More Trump not wanting freedom of speech - wants to us RICO

frigidweirdo

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2014
Messages
55,067
Reaction score
15,221
Points
2,180

"DOJ says Trump protesters could face RICO charges for yelling at him while he was ‘trying to enjoy dinner’"

"The No. 2 official at the Department of Justice was so aghast at the idea of anti-Trump demonstrators protesting the president while he was “trying to enjoy dinner” that they could face federal anti-racketeering charges that were designed to bust up organized crime."

"Asked Tuesday how, exactly, a protester could be charged under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told CNN that the law is “available to all kinds of organizations committing crimes.”"

"“Is it sheer happenstance that individuals show up at a restaurant where the president is trying to enjoy dinner in Washington, D.C., and accost him with vile words and vile anger?” Blanche asked CNN host Kaitlan Collins."

"“And meanwhile, he’s simply trying to have dinner,” Blanche continued. “Does it mean it’s just completely random that they showed up? Maybe, maybe, but to the extent that it’s part of an organized effort to inflict harm and terror and damage to the United States, there’s potential, potential investigations there.”"

Apparently if you say bad things to Trump, it's inflicting "harm and terror and damage to the United States". Are you kidding me? If saying bad things were a crime, Trump would be a criminal (oh, wait, he is a criminal, but not for that).
 

"DOJ says Trump protesters could face RICO charges for yelling at him while he was ‘trying to enjoy dinner’"

"The No. 2 official at the Department of Justice was so aghast at the idea of anti-Trump demonstrators protesting the president while he was “trying to enjoy dinner” that they could face federal anti-racketeering charges that were designed to bust up organized crime."

"Asked Tuesday how, exactly, a protester could be charged under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told CNN that the law is “available to all kinds of organizations committing crimes.”"

"“Is it sheer happenstance that individuals show up at a restaurant where the president is trying to enjoy dinner in Washington, D.C., and accost him with vile words and vile anger?” Blanche asked CNN host Kaitlan Collins."

"“And meanwhile, he’s simply trying to have dinner,” Blanche continued. “Does it mean it’s just completely random that they showed up? Maybe, maybe, but to the extent that it’s part of an organized effort to inflict harm and terror and damage to the United States, there’s potential, potential investigations there.”"

Apparently if you say bad things to Trump, it's inflicting "harm and terror and damage to the United States". Are you kidding me? If saying bad things were a crime, Trump would be a criminal (oh, wait, he is a criminal, but not for that).n
Nope, he doesn't want free speech and his ******* follower's don't either.
 
The dimocrap FILTH party IS Organized Crime. The whole cabal.

Know why you haven't heard from The Mob recently? They're part and parcel of the dimocrap scum party. We know dimocrap scum were being bought off by the Cartels. We know that China was funneling money to dimocrap FILTH the last 30 years. We know that dimocrap scum was getting money from the Human Smuggling racket being run in Mexico during the Migrant shit-show.

dimocraps are the scum of the earth. The very best thing that could happen to them would be a RICO investigation. What SHOULD happen to them is another matter entirely



 
Not only would they lose such a case in court he would lose a TON of votes before the mid terms.

Trump won because of a view he was a moderate. Gabbard and RFK were huge to his win, they legitimized this belief. "Former Dems, come with us, don't join the power hungry Dem team".

Of course he has his base but I am seeing far more people with the words "conservative" in their bio who are against people like Stephen Miller and Pam Bondi.

I'm not even convinced Trump wants to win the Midterms. He was rolling with a layup, tariffs, deportations, child birth investments for newborns.

These are strong, brilliant moves. He has to not conflate "strong" with just "heavy handed". Just keep your promises and bring some hope.

I know I live in Canada but I need America to succeed. Not just for my impression on your nation but for all of the West.

To date, in my opinion, the highlight of his administration has been JD Vance in Europe lecturing Germany and the Brits on their abuses of free speech and such. THAT was strong.
 

