Mueller explicitly says he can't clear Trump of obstruction of justice

[jknowgood]

'Special counsel Robert Mueller explicitly stated in his Russia investigation report that he and his team had not cleared President Donald Trump of accusations of obstruction of justice.

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state," the report read. "However, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."'

Mueller explicitly says he can't clear Trump of obstruction of justice


If Trump and his Trumpbots think the Mueller report cleared the former of obstruction of justice?

They are 100% wrong.

According to the Mueller report Trump CLEARLY had the intention to obstruct the investigation. Trump's actions clearly demonstrate this. Mueller laid out in the report those actions by Trump himself & by Trump's instructions to subordinates, that demonstrate Trump was active in his attempts to circumvent Mueller's function as SC. There is no debating those facts. Thus Mueller's statement, "The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."
That statement has real potential to be both politically & legally damning for Trump.

It seems that those replying to your OP either refuse to acknowledge the fact, or they are just too stupid to understand that the so called 'collusion' issue is a completely different issue than the obstruction of justice concept. No surprises though as these folks typically seem to play stupid.

Lol, keep this crap up. The more you whine, the higher Trump approval rating gets.

Yet another brain dead that would rather sling shit than to acknowledge there are 12 active/ongoing investigations that most likely involve your wittle hero in The White House.

Muller was given unlimited resources to get Trump on whatever he could. He got nothing.

 

[caddo kid]

'Special counsel Robert Mueller explicitly stated in his Russia investigation report that he and his team had not cleared President Donald Trump of accusations of obstruction of justice.

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state," the report read. "However, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."'

Mueller explicitly says he can't clear Trump of obstruction of justice


If Trump and his Trumpbots think the Mueller report cleared the former of obstruction of justice?

They are 100% wrong.

According to the Mueller report Trump CLEARLY had the intention to obstruct the investigation. Trump's actions clearly demonstrate this. Mueller laid out in the report those actions by Trump himself & by Trump's instructions to subordinates, that demonstrate Trump was active in his attempts to circumvent Mueller's function as SC. There is no debating those facts. Thus Mueller's statement, "The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."
That statement has real potential to be both politically & legally damning for Trump.

It seems that those replying to your OP either refuse to acknowledge the fact, or they are just too stupid to understand that the so called 'collusion' issue is a completely different issue than the obstruction of justice concept. No surprises though as these folks typically seem to play stupid.

Lol, keep this crap up. The more you whine, the higher Trump approval rating gets.

Yet another brain dead that would rather sling shit than to acknowledge there are 12 active/ongoing investigations that most likely involve your wittle hero in The White House.

Muller was given unlimited resources to get Trump on whatever he could. He got nothing.

Mueller's job was to investigate the claimed Russian interference in the context of the 2016 POTUS election.

He did his job.

 

[WEATHER53]

Trump must prove himself innocent.
That how liberal gestapo works.

 

[jknowgood]

'Special counsel Robert Mueller explicitly stated in his Russia investigation report that he and his team had not cleared President Donald Trump of accusations of obstruction of justice.

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state," the report read. "However, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."'

Mueller explicitly says he can't clear Trump of obstruction of justice


If Trump and his Trumpbots think the Mueller report cleared the former of obstruction of justice?

They are 100% wrong.

According to the Mueller report Trump CLEARLY had the intention to obstruct the investigation. Trump's actions clearly demonstrate this. Mueller laid out in the report those actions by Trump himself & by Trump's instructions to subordinates, that demonstrate Trump was active in his attempts to circumvent Mueller's function as SC. There is no debating those facts. Thus Mueller's statement, "The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."
That statement has real potential to be both politically & legally damning for Trump.

It seems that those replying to your OP either refuse to acknowledge the fact, or they are just too stupid to understand that the so called 'collusion' issue is a completely different issue than the obstruction of justice concept. No surprises though as these folks typically seem to play stupid.

Lol, keep this crap up. The more you whine, the higher Trump approval rating gets.

Yet another brain dead that would rather sling shit than to acknowledge there are 12 active/ongoing investigations that most likely involve your wittle hero in The White House.

Muller was given unlimited resources to get Trump on whatever he could. He got nothing.

Mueller's job was to investigate the claimed Russian interference in the context of the 2016 POTUS election.

He did his job.

They went over Trump with a fine tooth comb and still came up with nothing. Trump is probably the cleanest president we ever had. Thanks for making him president till 2024!

