More than 99.9% of peer reviewed studies show that humans are the primary cause of global warming

[Fort Fun Indiana]

matter of fact, the Democrats in America defend the enormous polluter China.

Worthless lie

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No, we need a large reduction in CO2 in our atmosphere.

Chain yourself to the Chinese Embassy

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Chain yourself to the Chinese Embassy

Or smarter people will come up with better ideas.

 

[ding]

Or smarter people will come up with better ideas.

Sort of like God of the Gaps?

 

[Robert W]

No they don't. Your paranoid delusions arise from ignorance and a crybaby tantrum over the science not showing what you want it to show.

No this is also peer reviewed.

Peer-reviewed papers by climate skeptics

Examines the science and arguments of global warming skepticism. Common objections like 'global warming is caused by the sun', 'temperature has changed naturally in the past' or 'other planets are warming too' are examined to see what the science really says.

skepticalscience.com

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Sort of like God of the Gaps?

No silly, the opposite of that.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Or smarter people will come up with better ideas.

Like deface works of art in a museum or stop traffic? Yeah, but you're not a Cult

Sure

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No this is also peer reviewed.

Peer-reviewed papers by climate skeptics

Examines the science and arguments of global warming skepticism. Common objections like 'global warming is caused by the sun', 'temperature has changed naturally in the past' or 'other planets are warming too' are examined to see what the science really says.

skepticalscience.com

Oh look, an article you didn't read. What do you imagine it says?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Like deface works of art in a museum or stop traffic? Yeah, but you're not a Cult

Sure

No, like better alt energy. Expand your mind a little bit, you are stuck in a low IQ rut.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No, like better alt energy. Expand your mind a little bit, you are stuck in a low IQ rut.

Nuclear energy and Thorium reactors

You and your windmills oy vey!

 

[jc456]

You must be a mouth breather.

You breathe through your eyebrows?

 

[jc456]

No, we need a large reduction in CO2 in our atmosphere.

Why? What problem exists?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Why is China building 2 dirty coal plants - a week? While we're fucking around with cow farts and windmills??

 

[jc456]

Why is China building 2 dirty coal plants - a week? While we're fucking around with cow farts and windmills??

I’d just like one of these chicken littles to tell us what they are afraid of

 

[Rigby5]

No this is also peer reviewed.

Peer-reviewed papers by climate skeptics

Examines the science and arguments of global warming skepticism. Common objections like 'global warming is caused by the sun', 'temperature has changed naturally in the past' or 'other planets are warming too' are examined to see what the science really says.

skepticalscience.com

But when I go to the link, all the claims by skeptics are disproved and explained.

 

[Rigby5]

Why? What problem exists?

The problem that exists is that a huge amount of solar energy is constantly hitting the planet earth, and once it hits the planet, it can only leave the planet by photonic infrared radiation.
But carbon in the upper atmosphere will absorb infrared radiation and turn it into vibratory heat, which then can not leave the planet. That is because space if a vacuum, and can not conduct heat.

 

[Orangecat]

No, we need a large reduction in CO2 in our atmosphere.

"We" don't need anything, kid. You sound like you want to be king or dictator. Tough shit.
If you want to cut down on your CO2 production, have at it. In the meantime, I will continue living an unparanoid and productive life. You have no say in it.

 

[jc456]

The problem that exists is that a huge amount of solar energy is constantly hitting the planet earth, and once it hits the planet, it can only leave the planet by photonic infrared radiation.
But carbon in the upper atmosphere will absorb infrared radiation and turn it into vibratory heat, which then can not leave the planet. That is because space if a vacuum, and can not conduct heat.

Huge? Quantitative and normal for as long as we exist

 

[Markle]

More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change | Cornell Chronicle

More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is mainly caused by humans, according to a new survey of 88,125 climate-related studies.

news.cornell.edu

AND

Radware Bot Manager Captcha

Abstract​

While controls over the Earth's climate system have undergone rigorous hypothesis-testing since the 1800s, questions over the scientific consensus of the role of human activities in modern climate change continue to arise in public settings. We update previous efforts to quantify the scientific consensus on climate change by searching the recent literature for papers sceptical of anthropogenic-caused global warming. From a dataset of 88125 climate-related papers published since 2012, when this question was last addressed comprehensively, we examine a randomized subset of 3000 such publications. We also use a second sample-weighted approach that was specifically biased with keywords to help identify any sceptical peer-reviewed papers in the whole dataset. We identify four sceptical papers out of the sub-set of 3000, as evidenced by abstracts that were rated as implicitly or explicitly sceptical of human-caused global warming. In our sample utilizing pre-identified sceptical keywords we found 28 papers that were implicitly or explicitly sceptical. We conclude with high statistical confidence that the scientific consensus on human-caused contemporary climate change—expressed as a proportion of the total publications—exceeds 99% in the peer reviewed scientific literature.

---

The consensus means something. For all practical purposes, there is no longer ANY scientific debate on the primary cause of global warming.

 

[BackAgain]

No, like better alt energy. Expand your mind a little bit, you are stuck in a low IQ rut.

Farty would have to climb mountains to reach the depths of a low IQ rut.