"DOJ says Trump protesters could face RICO charges for yelling at him while he was ‘trying to enjoy dinner’"

"The No. 2 official at the Department of Justice was so aghast at the idea of anti-Trump demonstrators protesting the president while he was “trying to enjoy dinner” that they could face federal anti-racketeering charges that were designed to bust up organized crime."

"Asked Tuesday how, exactly, a protester could be charged under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told CNN that the law is “available to all kinds of organizations committing crimes.”"

"“Is it sheer happenstance that individuals show up at a restaurant where the president is trying to enjoy dinner in Washington, D.C., and accost him with vile words and vile anger?” Blanche asked CNN host Kaitlan Collins."

"“And meanwhile, he’s simply trying to have dinner,” Blanche continued. “Does it mean it’s just completely random that they showed up? Maybe, maybe, but to the extent that it’s part of an organized effort to inflict harm and terror and damage to the United States, there’s potential, potential investigations there.”"

Apparently if you say bad things to Trump, it's inflicting "harm and terror and damage to the United States". Are you kidding me? If saying bad things were a crime, Trump would be a criminal (oh, wait, he is a criminal, but not for that).
Good. The leftoids paying for these riots need to get hunted down and imprisoned.

Sucks to be you.
 
"DOJ says Trump protesters could face RICO charges for yelling at him while he was ‘trying to enjoy dinner’"

“Is it sheer happenstance that individuals (pluaral-means a ORG) show up at a restaurant where the president is trying to enjoy dinner in Washington, D.C., and accost him with vile words and vile anger?” Blanche asked CNN host Kaitlan Collins."

Mack The Finger doesn't understand why frigidweirdo doesn't understand the following: Maybe, maybe, but to the extent that it’s part of an organized effort to inflict harm and terror and damage to the United States, there’s potential, potential investigations there.”"

Are you kidding me?


NO !

MTF wonder if frigidweirdo knows what the word POTENTIAL means ?

I have a Pagan MC friend who did 2 years in a NY state prison just for being there who was charged under RICO. He didn't make inside the bld where the fight was.


‘HELLRAISERS’ BRAWL : L.I. BIKER-GANG RUMBLE LEAVES 1 DEAD, 10 HURT

 
Last edited:

"DOJ says Trump protesters could face RICO charges for yelling at him while he was ‘trying to enjoy dinner’"

"The No. 2 official at the Department of Justice was so aghast at the idea of anti-Trump demonstrators protesting the president while he was “trying to enjoy dinner” that they could face federal anti-racketeering charges that were designed to bust up organized crime."

"Asked Tuesday how, exactly, a protester could be charged under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told CNN that the law is “available to all kinds of organizations committing crimes.”"

"“Is it sheer happenstance that individuals show up at a restaurant where the president is trying to enjoy dinner in Washington, D.C., and accost him with vile words and vile anger?” Blanche asked CNN host Kaitlan Collins."

"“And meanwhile, he’s simply trying to have dinner,” Blanche continued. “Does it mean it’s just completely random that they showed up? Maybe, maybe, but to the extent that it’s part of an organized effort to inflict harm and terror and damage to the United States, there’s potential, potential investigations there.”"

Apparently if you say bad things to Trump, it's inflicting "harm and terror and damage to the United States". Are you kidding me? If saying bad things were a crime, Trump would be a criminal (oh, wait, he is a criminal, but not for that).
youre making me hard so please tell me more great trump achievements,,
 
Not only would they lose such a case in court he would lose a TON of votes before the mid terms.

Trump won because of a view he was a moderate. Gabbard and RFK were huge to his win, they legitimized this belief. "Former Dems, come with us, don't join the power hungry Dem team".

Of course he has his base but I am seeing far more people with the words "conservative" in their bio who are against people like Stephen Miller and Pam Bondi.

I'm not even convinced Trump wants to win the Midterms. He was rolling with a layup, tariffs, deportations, child birth investments for newborns.

These are strong, brilliant moves. He has to not conflate "strong" with just "heavy handed". Just keep your promises and bring some hope.

I know I live in Canada but I need America to succeed. Not just for my impression on your nation but for all of the West.