 

[WTH_Progs?]

If Demonicrats and progs think the Mueller report makes a clear case for obstruction of justice?

They are 100% wrong.

 

[WEATHER53]

Liberals reach for a conclusion that Mueller did not make and demand Barr provide info emotionally soothing to them. He can’t and won’t so here is our newest “under investigation”

 

[BS Filter]

'Special counsel Robert Mueller explicitly stated in his Russia investigation report that he and his team had not cleared President Donald Trump of accusations of obstruction of justice.

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state," the report read. "However, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."'

Mueller explicitly says he can't clear Trump of obstruction of justice


If Trump and his Trumpbots think the Mueller report cleared the former of obstruction of justice?

They are 100% wrong.

According to the Mueller report Trump CLEARLY had the intention to obstruct the investigation. Trump's actions clearly demonstrate this. Mueller laid out in the report those actions by Trump himself & by Trump's instructions to subordinates, that demonstrate Trump was active in his attempts to circumvent Mueller's function as SC. There is no debating those facts. Thus Mueller's statement, "The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."
That statement has real potential to be both politically & legally damning for Trump.

It seems that those replying to your OP either refuse to acknowledge the fact, or they are just too stupid to understand that the so called 'collusion' issue is a completely different issue than the obstruction of justice concept. No surprises though as these folks typically seem to play stupid.

Lol, keep this crap up. The more you whine, the higher Trump approval rating gets.

Yet another brain dead that would rather sling shit than to acknowledge there are 12 active/ongoing investigations that most likely involve your wittle hero in The White House.

Muller was given unlimited resources to get Trump on whatever he could. He got nothing.

Mueller's job was to investigate the claimed Russian interference in the context of the 2016 POTUS election.

He did his job.

I agree. He did his job and got nothing on Trump. Now go pound sand.

 

[Lastamender]

'Special counsel Robert Mueller explicitly stated in his Russia investigation report that he and his team had not cleared President Donald Trump of accusations of obstruction of justice.

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state," the report read. "However, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."'

Mueller explicitly says he can't clear Trump of obstruction of justice


If Trump and his Trumpbots think the Mueller report cleared the former of obstruction of justice?

They are 100% wrong.

According to the Mueller report Trump CLEARLY had the intention to obstruct the investigation. Trump's actions clearly demonstrate this. Mueller laid out in the report those actions by Trump himself & by Trump's instructions to subordinates, that demonstrate Trump was active in his attempts to circumvent Mueller's function as SC. There is no debating those facts. Thus Mueller's statement, "The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."
That statement has real potential to be both politically & legally damning for Trump.

It seems that those replying to your OP either refuse to acknowledge the fact, or they are just too stupid to understand that the so called 'collusion' issue is a completely different issue than the obstruction of justice concept. No surprises though as these folks typically seem to play stupid.

If that's the best thing you morons got out of this report, you have nothing.

He could have might have thought and talked about maybe trying to possibly do something or nothing about the investigation.

So, you obviously are OK with any POTUS making massive attempts to obstruct SC investigations.

Not surprised .......

So, you obviously are OK with any POTUS making massive attempts to obstruct SC investigations.

Tell us about some and throw in some proof, not opinion.

 

[BS Filter]

If Demonicrats and progs think the Mueller report makes a clear case for obstruction of justice?

They are 100% wrong.

Of course they're wrong. Obstruction of justice is an impeachable offense. The Democrats said they are not going to impeach Trump.

 

[Votto]

Hello!?!

You made the statement with 'exonerate' in it (plus, you put the word in quotations) and THEN you said 'Are you serious?'

Am I serious about what? I said NOTHING about 'exonerate'.

Here is a question even you can understand.

Did I use the word 'exonerate' ANYWHERE in the OP? Yes or no?


And where the **** in the Mueller Report did it specifically say that Trump was 'exonerate'd of any crimes/wrong doing?


And, so EVERYONE is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law? Fine....I agree. So you are saying that Hilary Clinton is presumed innocent of ANY wrongdoing when it comes to ANYTHING she did while in Obama's White House because she was not convicted of any wrongdoing/illegalities (like Benghazi)?

Yes or no?

Yes, Hillary Clinton...like every other American...is presumed innocent until guilt is proven.

