More wealth redistribution by Obama boot licker Dirty Harry Reid

May 12, 2011
883
119
0
SoCal
Senate could vote on millionaire tax bill

The Senate as early as Wednesday could vote on a "Sense of the Senate" bill that says taxpayers earning $1 million or more each year should "make a more meaningful contribution to the deficit-reduction effort."

The bill, titled the "Sense of the Senate on Shared Sacrifice," was introduced last week by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). Reid filed at cloture motion on the bill on Tuesday afternoon, meaning a vote to end debate could take place as early as late Wednesday or, more likely, Thursday.

The bill has no specific recommendations on how much taxes should be raised on high-income earners, and is simply a recommendation that these taxpayers pay more. Because the 60 votes needed to end debate are unlikely to materialize, the vote will likely be used by Democrats as a way to show Republican resistance to new tax hikes.

Democrats might also try to use the vote as leverage in negotiations on how to raise the debt ceiling by showing that there is support for a tax increase. In those talks, which are expected to continue this week, Democrats have said taxes on the wealthy and on oil companies should be part of the equation for reducing the deficit. Republicans have so far rejected this, and argue that an agreement needs to focus solely on spending cuts.

Senate could vote on millionaire tax bill - The Hill's Floor Action
 
How is reverting to previous tax rates a redistribution of wealth?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
How is reverting to previous tax rates a redistribution of wealth?

Until every man is taxed at the same rate and until the 45% of Americans that pay zero in federal income tax each year finally pay their fair share, it is wealth redistribution. The progressive income tax system is un-Constitutional.
 
Last edited:
How is reverting to previous tax rates a redistribution of wealth?

Until every man is taxed at the same rate and until the 45% of Americans that pay zero in federal income tax each year finally pay their fair share, it is wealth redistribution. The progressive income tax system is un-Constitutional.

Taxes are not wealth redistribution.

Wealth is not taxed
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
How is reverting to previous tax rates a redistribution of wealth?

Until every man is taxed at the same rate and until the 45% of Americans that pay zero in federal income tax each year finally pay their fair share, it is wealth redistribution. The progressive income tax system is un-Constitutional.

Taxes are not wealth redistribution.

Wealth is not taxed

You're an idiot. You don't know shit.
 
Until every man is taxed at the same rate and until the 45% of Americans that pay zero in federal income tax each year finally pay their fair share, it is wealth redistribution. The progressive income tax system is un-Constitutional.

Taxes are not wealth redistribution.

Wealth is not taxed

You're an idiot. You don't know shit.

nice reply. should get you lots of rep from cali girl and lieability
 
How is reverting to previous tax rates a redistribution of wealth?

Until every man is taxed at the same rate and until the 45% of Americans that pay zero in federal income tax each year finally pay their fair share, it is wealth redistribution. The progressive income tax system is un-Constitutional.

Do you even know why the progressive tax system was put in? I bet you don't or choose to ignore it.

It was to create income equality. That's a lot different then socialism or whatever you want to call it. Every successful country in the world uses a progressive tax system. It works and the thriving middle class in this country over the last 50 or so years proves it.
 
If anything, taxes for the lower and middle class and maybe even the upper middle class should even probably be cut further. But I think that people at the high end - people like myself - should be paying a lot more in taxes. We have it better than we've ever had it.
Warren Buffett
 
The US economy is in the crapper preceiely because wealth is now so unevenly distributed between the supply class and the demand class.

Taxing policies are the WORST way to see to it that wealth is more evenly distributed, (actually unions were the best way to see to maintaining that kind of balance but we broke that system back in the 80s).

So about the only card left to play is in the area tax policies and social programs to aid the laboring classes.

And of course those who would pay more taxes (the investment class) doesn't much like the idea.

Who can blame them?
 
Last edited:
America has lost its moral center, what the hell happened. A few answers here: http://www.usmessageboard.com/economy/168265-wealth-redistribution.html

ga287.jpg
 
Last edited:
Until every man is taxed at the same rate and until the 45% of Americans that pay zero in federal income tax each year finally pay their fair share, it is wealth redistribution. The progressive income tax system is un-Constitutional.

Taxes are not wealth redistribution.

Wealth is not taxed

You're an idiot. You don't know shit.

Only income is taxed. The disparity in contribution is due to the gross disparity in income earned.

You want to call the tune.....you got to pay the piper
 
"We don’t need new taxes. We need new taxpayers, people that are gainfully employed, making money and paying into the tax system. Then we need a government that has the discipline to take that additional revenue and use it to pay down the debt and never grow it again."

Marco Rubio
 
"We don’t need new taxes. We need new taxpayers, people that are gainfully employed, making money and paying into the tax system. Then we need a government that has the discipline to take that additional revenue and use it to pay down the debt and never grow it again."

Marco Rubio

I don't have anything to add.

Some posts are just worthy of reposting.
 

Forum List

Back
Top