To date, in my opinion, the highlight of his administration has been JD Vance in Europe lecturing Germany and the Brits on their abuses of free speech and such. THAT was strong.
But will he lose votes by coming out and saying this? Doubtful, because his supporters will pretend it's a "joke" or something.
 

"DOJ says Trump protesters could face RICO charges for yelling at him while he was ‘trying to enjoy dinner’"

"The No. 2 official at the Department of Justice was so aghast at the idea of anti-Trump demonstrators protesting the president while he was “trying to enjoy dinner” that they could face federal anti-racketeering charges that were designed to bust up organized crime."

"Asked Tuesday how, exactly, a protester could be charged under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told CNN that the law is “available to all kinds of organizations committing crimes.”"

"“Is it sheer happenstance that individuals show up at a restaurant where the president is trying to enjoy dinner in Washington, D.C., and accost him with vile words and vile anger?” Blanche asked CNN host Kaitlan Collins."

"“And meanwhile, he’s simply trying to have dinner,” Blanche continued. “Does it mean it’s just completely random that they showed up? Maybe, maybe, but to the extent that it’s part of an organized effort to inflict harm and terror and damage to the United States, there’s potential, potential investigations there.”"

Apparently if you say bad things to Trump, it's inflicting "harm and terror and damage to the United States". Are you kidding me? If saying bad things were a crime, Trump would be a criminal (oh, wait, he is a criminal, but not for that).
Reminds me of the ugly days of "lawfare"...the good news is now white liberals can recoil from it as well.
 
Well he just declared Antifa a terrorist organization.

That's it, that's all.

If you think what they do is free speech, I have a million bucks in a Swiss bank account to give you.
 
Well he just declared Antifa a terrorist organization.

That's it, that's all.

If you think what they do is free speech, I have a million bucks in a Swiss bank account to give you.

My own view of freedom of speech is that it has limits.

Rioting is not a part of those limits. However this is actually more protesting the government than freedom of speech (though they seem to be fairly interconnected).

However shouting at the President is not "terrorism", never has been and never will be. If Trump wants to stop listening to them, he has to stop going to public areas or put out a wider security zones.
 
Not only would they lose such a case in court he would lose a TON of votes before the mid terms.

Trump won because of a view he was a moderate. Gabbard and RFK were huge to his win, they legitimized this belief. "Former Dems, come with us, don't join the power hungry Dem team".

Of course he has his base but I am seeing far more people with the words "conservative" in their bio who are against people like Stephen Miller and Pam Bondi.

I'm not even convinced Trump wants to win the Midterms. He was rolling with a layup, tariffs, deportations, child birth investments for newborns.

These are strong, brilliant moves. He has to not conflate "strong" with just "heavy handed". Just keep your promises and bring some hope.

I know I live in Canada but I need America to succeed. Not just for my impression on your nation but for all of the West.

To date, in my opinion, the highlight of his administration has been JD Vance in Europe lecturing Germany and the Brits on their abuses of free speech and such. THAT was strong.
That is a nonsensical view of American Politics.

Republicans lose when they become 'moderate'. Bush 41, McCain, Dole.

A 'moderate' is another way of describing a sellout to the scum of the earth dimocrap FILTH party. We, Americans, understand something you in Canada can't seem to get through your thick skulls -- Leftists are scum. In any form, any capacity. They are scum.

Which wouldn't be all that bad. Most Politicians are scumbags. But what makes it unacceptable is -- Leftist scum are also incompetent.

I remember when Canada had a stronger economy than ours. When it was under Conservative Leadership. Now, Canada is something of a running Joke. Irrelevant. Only your Elites are managing while the rest of your citizenry struggles to get by paycheck to paycheck.

It isn't just that leftists are scum (they are) and it isn't just that leftists are stupid (they are that in spades) it's the fact that leftists are incompetent and can't run anything.

So, you want us to compromise with scum, stupidity and incompetence?

I'll pass, thank you. Say Hello to Castreau for us.

1758157193774.webp


:boobies: :auiqs.jpg: :boobies:
 
That is a nonsensical view of American Politics.

Republicans lose when they become 'moderate'. Bush, McCain, Dole.

