More Strong Evidence for Evolution: Anatomical Vestiges

abu afak

ALLAH SNACKBAR!
Mar 3, 2006
7,209
2,559
315
Kwazy Kweationist Deniers say there's "No evidence".
This is one of the best of an Overwhelming body of such.
People get convicted of crimes, including murder, 'beyond a reasonable doubt' on cases that are not as strong as the one for Evo.
Good circumstantial cases are better than eyewitness ones. The latter being the "proof" kweationists goofily demand.

With these Vestiges, DNA, etc, life can traced to a continuum, with many creatures, including us and other MAMMALS, having anatomical vestiges of our evolutionary ancestors.
An 'immaculate' creation event wouldn't leave useless organs/etc.

Article heavily edited. Only about 5% here, and no pix.

29+ Evidences for Macroevolution
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: Part 2
Douglas Theobald, Ph.D.
Prediction 2.1: Anatomical vestiges

[....]Geoffroy was at a loss for why exactly nature "always leaves vestiges of an organ", yet he could not deny his empirical observations. Ten years later, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829) identified several vestigial structures in his Zoological Philosophy.
[....] these "Hypocritical" structures profess something that they do Not do-they clearly appear designed for a certain function which they do Not perform. However, Common Descent provides a scientific explanation for these peculiar structures. Existing species have different structures and perform different functions. If all living organisms descended from a common ancestor, then both functions and structures necessarily have been gained and lost in each lineage during Macroevolutionary history. Therefore, from Common Descent and the constraint of gradualism, we predict that many organisms should retain vestigial structures as structural remnants of lost functions....

Confirmation:
.....For example..independent phylogenetic evidence, snakes are known to be the descendants of four-legged reptiles. Most Pythons (legless snakes) carry Vestigial Pelvises hidden beneath their skin.. The Vestigial pelvis in Pythons is Not attached to vertebrae (as the normal case in most vertebrates), and it simply floats in the abdominal cavity. Some lizards carry rudimentary, Vestigial Legs underneath their skin, undetectable from the outside...Many cave dwelling animals, such as the fish Astyanax mexicanus (Mexican tetra)... are blind yet have rudimentary, Vestigial eyes....
[....]
The ancestors of Humans are known to have been Herbivorous, and molar teeth are required for chewing and grinding plant material. Over 90% of all adult humans develop third molars (otherwise known as Wisdom Teeth).
Usually these teeth never erupt from the gums, and in one Third of all individuals they are Malformed and Impacted. These Useless teeth can cause significant pain, increased risk for injury, and may result in illness and even death.

Another Vestige of our Herbivorous ancestry is the vermiform appendix. While this intestinal structure may retain a function of some sort, perhaps in the development of the immune system, it is a rudimentary version of the much larger caecum that is essential for digestion of plants in other mammals..."

Yet another human Vestigial structure is the Coccyx, the four fused caudal vertebrae found at the base of the spine, exactly where most mammals and many other primates have external Tails protruding from the back. Humans and other apes are some of the only vertebrates that lack an external tail as an adult. The coccyx is a developmental Remnant of the embryonic tail that forms in humans and then is degraded and eaten by our immune system ... Our internal tail is Unnecessary for sitting, walking, and elimination (all of which are functions attributed to the coccyx by many anti-evolutionists). The caudal vertebrae of the coccyx can cause extreme and unnecessary chronic pain in some unfortunate people, a condition called coccydynia. The entire coccyx can be surgically removed without any ill effects..
[.....]​
 
Last edited:
evolution is a theory
creation/god/etc is just a belief
the creationist say evolution is just too unbelievable/couldn't happen
but the creationist believe a fully formed human just appeared--like THAT is believable
:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
 
evolution is a theory
creation/god/etc is just a belief
the creationist say evolution is just too unbelievable/couldn't happen
but the creationist believe a fully formed human just appeared--like THAT is believable
:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
And what kind of explanation would be believable? Design by an alien intelligence?
Multiple universes where we just happen to find ourselves in the one that makes life possible?
Why can’t we simply accept the ‘miracle’ of life and get on with the job of preserving it. A task we’re failing miserably at.
 
evolution is a theory
creation/god/etc is just a belief
the creationist say evolution is just too unbelievable/couldn't happen
but the creationist believe a fully formed human just appeared--like THAT is believable
:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
And what kind of explanation would be believable? Design by an alien intelligence?
Multiple universes where we just happen to find ourselves in the one that makes life possible?
Why can’t we simply accept the ‘miracle’ of life and get on with the job of preserving it. A task we’re failing miserably at.
evolution is believable /sensible --makes more sense than creation
 
evolution is a theory
creation/god/etc is just a belief
the creationist say evolution is just too unbelievable/couldn't happen
but the creationist believe a fully formed human just appeared--like THAT is believable
:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
And what kind of explanation would be believable? Design by an alien intelligence?
Multiple universes where we just happen to find ourselves in the one that makes life possible?
Why can’t we simply accept the ‘miracle’ of life and get on with the job of preserving it. A task we’re failing miserably at.
evolution is believable /sensible --makes more sense than creation
Nothing about the creation myth ( there's a lot more than the Judeo-Christian one) makes any sense.
List of creation myths - Wikipedia
 
