Moscow propagandists are already calling Alaska "ours". my MAGA and commie friends, maybe its to Moscow empire to " find out "?

[ESay]

The ONLY reason that Russia got away with Annexation of Donbass and Crimea (and not really) was that despite the Treaty signed in '98 or '99 by the US and all of NATO they really didn't honor it. Obama really didn't care and Trump was too busy to do anything as well. (Bad advisors...Trump's fault completely for hiring them)

I don't see this remaining an issue for very long. Russia can't afford to continue the war, NATO wants the heat off of themselves for failing to fund their own militaries, and it's become a political issue around the world now.

What the next issue is going to be is Russian Government going bankrupt again. It's going to be yet another cesspool of organized crime again. A bunch of petty tyrants shooting each other in the streets over cigarettes, prostitutes, and vodka. Which then will be exported into the rest of the world. Because a few will realize they are literally fighting to be the king of the world's garbage pile.

How many times will Russia issue a new currency before one is actually accepted and stable.

The only reason why Russia got away with that is no one dared to stand up against them. Not then, not now. And all that words tinsel used in the West is no more than an attempt to hide inability and unwillingness to take decisive steps to counter Russia. The Putin regime may agree to frozen this war, because they understand full well how it impacts Russian economy and society, but they won't give away an inch of the occupied land.

 

[Litwin]

No, my propaganda-spewing $hit-stirring Ukrainian friend... Russia is NOT going to attack Alaska, California, etc.

Not even in combination with the Chinese and North Koreans and Iranians.

They lack the conventional warfare muscle to achieve and sustain air and naval superiority in that local theatre.

And they're not going to use nuclear weapons for such a foolish purpose in a distant and unsustainable effort...

Although it is in America's best interest to ensure that we are strong enough to deal with such an attack...

And although it is in Ukraine's best interest to generate or heighten American concerns over Russia's intentions...

No such attack is going to happen...

Sorry...

experts call it - "redirected aggression"

I re-posted here a) the official (RT TV ) Moscow Alaska statement b) Zavulon ´s Alaska /California (terror, hybrid warfare) plan . So instead of defend territorial integrity of Alaska against pig- dogs like Zavulon . And you call me for " propagandist ". learn how to handle the reality my old friend .

 

[Litwin]

This propaganda is being spread to hide the fact that Russia is in the process of collapsing completely again.
A prime lending rate of 28%?
There is no one who can stay in business with such a lending rate.

Anything over 18% is the death of a nation.

Then there's the rioting in Georgia (although claimed to be part of Russia)
Then there's the problem with ethnic clashes.

Russia knows its time is limited. The "Three day" SMO is destroying the entire nation.

It's going to go back to the days of being a "gas pump nation".

agree with but we must agree that we dont act like we have always acted . Look, its the Circassians uprising is out there, where is our financial & military support ? where are our anti - imperialistic (contras) camps ? we can very cheap open (today) the second front against Moscow imperialism. Dont forget that the Circassians The greatest warriors this world has seen. And they REALLY HATE Muscovite genocidal rapists .

Occupied (by 🇷🇺) Abkhazia , Circassians rebelled against the ratification of an investment agreement with Moscow empire.

all Circassians must return home, do you agree ? backgound : https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/breaking-moscow-empire-stopped-all-payment-to-abkhazia-the-empire-want-to-settle-millions-muscovites-and-stans-muslims-in-abkhazia-genocides-n2.1123405/

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Zavulon]

agree with but we must agree that we dont act like we have always acted . Look, its the Circassians uprising is out there, where is our financial & military support ? where are our anti - imperialistic (contras) camps ? we can very cheap open (today) the second front against Moscow imperialism. Dont forget that the Circassians The greatest warriors this world has seen. And they REALLY HATE Muscovite genocidal rapists .

Occupied (by 🇷🇺) Abkhazia , Circassians rebelled against the ratification of an investment agreement with Moscow empire.

all Circassians must return home, do you agree ? backgound : https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/breaking-moscow-empire-stopped-all-payment-to-abkhazia-the-empire-want-to-settle-millions-muscovites-and-stans-muslims-in-abkhazia-genocides-n2.1123405/

www.usmessageboard.com

First of all, both sides in Abkhazia are pro-Russian. Second - if the West open another front, Russia will definitely open another front against West. And this is not the thing West can allow themselves now.

 

[Zavulon]

experts call it - "redirected aggression"

I re-posted here a) the official (RT TV ) Moscow Alaska statement b) Zavulon ´s Alaska /California (terror, hybrid warfare) plan . So instead of defend territorial integrity of Alaska against pig- dogs like Zavulon . And you call me for " propagandist ". learn how to handle the reality my old friend .

It's not exactly "plan", just an illustration of possible outcomes. If America do want to take Crimea and Novorussia, Russia do want to take Alaska and California. But while both sides do understand that direct all out nuclear war is too expensive (comparing with possible profits) both sides just continue keeping what is theirs.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[JohnDB]

Short 2,500 drivers....musta been killed in Ukraine.

