Moscow Clarifies 'Red Line' to US

[Donald H]

Moscow clarifies ‘red line’ for US

The US would cross a “red line” if it sends longer-range missiles to Kiev, Moscow has warned, adding that it would “react”

www.rt.com

Washington becomes “complicit in war crimes” by supplying weapons to Kiev, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told a media briefing on Thursday. If the US decides to supply longer-range missiles to Ukraine, “it would cross the red line and become an actual party to the conflict,” she added. ]/quote]

Is this a threat of retaliation by Russia against the US?

 

[fncceo]

Moscow clarifies ‘red line’ for US

The US would cross a “red line” if it sends longer-range missiles to Kiev, Moscow has warned, adding that it would “react”

www.rt.com

Is this a threat of retaliation by Russia against the US?

The way we reacted when Russia sent long-range missiles to Cuba?

 

[Donald H]

The way we reacted when Russia sent long-range missiles to Cuba?

You mean the way you reacted when you were told the story of how Kennedy make Kruschev back off.

You weren't told the real story until many years later.

And no, don't ask me. You can google the real story on how Kruschev won his demands.

Warning: It's very ego-deflating.

 

[occupied]

Moscow has been put on ignore until Putin accidentally falls out of a window.

 

[para bellum]

As if it matters. ATACMS would not have fallen under the INF treaty anyway. It's only a 300km range.

INF was 500-5000km.

ATACMS doesn't even fall under the MTCR- the US can sell them to whoever we want.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Moscow clarifies ‘red line’ for US

The US would cross a “red line” if it sends longer-range missiles to Kiev, Moscow has warned, adding that it would “react”

www.rt.com

Is this a threat of retaliation by Russia against the US?

Given the beating Ukraine is giving Russia in its northern counter-offensive, especially in Kharkiv, they are in no place to make threats.