Yeah, because a reporter being called on the phone by some informer isn't anecdotal!
Nurses read names of colleagues who died of COVID-19 in protest outside White House
National Nurses United organized the protest to call attention to the thousands of health care workers who were infected by the coronavirus.www.usatoday.com
Why can't you look this up yourself?
And spoil anecdotal testimony? WTF!
I'm sure some people, including nurses, die from old age or various causes.
Yeah, because a reporter being called on the phone by some informer isn't anecdotal!
Nurses read names of colleagues who died of COVID-19 in protest outside White House
National Nurses United organized the protest to call attention to the thousands of health care workers who were infected by the coronavirus.www.usatoday.com
Why can't you look this up yourself?
And spoil anecdotal testimony? WTF!
Brietbart is a GW loving, neo-Con piece of shit.Yeah, because a reporter being called on the phone by some informer isn't anecdotal!
Nurses read names of colleagues who died of COVID-19 in protest outside White House
National Nurses United organized the protest to call attention to the thousands of health care workers who were infected by the coronavirus.www.usatoday.com
Why can't you look this up yourself?
And spoil anecdotal testimony? WTF!
Life being stranger than fiction, reporters actually do attempt to check facts, Brietbart notwithstanding, and they frequently offer anecdotes in the guise of, 'according to' or 'she said'. Anecdotes relay a narrative, not a fact.
Brietbart is a GW loving, neo-Con piece of shit.Yeah, because a reporter being called on the phone by some informer isn't anecdotal!
Nurses read names of colleagues who died of COVID-19 in protest outside White House
National Nurses United organized the protest to call attention to the thousands of health care workers who were infected by the coronavirus.www.usatoday.com
Why can't you look this up yourself?
And spoil anecdotal testimony? WTF!
Life being stranger than fiction, reporters actually do attempt to check facts, Brietbart notwithstanding, and they frequently offer anecdotes in the guise of, 'according to' or 'she said'. Anecdotes relay a narrative, not a fact.
You believe every report you get that "some unidentified person" working in an institution called "an honest and responsible person" to report to a Click Hungry media outlet that something happened that makes Trump evil.
That's called an anecdote, you moron.
Brietbart is a GW loving, neo-Con piece of shit.Yeah, because a reporter being called on the phone by some informer isn't anecdotal!
Nurses read names of colleagues who died of COVID-19 in protest outside White House
National Nurses United organized the protest to call attention to the thousands of health care workers who were infected by the coronavirus.www.usatoday.com
Why can't you look this up yourself?
And spoil anecdotal testimony? WTF!
Life being stranger than fiction, reporters actually do attempt to check facts, Brietbart notwithstanding, and they frequently offer anecdotes in the guise of, 'according to' or 'she said'. Anecdotes relay a narrative, not a fact.
You believe every report you get that "some unidentified person" working in an institution called "an honest and responsible person" to report to a Click Hungry media outlet that something happened that makes Trump evil.
That's called an anecdote, you moron.
QUOTE="joaquinmiller, post: 24514453, member: 45560"]
Brietbart is a GW loving, neo-Con piece of shit.Yeah, because a reporter being called on the phone by some informer isn't anecdotal!
Nurses read names of colleagues who died of COVID-19 in protest outside White House
National Nurses United organized the protest to call attention to the thousands of health care workers who were infected by the coronavirus.www.usatoday.com
Why can't you look this up yourself?
And spoil anecdotal testimony? WTF!
Life being stranger than fiction, reporters actually do attempt to check facts, Brietbart notwithstanding, and they frequently offer anecdotes in the guise of, 'according to' or 'she said'. Anecdotes relay a narrative, not a fact.
You believe every report you get that "some unidentified person" working in an institution called "an honest and responsible person" to report to a Click Hungry media outlet that something happened that makes Trump evil.
That's called an anecdote, you moron.
That's called your stupid ******* opinion, dummy.
[/QUOTE
It's called a factual sequence of that you ignore because you hate Trump.
Take a piece of paper and draw a flow chart from every article you read and describe every box, including who said what to whom.
If that doesn't tell you what is fact and what is hate, that's your problem, not my problem.
My impression of you comes in only one form...QUOTE="joaquinmiller, post: 24514453, member: 45560"]
Brietbart is a GW loving, neo-Con piece of shit.Yeah, because a reporter being called on the phone by some informer isn't anecdotal!