Where did I claim that the Mueller Report said Trump was exonerated? What I said is that it's farce when the best that an investigation can come up with against a person accused of treason is that they didn't find enough evidence to exonerate them! That isn't the way it works in our legal system! Prosecutors need to prove guilt...it isn't up to those accused to prove that they are innocent!

You didn't - I misread you, sorry.

And drop the 'innocent until proven...' shit...WE ALL KNOW THAT.


Now answer the question:

Did I use the word 'exonerate' ANYWHERE in the OP? Yes or no?

Once again...I never claimed you did! Exonerate was what was used in the Mueller Report. What part of this can't you grasp?

Your words:

'LOL...that's amusing, McRocket! So the best that a Mueller "team" has after two plus years of investigations is that they couldn't come up with anything that Trump did but they still can't "exonerate" him? Are you serious?'

You spoke to be by name and then you ask me a question ('are you serious') about something that has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the OP.

What the **** are you asking me about the report not 'exonerate'ing Trump for?

I did not say anything about exoneration.


AND BTW - your 'innocent until proven guilty' point is TOTALLY irrelevant in this case as Mueller said in the report that - basically - under no circumstances was he going to call for a charge against Trump for ANYTHING because he believed you cannot charge a sitting POTUS with a crime.
Which means - Trump could have murdered someone and Mueller STILL would not call for a charge against him.

It's not like Trump to murder somebody else. He has clean hands, Mr. McRocket. He didn't do what many of his adversaries wish he could or would do due to their wrongful direction, not President Trumps' good direction he has taken the country--to respect other people's rights and to do well in the market. That's the real Donald Trump. He wins by winning good things for other people. The Democrats, on the other hand, have put all their chips on dragging other people down so they can climb their way to the top of the heap. Our freedom from tyranny wasn't won that way. It was won by getting the beast off our backs, and doing what we could with what we had left after the war had killed off brave men, many of their families, because their enemies back then didn't fight fair. They went after not just the American Army, they went after the signers of the Declaration of Independence, their wives and kids as well, and put as many of them to death as they could. They burned their homes, their crops, anything that would sustain these hard-headed American people from winning independence from their corrupt King George III who hated his own subjects so much he wouldn't receive them in his courts leaving us only independent rule from this selfish man.

Neither will Trump cowtow to scheming tyrants like Hillary.

Trump is the only President since Carter not to go to war over seas, yet the Left says he is Hitler?

They are all a bunch of retards.

 

[BS Filter]

Yes, Hillary Clinton...like every other American...is presumed innocent until guilt is proven.

Where did I claim that the Mueller Report said Trump was exonerated? What I said is that it's farce when the best that an investigation can come up with against a person accused of treason is that they didn't find enough evidence to exonerate them! That isn't the way it works in our legal system! Prosecutors need to prove guilt...it isn't up to those accused to prove that they are innocent!

You didn't - I misread you, sorry.

And drop the 'innocent until proven...' shit...WE ALL KNOW THAT.


Now answer the question:

Did I use the word 'exonerate' ANYWHERE in the OP? Yes or no?

Once again...I never claimed you did! Exonerate was what was used in the Mueller Report. What part of this can't you grasp?

Your words:

'LOL...that's amusing, McRocket! So the best that a Mueller "team" has after two plus years of investigations is that they couldn't come up with anything that Trump did but they still can't "exonerate" him? Are you serious?'

You spoke to be by name and then you ask me a question ('are you serious') about something that has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the OP.

What the **** are you asking me about the report not 'exonerate'ing Trump for?

I did not say anything about exoneration.


AND BTW - your 'innocent until proven guilty' point is TOTALLY irrelevant in this case as Mueller said in the report that - basically - under no circumstances was he going to call for a charge against Trump for ANYTHING because he believed you cannot charge a sitting POTUS with a crime.
Which means - Trump could have murdered someone and Mueller STILL would not call for a charge against him.

It's not like Trump to murder somebody else. He has clean hands, Mr. McRocket. He didn't do what many of his adversaries wish he could or would do due to their wrongful direction, not President Trumps' good direction he has taken the country--to respect other people's rights and to do well in the market. That's the real Donald Trump. He wins by winning good things for other people. The Democrats, on the other hand, have put all their chips on dragging other people down so they can climb their way to the top of the heap. Our freedom from tyranny wasn't won that way. It was won by getting the beast off our backs, and doing what we could with what we had left after the war had killed off brave men, many of their families, because their enemies back then didn't fight fair. They went after not just the American Army, they went after the signers of the Declaration of Independence, their wives and kids as well, and put as many of them to death as they could. They burned their homes, their crops, anything that would sustain these hard-headed American people from winning independence from their corrupt King George III who hated his own subjects so much he wouldn't receive them in his courts leaving us only independent rule from this selfish man.

