Putin: Authorizing Long-Range Missile Strikes Against Russia Would Be an Act of WAR by NATO.

[excalibur]

 

[1srelluc]

Damn, I wonder if that guy on the right plays the banjo!



Sigh, I had a IH Scout like that.

 

[kyzr]

 

[Invisibleflash]

Harris, whoever is running the government, is forging a path towards all-out war.

Because we know Biden is out of it, as he has no clue. So Harris, or who? Who is pushing the world in this direction?

...​

​

Putin notes that Ukrainian drone attacks have already taken place within Russia, most recently in Moscow. However, “When it comes to using high-precision long-range Western-made weapons, it’s a completely different story.”​

​

“The Ukrainian army is not able to strike with modern long-range precision systems of Western manufacture. It cannot do this. It can only do so using intelligence from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. This is data from [European Union] satellites, or from the United States, in general from NATO,” he said.​

​

Putin believes only NATO servicemen can enter flight assignments for the missile systems, arguing the real question is whether NATO wants to be directly involved in the war in Ukraine or not.​

​

Putin’s ominous words come after Biden-Harris Secretary of State Anthony Blinken hinted that Ukraine may get the green light to use long-range missiles against Russia earlier this week.​

Putin: Authorizing Long-Range Missile Strikes Against Russia Would Be an Act of WAR by NATO.

Russia's President Vladimir Putin has flatly stated that any long-range missile strikes carried out by Ukraine against the territory of Russia will

thenationalpulse.com

It is a good way to decrease the surplus population.

 

[kyzr]

The Poles look like Trump supporters. End the fucking war before it gets out of control.

 

[skye]

Cool heads are prevailing...so far.

No change to US policy on long-range missiles to Ukraine expected Friday, White House says​

WASHINGTON, Sept 13 (Reuters) - The United States is not planning to announce any new policy on Ukraine and the use of long-range missiles on Friday, the White House said.
"There is no change to our view on the provision of long range strike capabilities for Ukraine to use inside of Russia," White House national security spokesman John Kirby told reporters. "I would not expect any major announcement in that regard," from discussions between U.S. President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Friday, Kirby said.

https://www.reuters.com/world/no-change-us-policy-long-range-missiles-ukraine-expected-friday-white-house-says-2024-09-13/

 

[Marener]

If Poland wants out of NATO, they’re more than welcome. Until then, they’re depending on us for their protection and should show some respect.

 

[wamose]

No matter how you spin it, it won't be NATO firing on Russia. It be Ukraine defending their own soverienity.

It doesn't matter what kind of rationalization you come up with for attacking Russia. Russia considers a NATO led missile attack to be an act of war. That's how it is. The bottom line for the US is, we don't have any leadership in this administration that can handle this situation. Harris and Biden think like children. Back to MAGA

 

[Vrenn]

It doesn't matter what kind of rationalization you come up with for attacking Russia. Russia considers a NATO led missile attack to be an act of war. That's how it is. The bottom line for the US is, we don't have any leadership in this administration that can handle this situation. Harris and Biden think like children. Back to MAGA

You can stop with the "Sky is Falling" routine. NATO isn't firing a single weapon on Russia.

 

[whitehall]

NATO depends on strong American leadership and that is sorely lacking today. Let's hope our increasingly mentally impaired president doesn't do something foolish in the next couple of months.

 

[Ringo]

The US and EU attempts to destroy Russia are like two gay men trying to conceive a child - the more they try, the more their asses hurt.

 

[alang1216]

Putin is warning them of another red line.....Fuck around and find out comes to mind.....Let's see what kind of appetite the EU has for an expanded war.

Putin would be perfectly justified in taking-out Uke training/marshaling facilities in EU countries if NATO gives the Ukes long range weapons.

Just Putin bluster. How many red lines have been crossed with no reaction from Russia? He is not an idiot and would not dare attack NATO. He can't even beat Ukraine, who thinks he'd have a chance against NATO?

 

[wamose]

You can stop with the "Sky is Falling" routine. NATO isn't firing a single weapon on Russia.

Wake up Qdog. Ukraine doesn't have weapons factories to replenish their stockpile. MAGA

 

[Vrenn]

Wake up Qdog. Ukraine doesn't have weapons factories to replenish their stockpile. MAGA

Well, MAGAt, most of rest of the world is selling them those weapons either cash and carry or lend lease. But as long as Russia (putin) has troops in Ukraine, he needs to feel the full wrath of war on his own country. And that is exactly what is happening.

 

[beautress]

Ukraine is showing how weak Russia is. Putin would be foolish to wake NATO into direct war. Take us about three weeks to have Putin in custody IN Moscow.

Are you thinking that if we do in Moscow NATO or the rest of the world would benefit, and if so, how. The way I see it, Russia considers the Ukraine as the future's largest prison in the galaxy. if Biden bombs Moscow for Thanksgiving or Christmas, whoever is left in charge of Mother Russia would sink North America.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Putin needs to remember his famous line: "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes".

Ukraine gave up its nukes for NATO guarantees of security via the Budapest Memorandum. NATO should admit Ukraine and negotiate an end to the war before the nukes start flying. Should NATO give Ukraine some of its nukes back?

NATO AND Russian guarantees.