A 'moderate' is another way of describing a sellout to the scum of the earth dimocrap FILTH party. We, Americans, understand something you in Canada can't seem to get through your thick skulls -- Leftists are scum. In any form, any capacity. They are scum.

Which wouldn't be all that bad. Most Politicians are scumbags. But what makes it unacceptable is -- Leftist scum are also incompetent.

I remember when Canada had a stronger economy than ours. When it was under Conservative Leadership. Now, Canada is something of a running Joke. Irrelevant. Only your Elites are managing while the rest of your citizenry struggles to get by paycheck to paycheck.

It isn't just that leftists are scum (they are) and it isn't just leftists are stupid (they are that in spades) it's the fact that leftists are incompetent and can't run anything.

So, you want us to compromise with scum, stupidity and incompetence?

I'll pass, thank you. Say Hello to Castreau for us.

View attachment 1163320

:boobies: :auiqs.jpg: :boobies:
You think Bushes were moderate?

McCain would still be voting to bomb deserts if he were alive and in congress.
 

"DOJ says Trump protesters could face RICO charges for yelling at him while he was ‘trying to enjoy dinner’"

"The No. 2 official at the Department of Justice was so aghast at the idea of anti-Trump demonstrators protesting the president while he was “trying to enjoy dinner” that they could face federal anti-racketeering charges that were designed to bust up organized crime."

"Asked Tuesday how, exactly, a protester could be charged under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told CNN that the law is “available to all kinds of organizations committing crimes.”"

"“Is it sheer happenstance that individuals show up at a restaurant where the president is trying to enjoy dinner in Washington, D.C., and accost him with vile words and vile anger?” Blanche asked CNN host Kaitlan Collins."

"“And meanwhile, he’s simply trying to have dinner,” Blanche continued. “Does it mean it’s just completely random that they showed up? Maybe, maybe, but to the extent that it’s part of an organized effort to inflict harm and terror and damage to the United States, there’s potential, potential investigations there.”"

Apparently if you say bad things to Trump, it's inflicting "harm and terror and damage to the United States". Are you kidding me? If saying bad things were a crime, Trump would be a criminal (oh, wait, he is a criminal, but not for that).
He wants to US RICO?
 
15th post
You think Bushes were moderate?

McCain would still be voting to bomb deserts if he were alive and in congress.
Precisely. War is what dimocrap scum do. It's how they get rich. It's how they gain more and more power. Any time any Country is involved in a War, that Government takes more power.

Even Rome appointed a "Dictator" when they were at War. But they had enough sense to limit their time in Power. Few people know this but Rome HATED Kings and Emperors. Until Caesar. Long story.

WW1.... dimocrap scumbag. One of the absolute worst ever. Total piece of shit. WW2... FDR. FDR re-made America into what it is today. A mess. Korea -- Truman. Viet Nam -- JFK.

The Dicksucker (some call him 'obama' which he was never, he was the Bastard of Frank Marshall Davis) had more troops in more Countries than at any time since Viet Nam.

Biden got us into deep Kimchee with Iran, gave away Asscrackistan, armed the Houthis. And here's the Biggie -- Sponge Brains Shits Pants flat out TOLD the Russians to Invade Ukraine. Or has that slipped your mind? Then there was the goat fuckers and their paraglide invasion of Israel, for which I hope the IDF wipes them from the Earth. Peace is antithetical to dimocrap scum. dimocrap FILTH are too stupid and too corrupt to make Peace work. That takes skill and dimcrap scum are too stupid.

Trump has stopped 6 wars so far. But you won't hear or read about it if you rely on the DISGUSTING FILTH.

Republicans HATE War.

Because we're usually the ones fighting and dying in them. While dimocrap FILTH run and hide in Canada.
 
Nope, he doesn't want free speech and his ******* follower's don't either.
Free speech means the ability to express ideas and beliefs without fear of punitive consequences.

Shouting at people, harassing people, and in general causing a disruption is not "free speech." It is rude, crude, and socially unacceptable.

Your poor parenting probably prevents you from knowing the difference.
 
Back
Top Bottom