 

[HikerGuy83]

my MAGA and commie friends, maybe its to Moscow empire to " find out "?
Muscovites have been making that claim for over 30 years . maybe its time to invite them to try to come take it?
ps
Why Alaska? The colonization of Alaska was a project by the Moscow empire with the objective to use it as starting point for the colonization of both Americas, down to Cape Horn. After Crimean war Moscow Tsar was a Bankrupt (as Putin today) and he was very happy to sell it to the U.S.

You needed a few more choices in the poll.

Saying No doesn't necessarily think you believe Russia is to strong.

 

[Litwin]

It's not exactly "plan", just an illustration of possible outcomes.

no, its your empire´s wellington blue print , your empire have done it many times in Moldova, Azerbaijan, in Ukraine, Georgia, etc.

Short 2,500 drivers....musta been killed in Ukraine.

man, it has happened in Romanov´s empire as well in 1917

 

[Litwin]

both sides in Abkhazia are pro-Russian

in your wet imperialistic dreams,

the reality :



you dont even know , how Circassians hate you ...

Russia demands removal of Shamil Basayev photo from Abkhazian museum

Basayev is considered a ‘Hero of Abkhazia’ for his role in the 1992–1993 War in Abkhazia.

oc-media.org

 

[Litwin]

Russia will definitely open another front against West

you have done already, Africa , Latin America, Kosava, etc.

still, your horde is without chances...

 

[sparky]

my MAGA and commie friends

that you would lump these two terms together shows how little you know of each Lit

~S~

 

[Litwin]

lump these two terms together

One for sure, The far-left&right RADICALS are two sides of the same coin.

 

[Zavulon]

As it was said earlier - "To be effective deterrence must be credible, and to be credible - it should not be suicidal". It is not the question - "Can the USA destroy Moscow in unprovoked out-of-blue attack?" Yes, they can. The real questions are:
1) Can the USA attack Russia in the way, after which Russia won't be able to cause unacceptable damage to the USA? (And what level of damage is acceptable to USA in the current situation?) Answer is "no" for first question, especially if "acceptable damage" in the current situation is pretty low (and it is very low, when we are talking about Crimea and Novorussia and not about Alaska and California).
2) Can Russia attack USA in the way, after which the USA won't be able to cause unacceptable damage to Russia? (And what level of damage is acceptable to Russia in this situation?). And answer is "yes", Russia can decrease possible losses after retaliation strike of survived US nuclear forces to the level much lesser than 20 mln killed (even in pessimistic scenario) and this level is pretty acceptable, if we are speaking about Crimea and Novorussia (or even the very existence of Russian Federation) and not about Alaska and California.


So, if we are talking about details of the video....
1) Moscow, however valuable, is expendable. Napoleon burnt Moscow back in 1812, but lost the war. Biden still can burn Moscow, but, highly likely, it will mean defeat of the USA in the war and, may be, even extinction or American people.
2) 8 warheads per missile means pretty short firing distance and at this distance US SSBN are more vulnerable. Highly likely, that in the Pearl Harbour scenario (US retaliation strike) SSBNs in foward patroling areas were killed before launch.
3) Moscow's ABD can intercept at least 100 incoming warheads. Which means that typical salvo 20 missles x 3 = 60 100 kt warheads of one SSBN will be definitely intercepted.
4) If we are not talking about American out-of-blue attack against sleeping Russian cities (and this scenario is not possible because of many reasons) it means that state-essencial personal (and not city-essencial) personel will be evacuated before US retaliation strike. And city-essencial personel will be sheltered.

So, more likely, that those few survived warheads won't kill more than 100k (mostly state non-essencial) unlucky civilians in Moscow. And Russia already proved that 100k is the pretty acceptable level of losses.

 

[Zavulon]

no, its your empire´s wellington blue print , your empire have done it many times in Moldova, Azerbaijan, in Ukraine, Georgia, etc.

Russia has it done many times there where were a lot of people who hated their central government. In fact, Russia prefers to join already going civil wars. There should be real chances of success. And while the level of separatism among Alaskians and Californians is quite low (may be yet), and while Washington is ready to use nukes to defend Alaska and California - there won't be serious attempts to actually do it.

man, it has happened in Romanov´s empire as well in 1917

And in few decades Russian Empire from regional power became Soviet Union, who retake almost all lost territories and even added some new.

 

[Godboy]

If you are stupid enough to praise such things, then why you are surprised that many Muslims support a jihad against the Western world.

What they support has nothing to do with me. We are on opposing sides, which means they are on the losing side.

 

[Zavulon]

you have done already, Africa , Latin America, Kosava, etc.

still, your horde is without chances...

View attachment 1042537

It's just forepley. Almost nothing comparing with what we could and may be should do.

 

[ESay]

What they support has nothing to do with me. We are on opposing sides, which means they are on the losing side.

Tell me where you winning side showed itself the best. Afghanistan or Iraq or Syria.

 

[Godboy]

Tell me where you winning side showed itself the best. Afghanistan or Iraq or Syria.

You mean when 1-2 million muslims were killed? How many soldiers did we lose again? 3,000? I like that ratio A LOT!

 

[ESay]

You mean when 1-2 million muslims were killed? How many soldiers did we lose again? 3,000? I like that ratio A LOT!

You better count their birth ratio and how many new Muslims were born there. While 'the greatest nation on earth' is steadily losing its population due to drag addiction, domestic violence and other pleasant things and being replaced with guests from the South.