Why can’t we simply accept the ‘miracle’ of life and get on with the job of preserving it.
Because scientists don't throw up their arms and give up, when they don't know things.
Indeed but if we don’t soon start paying more attention to the survival of life on this planet we wont be around long enough to answer other questions.
Okay, but who is "we"? Scientists?
Scientists don’t operate in a vacuum. If a majority of the population don’t support their efforts funding vanishes. (totalitarian regimes excepted) Smaller scale research with market or military potential may be given backing but broad scale environmental research seldom attracts such support. So, ‘WE’ is them, us and scientists.
 
There is no system of human evolution
If so humans could not have advanced to dominate all life forms

No animal has evolved to stop human increasing dominance which proves evolution is not true

No genes has mutated to stop the increase of dominance why? Because humans were made at creation to dominate the world
 
If a majority of the population don’t support their efforts funding vanishes.
Hmm, not really. Do you even know what studies are funded by governments and universities? No...so how could you or the public even have an opinion on them?
 
No animal has evolved to stop human increasing dominance which proves evolution is not true
This is stupid. No animal evolved to stop the dominance of the largest dinosaurs, either. But we know evolution is a fact, regardless.

Wrong.

At creation humans intelligence was the same as today. Their intelligence did not evolve to become greater what changed was the life cycle system set up of humans advancing by a 3 step forward and 2 steps back type of system

When liberalism comes it gets destroyed and we begin the next cycle

Our advancement has us keeping some progress after losing even more progress

We add onto the 1 step progress we make in a life cycle to keep us advancing

That advancing is not intellect evolving as one can see how the democrat voters votes in their worst enemy


So no evolving intellect
 
No animal has evolved to stop human increasing dominance which proves evolution is not true
This is stupid. No animal evolved to stop the dominance of the largest dinosaurs, either. But we know evolution is a fact, regardless.

Dinosaurs never advanced to beat all life forms

How fast can they move. How fast can humans move ??

Only humans are designed to be different and to become gods of the universe
 
There is no system of human evolution
If so humans could not have advanced to dominate all life forms

No animal has evolved to stop human increasing dominance which proves evolution is not true

No genes has mutated to stop the increase of dominance why? Because humans were made at creation to dominate the world
Hallelujah! Spoken like a true believer ! Hang around a while and you’ll see our species vanish from the planet due to our suicidal ignorance with only cockroaches left.
No doubt though you believe we’ll all be taken up in the rapture before we self destruct.
Can I suggest, in the kindest possible way, you put some mental effort into learning what the term ‘proves’ actually means?
 
There is no system of human evolution
If so humans could not have advanced to dominate all life forms

No animal has evolved to stop human increasing dominance which proves evolution is not true

No genes has mutated to stop the increase of dominance why? Because humans were made at creation to dominate the world
Hallelujah! Spoken like a true believer ! Hang around a while and you’ll see our species vanish from the planet due to our suicidal ignorance with only cockroaches left.
No doubt though you believe we’ll all be taken up in the rapture before we self destruct.
Can I suggest, in the kindest possible way, you put some mental effort into learning what the term ‘proves’ actually means?

Wrong again


Only 1 life form out of trillions has truly advanced.

Also the human immune system is pre wired at creation to get help if a believer in a god

An atheists immune system is pre wired to get correction pains from a weaker immune system

Humans was pre wired to go on a journey to know and find God.

Pre wired to harness all the power of the universe and be gods of the universe
 
Creationism doesn't create useless, vestigial organs.

Marriage does.
 
Stupid for atheists to suffer with their belief. They were pre wired to suffer at creation

Humans pre wired to harness all the power of the universe
 
Wrong again
Only 1 life form out of trillions has truly advanced.
Also the human immune system is pre wired at creation to get help if a believer in a god
An atheists immune system is pre wired to get correction pains from a weaker immune system
Humans was pre wired to go on a journey to know and find God.
Pre wired to harness all the power of the universe and be gods of the universe
If your ‘logic’ is an example, evolution can run backwards.
You almost get near the truth when you say "Humans was pre wired to go on a journey to know and find God.” if we replace ’to know’ with ’to suffer the delusion their is a God’.
Atheists immune system? What are you on? Let me know so as I can avoid ever taking it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top