and yet an average of Bush's entire term doesn't speak at all to when the downward spiral in this economy began; again, firmly during Bush's term. I guess it's hard to admit the facts when you are too busy blaming Obama for hurricanes and other assorted weather anomalies.
by the way, I didn't blame Bush. Maybe you can scroll up and discern your error. If, that is, you can figure out how to do more than blame Obama for weather patterns.
Good to see you know the blame does not belong on him
Again, using your "logic" , it is a moot point when and where unemployment started.
It is sad to think the Left and Papa Obama will not be able to take any credit if the economy turns around.
Lucky for them, since it is not likely to happen, they will not have to worry about this....
Indeed, Papa Obama is nothing more than a passive driver as our economy goes off the cliff
With your rather defensive nature of Papa Obama and his failed policies,
one does wonder why you are so sensitive ?
Hey, are you the guy in this video ?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oM8l3X_7Hkg]YouTube - ‪LEAVE BARACK ALONE!‬‏[/ame]
It's not a moot point so much as your blame Obama fixation is an albatross to your logic function. Evidence of such is your laughable tap dance around unemployment averages despite the indisputable fact regarding the timeline of the sinking economy.
But hey... if blaming Obama when a bird shits on your potato salad makes you feel better then more power to ya.
After all, FIRST you insist that Obama is to blame for the economy and then, when I correct you, you claim that he is a passive observer letting the boat sink. It's pretty clear what molds the ebb and flow of your silly little opinions.
*yawn*
Must be where to insert your foot or other things
I do believe that Papa Obama's policies are a factor in this dismal economy. I am of course being sarcastic when I refer to Papa Obama being "passive"
Of course, sarcasm is lost on the dim-witted, so your confusion is understandable.
Corrected, you mean stated your belief
Tap dance- I stand by my statement on job averages. Granted things like averages and economic terms like "real" numbers may be confusing to you, but that is your problem.
Time line or not- his average is still better. Note- even if you wanted to average in the first year of Papa Obama, Bush's average would still be better.
However, the inconsistency in your logic, if one can call it that, is pretty pathetic
Based on it, we are to believe nothing is Papa Obama's fault, in fact no President can do anything to the economy, BUT, look at when unemployment started to go up during Bush
Again, based on your logic, why would it matter?
Just like it would not matter that Bush tax cuts were cheaper, worked faster and recovered the economy after 9-11 more than Papa Obama's Pork bill has done for his economy.
See, just like that
Did you notice, it is a lot harder to sell us this "bag of goods" called Papa Obama when he actually has a record now
It was a lot easier to do when he was new. Now that he is not, the Left has to contort themselves, logically, all over the place to apply their talking points.
Funny how that works...
It may be time to get new talking points or pull out some old ones
I know, we have not seen the Race Card for awhile; it might be time to pull that one out....