Neither will Trump cowtow to scheming tyrants like Hillary.

Trump is the only President since Carter not to go to war over seas, yet the Left says he is Hitler?

They are all a bunch of retards.

Worse than retards. They're America hating commies.

 

[martybegan]

'Special counsel Robert Mueller explicitly stated in his Russia investigation report that he and his team had not cleared President Donald Trump of accusations of obstruction of justice.

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state," the report read. "However, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."'

Mueller explicitly says he can't clear Trump of obstruction of justice


If Trump and his Trumpbots think the Mueller report cleared the former of obstruction of justice?

They are 100% wrong.

According to the Mueller report Trump CLEARLY had the intention to obstruct the investigation. Trump's actions clearly demonstrate this. Mueller laid out in the report those actions by Trump himself & by Trump's instructions to subordinates, that demonstrate Trump was active in his attempts to circumvent Mueller's function as SC. There is no debating those facts. Thus Mueller's statement, "The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."
That statement has real potential to be both politically & legally damning for Trump.

It seems that those replying to your OP either refuse to acknowledge the fact, or they are just too stupid to understand that the so called 'collusion' issue is a completely different issue than the obstruction of justice concept. No surprises though as these folks typically seem to play stupid.

If that's the best thing you morons got out of this report, you have nothing.

He could have might have thought and talked about maybe trying to possibly do something or nothing about the investigation.

So, you obviously are OK with any POTUS making massive attempts to obstruct SC investigations.

Not surprised .......

Don't assume anything, you commie hack.

He turned over documents, allowed staffers to testify without needing warrants issued.

If he ranted or thought about trying to stop the smear job against him, how is that criminal?

"Massive", lol.

The report came out, people were interviewed, documents turned over, and the best you got is a press secretary making up something pointless, and a President mad at the attempted coup started against him.

**** off.

 

[caddo kid]

'Special counsel Robert Mueller explicitly stated in his Russia investigation report that he and his team had not cleared President Donald Trump of accusations of obstruction of justice.

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state," the report read. "However, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."'

Mueller explicitly says he can't clear Trump of obstruction of justice


If Trump and his Trumpbots think the Mueller report cleared the former of obstruction of justice?

They are 100% wrong.

According to the Mueller report Trump CLEARLY had the intention to obstruct the investigation. Trump's actions clearly demonstrate this. Mueller laid out in the report those actions by Trump himself & by Trump's instructions to subordinates, that demonstrate Trump was active in his attempts to circumvent Mueller's function as SC. There is no debating those facts. Thus Mueller's statement, "The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."
That statement has real potential to be both politically & legally damning for Trump.

It seems that those replying to your OP either refuse to acknowledge the fact, or they are just too stupid to understand that the so called 'collusion' issue is a completely different issue than the obstruction of justice concept. No surprises though as these folks typically seem to play stupid.

If that's the best thing you morons got out of this report, you have nothing.

He could have might have thought and talked about maybe trying to possibly do something or nothing about the investigation.

So, you obviously are OK with any POTUS making massive attempts to obstruct SC investigations.

Not surprised .......

So, you obviously are OK with any POTUS making massive attempts to obstruct SC investigations.

Tell us about some and throw in some proof, not opinion.

Mueller sighted at least 10 instances of attempts by Trump to obstruct. It's in the report.
I'm not reading it for you, or for anyone else.
It's like home work in school; do your own.

 

[B. Kidd]

'Special counsel Robert Mueller explicitly stated in his Russia investigation report that he and his team had not cleared President Donald Trump of accusations of obstruction of justice.

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state," the report read. "However, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."'

Mueller explicitly says he can't clear Trump of obstruction of justice


If Trump and his Trumpbots think the Mueller report cleared the former of obstruction of justice?

They are 100% wrong.

"Exoneration" isn't what prosecutors do. They either indict or they don't. Mueller didn't indict on collusion or on obstruction of justice. End of story.

Yupp!
This is the political part of the report and not a prosecutorial legal determination!

 

[caddo kid]

'Special counsel Robert Mueller explicitly stated in his Russia investigation report that he and his team had not cleared President Donald Trump of accusations of obstruction of justice.

