Starting off an argument by emphasizing that he's a double major in two fields of study, neither of which has anything to do with his point, was the first indication this guy was about to say something really stupid. Also, citing your credentials and awards before making an argument is a classic logical fallacy called "appeal to authority," although this guy completely botched it in any case.
The second idiotic thing he said in the very first sentence out of his mouth was calling himself a mathematician and a physicist because he's a double major. Um, no. You're taking undergrad classes, dude. You're no more "a mathematician and a physicist" than an college student taking premed classes is a doctor, or an accounting major is a CPA. You can literally change your major to anything during drop/add each semester at most universities.
Then as soon as he gets corrected on his first objectively inaccurate statement about what Ben said regarding DSM4 vs DSM5, he jumps straight to ad hominem (his 2nd use of a logical fallacy in only 30 seconds): "bro you sound like a bozo...you get no pussy, and you can't even make your wife wet."
Ben is right, if anyone actually gave this person an award for scientific study, they should immediately revoke it. And publicly apologize for every person who had a say in the decision to select this idiot for the award in the first place. Lol