Nurses read names of colleagues who died of COVID-19 in protest outside White House
National Nurses United organized the protest to call attention to the thousands of health care workers who were infected by the coronavirus.www.usatoday.com
Why can't you look this up yourself?
And spoil anecdotal testimony? WTF!
Life being stranger than fiction, reporters actually do attempt to check facts, Brietbart notwithstanding, and they frequently offer anecdotes in the guise of, 'according to' or 'she said'. Anecdotes relay a narrative, not a fact.
You believe every report you get that "some unidentified person" working in an institution called "an honest and responsible person" to report to a Click Hungry media outlet that something happened that makes Trump evil.
That's called an anecdote, you moron.
That's called your stupid ******* opinion, dummy.
[/QUOTE
It's called a factual sequence of that you ignore because you hate Trump.
Take a piece of paper and draw a flow chart from every article you read and describe every box, including who said what to whom.
If that doesn't tell you what is fact and what is hate, that's your problem, not my problem.
You do it. It's your claim, and it has nothing to do with me, other than I think Trump is unfit for the office he holds. I don't hate him, although I certainly don't respect or admire him.
I do get tired of people trying to assign negative motivations to me and others. I didn't think you were lying when you said you didn't know any nurses who had died. I just thought that personal tidbit wasn't particularly relevant to the big picture. I do now think you're an irritating little dick.
My impression of you comes in only one form...QUOTE="joaquinmiller, post: 24514453, member: 45560"]
Brietbart is a GW loving, neo-Con piece of shit.Yeah, because a reporter being called on the phone by some informer isn't anecdotal!
Nurses read names of colleagues who died of COVID-19 in protest outside White House
National Nurses United organized the protest to call attention to the thousands of health care workers who were infected by the coronavirus.www.usatoday.com
Why can't you look this up yourself?
And spoil anecdotal testimony? WTF!
Life being stranger than fiction, reporters actually do attempt to check facts, Brietbart notwithstanding, and they frequently offer anecdotes in the guise of, 'according to' or 'she said'. Anecdotes relay a narrative, not a fact.
You believe every report you get that "some unidentified person" working in an institution called "an honest and responsible person" to report to a Click Hungry media outlet that something happened that makes Trump evil.
That's called an anecdote, you moron.
That's called your stupid ******* opinion, dummy.
[/QUOTE
It's called a factual sequence of that you ignore because you hate Trump.
Take a piece of paper and draw a flow chart from every article you read and describe every box, including who said what to whom.
If that doesn't tell you what is fact and what is hate, that's your problem, not my problem.
You do it. It's your claim, and it has nothing to do with me, other than I think Trump is unfit for the office he holds. I don't hate him, although I certainly don't respect or admire him.
I do get tired of people trying to assign negative motivations to me and others. I didn't think you were lying when you said you didn't know any nurses who had died. I just thought that personal tidbit wasn't particularly relevant to the big picture. I do now think you're an irritating little dick.
What you post.
I am irritating to people who don't me pointing out their inability to communicate facts withing context.
That's why you consider me an irritating little dick.
I'm pleased that I show others with an IQ above 0 how you are persuaded by nonsense.
Stop...just stop.My impression of you comes in only one form...QUOTE="joaquinmiller, post: 24514453, member: 45560"]
Brietbart is a GW loving, neo-Con piece of shit.Yeah, because a reporter being called on the phone by some informer isn't anecdotal!
Nurses read names of colleagues who died of COVID-19 in protest outside White House
National Nurses United organized the protest to call attention to the thousands of health care workers who were infected by the coronavirus.www.usatoday.com
Why can't you look this up yourself?
And spoil anecdotal testimony? WTF!
Life being stranger than fiction, reporters actually do attempt to check facts, Brietbart notwithstanding, and they frequently offer anecdotes in the guise of, 'according to' or 'she said'. Anecdotes relay a narrative, not a fact.
You believe every report you get that "some unidentified person" working in an institution called "an honest and responsible person" to report to a Click Hungry media outlet that something happened that makes Trump evil.
That's called an anecdote, you moron.
That's called your stupid ******* opinion, dummy.
[/QUOTE
It's called a factual sequence of that you ignore because you hate Trump.
Take a piece of paper and draw a flow chart from every article you read and describe every box, including who said what to whom.
If that doesn't tell you what is fact and what is hate, that's your problem, not my problem.
