Total war deaths: 626,761 soldiers killed under Democrats and 26,895 killed under Republican presidents.
If yours is correct, so is mine. Or is there more nuance to these figures?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Total war deaths: 626,761 soldiers killed under Democrats and 26,895 killed under Republican presidents.
Of course they did but it was not Obama's fault. What Bush did was create the situation where poverty had to grow because of what he did that Obama tried to FIX.
The poor and middle class did worse or at best treaded water while the stock markets and corporate profits soared.
Of course they did but it was not Obama's fault. What Bush did was create the situation where poverty had to grow because of what he did that Obama tried to FIX.
It is like blaming Biden for the increase of deaths from Covid (which did happen) but then it was the fact that Trump allowed the spread of the disease to grow more than it should have and therefore, more people died under Biden than under Trump because the spread of the disease has started to grow.
I'm not talking about Musk, you low IQ party of slavery supporting dumbass.No, I did not say anything. Musk said it!
Total war deaths: 626,761 soldiers killed under Democrats and 26,895 killed under Republican presidents.
If yours is correct, so is mine. Or is there more nuance to these figures?
It will never cease to amaze me how both hypocritical and just plain blind people are.
Wow, Trump saying one thing (to get people's votes) but doing the opposite? Is that what the Republicans support?
Wars are usually started by other nations (not by us) and therefore your statistic has a flaw, given that you need to prove that under the Democrats, it was they that caused the wars that killed more people.
Having said, here is another negative fact against the Republicans.
View attachment 1118314
Prove why they should have been indicted and prove that they weren't, simply because the Democrats did not WANT to do it.The problem with that is James Clapper should have been indicted. Lois Lerner should have been indicted. Eric Holder should have been indicted. Every one involved in the "it was about a video" should have been indicted.
Meaning that if the Democrats do it, it is okay for Trump to do it, right? If that is what you believe, then you have no right to criticize the Democrats, given that you support Trump doing it.It will never cease to amaze me how both hypocritical and just plain blind people are.
And you are both with this statement.
As if republicans have a market on lying politicians.
All this does is make people read your post and just say - STFU
Prove why they should have been indicted and prove that they weren't, simply because the Democrats did not WANT to do it.
Meaning that if the Democrats do it, it is okay for Trump to do it, right? If that is what you believe, then you have no right to criticize the Democrats, given that you support Trump doing it.
You made the statement that those people should have been indicted. You need to prove why you believe that.I don't have to prove something I never argued. Republicans were complicitous also.
On the "Big, Beautiful Bill"
Wow, Trump saying one thing (to get people's votes) but doing the opposite? Is that what the Republicans support?
I too am disappointed at the spending bill.On the "Big, Beautiful Bill"
In Washington, federal workers say that DOGE has left the government's operations in disarray. And worst of all, it might have all been for nothing. Musk claims to have saved the government $175 billion so far (nowhere close to his original target of $2 trillion, or even his revised target of $1 trillion).
And that was before the president's new spending bill passed the House. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the president's proposed budget will add $3.8 trillion to our debt over the next ten years. It's now being debated in the Senate.
Musk said, "I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, doesn't decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing."
I said, "I actually thought that, when this 'big, beautiful bill' came along, it'd be like, everything he's done on DOGE gets wiped out in the first year."
Wow, Trump saying one thing (to get people's votes) but doing the opposite? Is that what the Republicans support?
You made the statement that those people should have been indicted. You need to prove why you believe that.
Again - you show your blind bias.Meaning that if the Democrats do it, it is okay for Trump to do it, right? If that is what you believe, then you have no right to criticize the Democrats, given that you support Trump doing it.
Lol.
Now you suddenly care about what Musk says? Well then. People like you sway about like wheat stalks in the wind.
You also need to prove that I defend Democrats.You defend Democrats no matter what they do so you can not expect MAGA to be any better.
You also need to prove that I defend Democrats.
There has not been one single post of mine where I defend the Democrats. I am an independent that criticizes all, when something wrong is done. As such, I am not partisan in any way. I am a person that deals with data, statistics and facts and everything that I talk about is based on that.
As such, I defend all people (not just the Democrats) when an injustice has been made about them. I criticize all when they have done an injustice.
I watched the interview Sunday. Musk was a bit all over the place. I guess he was afraid to criticize Trump harshly for fear he could kill his spacex cash flow.On the "Big, Beautiful Bill"
In Washington, federal workers say that DOGE has left the government's operations in disarray. And worst of all, it might have all been for nothing. Musk claims to have saved the government $175 billion so far (nowhere close to his original target of $2 trillion, or even his revised target of $1 trillion).
And that was before the president's new spending bill passed the House. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the president's proposed budget will add $3.8 trillion to our debt over the next ten years. It's now being debated in the Senate.
Musk said, "I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, doesn't decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing."
I said, "I actually thought that, when this 'big, beautiful bill' came along, it'd be like, everything he's done on DOGE gets wiped out in the first year."
Wow, Trump saying one thing (to get people's votes) but doing the opposite? Is that what the Republicans support?