Multiple major banks including JP Morgan and Bank of America have been subpoenaed for Biden family finance records.

I see no crime, other than the misdemeanor for not putting the payment for the NDA on the proper line. This “secret” more serious crime isn’t even named.
What you see is irrelevant. What the White Collar accused is facing is more than what you blindly see.
 
Trump is NOT The "United States president" whatever that is supposed to mean. He's an ex-president thrown out of office by The People, in favor of Sleepy Joe Biden.

see the attached: Trump is "Defendant" not former/ex-President

This is a thread about defendant
being arrested, indicted, and soon to be tried in a Court of Law.
The case brings up legal issues beyond the ordinary White Collar Crimes (Defendant Trump is accused of commiting)
I’m talking about Biden, you idiot! HIS financial records have been subpoenaed due to the odd payoffs from the Communist Chinese Party.
 
The implication seems to be that the Dems have another goal in mind besides the obvious - to destroy Trump through bogus felony charges and fool enough gullible idiots to believe he must be a major criminal.
It's not any 'The Dems' it's a DA in NY, who's office prosecutes White Collar defendants like Trump
 
I’m talking about Biden, you idiot! HIS financial records have been subpoenaed due to the odd payoffs from the Communist Chinese Party.
Subpoenaed? Biden's? Are you sure? The records of the sitting P{Resident have been subpoenaed? By who, a group of hacks in a ridiculous congressional committee?

FAKE NEWS!
 
Yes, by Congress. Didn’t the lib rags you get your news from report that?
By a GOP led Committee out to get Biden?

Well, maybe Biden can ignore them -- precedent set.

and the financial records of the President have NOT been subpoenaed. Facts matter.
 
It’s prosecutorial misconduct. He conjured up a felony never even heard of before.
You don't know what you're talking about. You're regurgitating talking points. No one conjured up anything. Read the indictment. Try and understand Trump's personal lawyer (former) was convicted and turned state's evidence/witness. And others have testified and there exists documents etc
 
By a GOP led Committee out to get Biden?

what about the Pelosi-led Jan 6 committee out to get Trump? That wasn’t even a real committee - just a group of Trump-haters,
Well, maybe Biden can ignore them -- precedent set.

and the financial records of the President have NOT been subpoenaed. Facts matter.
Yes, they have - not from him, but by the banks he and the Biden Corruption Family made deposits.
 
Let's try this again:

The case is not made up, conjured up, or about an NDA, legal or otherwise. Not sure why people are convincing themselves otherwise.

It's mentally unsound to avoid reality

View attachment 774302

"After winning the election, TRUMP reimbursed the Special Counsel through a series of monthly checks, first from the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust – created in New York to hold the Trump Organization’s assets during TRUMP’s presidency – and later from TRUMP’s bank account. In total, 11 checks were issued for a phony purpose. Nine of those checks were signed by TRUMP. Each check was processed by the Trump Organization and illegally disguised as a payment for legal services rendered pursuant to a non-existent retainer agreement. In total, 34 false entries were made in New York business records to conceal the initial covert $130,000 payment. Further, participants in the scheme took steps that mischaracterized, for tax purposes, the true nature of the reimbursements." -- note: not about any NDA

Defendant Information:

DONALD J. TRUMP
Palm Beach, FL

Charges:
  • Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree, a class E felony, 34 counts

[1] The charges contained in the indictment are merely allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. All factual recitations are derived from documents filed in court and statements made on the record in court.

 
You don't know what you're talking about. You're regurgitating talking points. No one conjured up anything. Read the indictment. Try and understand Trump's personal lawyer (former) was convicted and turned state's evidence/witness. And others have testified and there exists documents etc
What is the crime? Other than not putting the hush money on the proper line?

What line did Hillary put the money that she sent to the lawyers to pay off the creation of the fake dossier?
 
what about the Pelosi-led Jan 6 committee out to get Trump? That wasn’t even a real committee - just a group of Trump-haters,

Yes, they have - not from him, but by the banks he and the Biden Corruption Family made deposits.
That was a bipartisan committee investigating an Insurrection at the Nations Capitol building
 
What is the crime? Other than not putting the hush money on the proper line?

What line did Hillary put the money that she sent to the lawyers to pay off the creation of the fake dossier?
read the indictment, and it's not about Hillary, or Bozo the Clown
 
Let's try this again:

The case is not made up, conjured up, or about an NDA, legal or otherwise. Not sure why people are convincing themselves otherwise.

It's mentally unsound to avoid reality

View attachment 774302

"After winning the election, TRUMP reimbursed the Special Counsel through a series of monthly checks, first from the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust – created in New York to hold the Trump Organization’s assets during TRUMP’s presidency – and later from TRUMP’s bank account. In total, 11 checks were issued for a phony purpose. Nine of those checks were signed by TRUMP. Each check was processed by the Trump Organization and illegally disguised as a payment for legal services rendered pursuant to a non-existent retainer agreement. In total, 34 false entries were made in New York business records to conceal the initial covert $130,000 payment. Further, participants in the scheme took steps that mischaracterized, for tax purposes, the true nature of the reimbursements." -- note: not about any NDA



Eh. It’s still about paying a small amount of money in a non-disclosure agreement in relation to a consensual sexual relationship between adults. Pales in comparison to the Russia-fantasy Hillary paid for to defeat Trump.
 

Forum List

Back
Top