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state," the report read. "However, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."'

Mueller explicitly says he can't clear Trump of obstruction of justice


If Trump and his Trumpbots think the Mueller report cleared the former of obstruction of justice?

They are 100% wrong.

According to the Mueller report Trump CLEARLY had the intention to obstruct the investigation. Trump's actions clearly demonstrate this. Mueller laid out in the report those actions by Trump himself & by Trump's instructions to subordinates, that demonstrate Trump was active in his attempts to circumvent Mueller's function as SC. There is no debating those facts. Thus Mueller's statement, "The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."
That statement has real potential to be both politically & legally damning for Trump.

It seems that those replying to your OP either refuse to acknowledge the fact, or they are just too stupid to understand that the so called 'collusion' issue is a completely different issue than the obstruction of justice concept. No surprises though as these folks typically seem to play stupid.

If that's the best thing you morons got out of this report, you have nothing.

He could have might have thought and talked about maybe trying to possibly do something or nothing about the investigation.

So, you obviously are OK with any POTUS making massive attempts to obstruct SC investigations.

Not surprised .......

Don't assume anything, you commie hack.

He turned over documents, allowed staffers to testify without needing warrants issued.

If he ranted or thought about trying to stop the smear job against him, how is that criminal?

"Massive", lol.

The report came out, people were interviewed, documents turned over, and the best you got is a press secretary making up something pointless, and a President mad at the attempted coup started against him.

**** off.

I said not a goddamn thing about any, "press secretary."

You are the second asshole in here to accuse me of discussing something I have not mentioned.

I will assume you don't know how to ******* read.

 

[martybegan]

'Special counsel Robert Mueller explicitly stated in his Russia investigation report that he and his team had not cleared President Donald Trump of accusations of obstruction of justice.

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state," the report read. "However, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."'

Mueller explicitly says he can't clear Trump of obstruction of justice


If Trump and his Trumpbots think the Mueller report cleared the former of obstruction of justice?

They are 100% wrong.

According to the Mueller report Trump CLEARLY had the intention to obstruct the investigation. Trump's actions clearly demonstrate this. Mueller laid out in the report those actions by Trump himself & by Trump's instructions to subordinates, that demonstrate Trump was active in his attempts to circumvent Mueller's function as SC. There is no debating those facts. Thus Mueller's statement, "The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."
That statement has real potential to be both politically & legally damning for Trump.

It seems that those replying to your OP either refuse to acknowledge the fact, or they are just too stupid to understand that the so called 'collusion' issue is a completely different issue than the obstruction of justice concept. No surprises though as these folks typically seem to play stupid.

If that's the best thing you morons got out of this report, you have nothing.

He could have might have thought and talked about maybe trying to possibly do something or nothing about the investigation.

So, you obviously are OK with any POTUS making massive attempts to obstruct SC investigations.

Not surprised .......

Don't assume anything, you commie hack.

He turned over documents, allowed staffers to testify without needing warrants issued.

If he ranted or thought about trying to stop the smear job against him, how is that criminal?

"Massive", lol.

The report came out, people were interviewed, documents turned over, and the best you got is a press secretary making up something pointless, and a President mad at the attempted coup started against him.

**** off.

I said not a goddamn thing about any, "press secretary."

You are the second asshole in here to accuse me of discussing something I have not mentioned.

I will assume you don't know how to ******* read.

I was talking about the report in general, and the complete lack of actual events or crimes against Trump and others that resulted.

I am generalizing about your TDS, and the TDS of others you dime store hack.

 

[Edgetho]

Prosecutors don't clear anybody of anything.

Never have never will.

dimocraps aren't just scum, they're really, really, really, really, REALLY ******* stupid

 

[caddo kid]

According to the Mueller report Trump CLEARLY had the intention to obstruct the investigation. Trump's actions clearly demonstrate this. Mueller laid out in the report those actions by Trump himself & by Trump's instructions to subordinates, that demonstrate Trump was active in his attempts to circumvent Mueller's function as SC. There is no debating those facts. Thus Mueller's statement, "The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."
That statement has real potential to be both politically & legally damning for Trump.

It seems that those replying to your OP either refuse to acknowledge the fact, or they are just too stupid to understand that the so called 'collusion' issue is a completely different issue than the obstruction of justice concept. No surprises though as these folks typically seem to play stupid.

If that's the best thing you morons got out of this report, you have nothing.

