I watched a lot more MSNBC of both conventions just to see what the lunatic commentators and pundits had to say. Switched to Fox during commercials or occasionally out of boredom, but DVRd all Fox coverage for later viewing.
Which one did you find more accurate...and why?
I know you did not address me, but since I PVR'd and watched both TV channel's coverage of both conventions, I can tell you:
I found more views of opposing the station's declared stand on FNC.
I found more hateful remarks about people opposite to the station's stand on MSNBC.
I found more minority opinion on FNC.
I found more Adam's apple on female necks on MSNBC.
I found commentators on FNC more intelligent, but then, on MSNBC there was Chris Matthews and Al Sharpton. And Sargeant Ed. And L..A..W..R..E..N..C..E.. who can't string two words together without attempting to emphasize a non-existent point. And, of course, Rachel who needs no more comment than the mere mention of his name.
I also found that FNC does not consider its mandate to refer to the commentators on MSNBC as "kids".
I also noticed that unlike Chris Matthews's Republican guests, the Democratic guests on FNC - whoever the host might have been - were given a polite and decent chance to answer a question.