up in a NYC hotel.

Where is that written?

 

[80zephyr]

The kids (who are citizens) can get a small bit of help. One can not survive on that small amount. That's what the jobs are for.

If the parents are poor, will the government provide money for housing to protect that new American citizen?

 

[pknopp]

If the parents are poor, will the government provide money for housing to protect that new American citizen?

How many times does this have to be answered for you? No. Kids can not apply for housing.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Again, you can argue against allowing it to happen, but they had a legal status.




Where is that written?

Their "legal status" was not in accordance with US law and process. They were not vetted. Under US immigration law before Biden we didn't accept just anyone who shows up at the border, take their cell phone number and say come on in.

The method of giving them this "status" was never adjudicated and had it moved forward in the courts there is no way it would withstand scrutiny.

Where is it written that you don't get a NYC hotel when you go through the legal immigration process?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Not a word about a single one of them being here illegally. They came seeking asylum which gives them a legal status.

.

No, it doesn't.





.

 

[pknopp]

Their "legal status" was not in accordance with US law and process.

It was.

They were not vetted. Under US immigration law before Biden we didn't accept just anyone who shows up at the border, take their cell phone number and say come on in.

The method of giving them this "status" was never adjudicated and had it moved forward in the courts there is no way it would withstand scrutiny.

Where is it written that you don't get a NYC hotel when you go through the legal immigration process?

I've posted the laws a countless number of times. All you have to do is get here and claim asylum within one year. You can condemn the law but it is what it is.

Questions and Answers: Affirmative Asylum Eligibility and Applications | USCIS

If you were placed in expedited removal proceedings, you received a positive credible fear determination, and USCIS retained your asylum application for further consideration in an Asylum Merits Interview, please visit our Asylum Merits Interview with USCIS: Processing After a Positive Credible...

www.uscis.gov

 

[pknopp]

.

No, it doesn't.





.

Questions and Answers: Affirmative Asylum Eligibility and Applications | USCIS

If you were placed in expedited removal proceedings, you received a positive credible fear determination, and USCIS retained your asylum application for further consideration in an Asylum Merits Interview, please visit our Asylum Merits Interview with USCIS: Processing After a Positive Credible...

www.uscis.gov

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Not a word about a single one of them being here illegally. They came seeking asylum which gives them a legal status.

another instance where you have been brainwashed.

You can argue against allowing so many to seek asylum but it is a legal status.

So you do know the Democrat game of how they get welfare to the illegals. They just bypass all immigration laws and call them all refugees and sign them up for benefits.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Questions and Answers: Affirmative Asylum Eligibility and Applications | USCIS

If you were placed in expedited removal proceedings, you received a positive credible fear determination, and USCIS retained your asylum application for further consideration in an Asylum Merits Interview, please visit our Asylum Merits Interview with USCIS: Processing After a Positive Credible...

www.uscis.gov

.

Wrong.







.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

It was.




I've posted the laws a countless number of times. All you have to do is get here and claim asylum within one year. You can condemn the law but it is what it is.

Questions and Answers: Affirmative Asylum Eligibility and Applications | USCIS

If you were placed in expedited removal proceedings, you received a positive credible fear determination, and USCIS retained your asylum application for further consideration in an Asylum Merits Interview, please visit our Asylum Merits Interview with USCIS: Processing After a Positive Credible...

www.uscis.gov

.

Wrong.





.

 

[OODA_Loop]

I've posted the laws a countless number of times. All you have to do is get here and claim asylum within one year. You can condemn the law but it is what it is.

Questions and Answers: Affirmative Asylum Eligibility and Applications | USCIS

If you were placed in expedited removal proceedings, you received a positive credible fear determination, and USCIS retained your asylum application for further consideration in an Asylum Merits Interview, please visit our Asylum Merits Interview with USCIS: Processing After a Positive Credible...

www.uscis.gov

It is the administrative process enforcing the law that is at question and what remained untested by the court.

 

[pknopp]

It is the administrative process enforcing the law that is at question and what remained untested by the court.

Maybe you have a point, maybe not. A vast generalization isn't much of an argument.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Maybe you have a point, maybe not. A vast generalization isn't much of an argument.

Maybe you have a point, maybe not. A vast generalization isn't much of an argument.

Specifically the Biden administrative process to allow asylum seekers to enter with zero vetting using only a smartphone app and a promise.

 

[pknopp]

Specifically the Biden administrative process to allow asylum seekers to enter with zero vetting using only a smartphone app and a promise.

That is legal. It can be argued it made a mess (which it did).

I never had a clue what the administration was thinking. All I noted was it was legal. It certainly hurt the Democrats but they seem good at that.

 

[Lockback]

That is legal. It can be argued it made a mess (which it did).

I never had a clue what the administration was thinking. All I noted was it was legal. It certainly hurt the Democrats but they seem good at that.

It may have had some thin veil of legality but it was an act of treason, plain and simple.