He could have might have thought and talked about maybe trying to possibly do something or nothing about the investigation.

So, you obviously are OK with any POTUS making massive attempts to obstruct SC investigations.

Not surprised .......

Don't assume anything, you commie hack.

He turned over documents, allowed staffers to testify without needing warrants issued.

If he ranted or thought about trying to stop the smear job against him, how is that criminal?

"Massive", lol.

The report came out, people were interviewed, documents turned over, and the best you got is a press secretary making up something pointless, and a President mad at the attempted coup started against him.

**** off.

I said not a goddamn thing about any, "press secretary."

You are the second asshole in here to accuse me of discussing something I have not mentioned.

I will assume you don't know how to ******* read.

I was talking about the report in general, and the complete lack of actual events or crimes against Trump and others that resulted.

I am generalizing about your TDS, and the TDS of others you dime store hack.

You specified, "YOU" in your post to me. That was directed at me. Next time say what you mean.

I don't do generalizations. That is the lazy ass man's way to do shit.

 

[martybegan]

If that's the best thing you morons got out of this report, you have nothing.

He could have might have thought and talked about maybe trying to possibly do something or nothing about the investigation.

So, you obviously are OK with any POTUS making massive attempts to obstruct SC investigations.

Not surprised .......

Don't assume anything, you commie hack.

He turned over documents, allowed staffers to testify without needing warrants issued.

If he ranted or thought about trying to stop the smear job against him, how is that criminal?

"Massive", lol.

The report came out, people were interviewed, documents turned over, and the best you got is a press secretary making up something pointless, and a President mad at the attempted coup started against him.

**** off.

I said not a goddamn thing about any, "press secretary."

You are the second asshole in here to accuse me of discussing something I have not mentioned.

I will assume you don't know how to ******* read.

I was talking about the report in general, and the complete lack of actual events or crimes against Trump and others that resulted.

I am generalizing about your TDS, and the TDS of others you dime store hack.

You specified, "YOU" in your post to me. That was directed at me. Next time say what you mean.

I don't do generalizations. That is the lazy ass man's way to do shit.

I didn't say you talked about it, I said its the best things you got out of the report.

How about you try reading comprehension you commie fucktard?

 

[McRocket]

According to the Mueller report Trump CLEARLY had the intention to obstruct the investigation. Trump's actions clearly demonstrate this. Mueller laid out in the report those actions by Trump himself & by Trump's instructions to subordinates, that demonstrate Trump was active in his attempts to circumvent Mueller's function as SC. There is no debating those facts. Thus Mueller's statement, "The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."
That statement has real potential to be both politically & legally damning for Trump.

It seems that those replying to your OP either refuse to acknowledge the fact, or they are just too stupid to understand that the so called 'collusion' issue is a completely different issue than the obstruction of justice concept. No surprises though as these folks typically seem to play stupid.

If that's the best thing you morons got out of this report, you have nothing.

He could have might have thought and talked about maybe trying to possibly do something or nothing about the investigation.

So, you obviously are OK with any POTUS making massive attempts to obstruct SC investigations.

Not surprised .......

Don't assume anything, you commie hack.

He turned over documents, allowed staffers to testify without needing warrants issued.

If he ranted or thought about trying to stop the smear job against him, how is that criminal?

"Massive", lol.

The report came out, people were interviewed, documents turned over, and the best you got is a press secretary making up something pointless, and a President mad at the attempted coup started against him.

**** off.

I said not a goddamn thing about any, "press secretary."

You are the second asshole in here to accuse me of discussing something I have not mentioned.

I will assume you don't know how to ******* read.

I was talking about the report in general, and the complete lack of actual events or crimes against Trump and others that resulted.

I am generalizing about your TDS, and the TDS of others you dime store hack.

Sorry man...but you clearly have NO IDEA what TDS actually is:

''Trump Derangement Syndrome
The latest attempt by the alt-right to demonise anybody who thinks that maybe putting a reality TV star who's declared bankruptcy six times in charge of the country might not have been the best idea.
"So what if Trump only told the complete truth throughout 4% of his campaign, and had to settle out of court for that fraud trial, and that he reacts like a spoilt brat on Twitter to any kind of criticism? Geez, you libtard SJW snowflakes just have accept democracy won and stop exercising your right to free speech! You're so negative with your Trump Derangement Syndrome!"'

No need to thank me for the education...my pleasure.


Have a nice day.