You do it. It's your claim, and it has nothing to do with me, other than I think Trump is unfit for the office he holds. I don't hate him, although I certainly don't respect or admire him.
I do get tired of people trying to assign negative motivations to me and others. I didn't think you were lying when you said you didn't know any nurses who had died. I just thought that personal tidbit wasn't particularly relevant to the big picture. I do now think you're an irritating little dick.
What you post.
I am irritating to people who don't me pointing out their inability to communicate facts withing context.
That's why you consider me an irritating little dick.
I'm pleased that I show others with an IQ above 0 how you are persuaded by nonsense.
You think you've done that? Really? Well, no praise like self-praise, I suppose.
Ask yourself why you are spending time posting ad hominems and not analyzing the article.My impression of you comes in only one form...QUOTE="joaquinmiller, post: 24514453, member: 45560"]
Brietbart is a GW loving, neo-Con piece of shit.Yeah, because a reporter being called on the phone by some informer isn't anecdotal!
Nurses read names of colleagues who died of COVID-19 in protest outside White House
National Nurses United organized the protest to call attention to the thousands of health care workers who were infected by the coronavirus.www.usatoday.com
Why can't you look this up yourself?
And spoil anecdotal testimony? WTF!
Life being stranger than fiction, reporters actually do attempt to check facts, Brietbart notwithstanding, and they frequently offer anecdotes in the guise of, 'according to' or 'she said'. Anecdotes relay a narrative, not a fact.
You believe every report you get that "some unidentified person" working in an institution called "an honest and responsible person" to report to a Click Hungry media outlet that something happened that makes Trump evil.
That's called an anecdote, you moron.
That's called your stupid ******* opinion, dummy.
[/QUOTE
It's called a factual sequence of that you ignore because you hate Trump.
Take a piece of paper and draw a flow chart from every article you read and describe every box, including who said what to whom.
If that doesn't tell you what is fact and what is hate, that's your problem, not my problem.
You do it. It's your claim, and it has nothing to do with me, other than I think Trump is unfit for the office he holds. I don't hate him, although I certainly don't respect or admire him.
I do get tired of people trying to assign negative motivations to me and others. I didn't think you were lying when you said you didn't know any nurses who had died. I just thought that personal tidbit wasn't particularly relevant to the big picture. I do now think you're an irritating little dick.
What you post.
I am irritating to people who don't me pointing out their inability to communicate facts withing context.
That's why you consider me an irritating little dick.
I'm pleased that I show others with an IQ above 0 how you are persuaded by nonsense.
You think you've done that? Really? Well, no praise like self-praise, I suppose.
Ask
Ask yourself why you are spending time posting ad hominems and not analyzing the article.My impression of you comes in only one form...QUOTE="joaquinmiller, post: 24514453, member: 45560"]
Brietbart is a GW loving, neo-Con piece of shit.Yeah, because a reporter being called on the phone by some informer isn't anecdotal!
Nurses read names of colleagues who died of COVID-19 in protest outside White House
National Nurses United organized the protest to call attention to the thousands of health care workers who were infected by the coronavirus.www.usatoday.com
Why can't you look this up yourself?
And spoil anecdotal testimony? WTF!
Life being stranger than fiction, reporters actually do attempt to check facts, Brietbart notwithstanding, and they frequently offer anecdotes in the guise of, 'according to' or 'she said'. Anecdotes relay a narrative, not a fact.
You believe every report you get that "some unidentified person" working in an institution called "an honest and responsible person" to report to a Click Hungry media outlet that something happened that makes Trump evil.
That's called an anecdote, you moron.
That's called your stupid ******* opinion, dummy.
[/QUOTE
It's called a factual sequence of that you ignore because you hate Trump.
Take a piece of paper and draw a flow chart from every article you read and describe every box, including who said what to whom.
If that doesn't tell you what is fact and what is hate, that's your problem, not my problem.
You do it. It's your claim, and it has nothing to do with me, other than I think Trump is unfit for the office he holds. I don't hate him, although I certainly don't respect or admire him.
I do get tired of people trying to assign negative motivations to me and others. I didn't think you were lying when you said you didn't know any nurses who had died. I just thought that personal tidbit wasn't particularly relevant to the big picture. I do now think you're an irritating little dick.
What you post.
I am irritating to people who don't me pointing out their inability to communicate facts withing context.
That's why you consider me an irritating little dick.
I'm pleased that I show others with an IQ above 0 how you are persuaded by nonsense.
You think you've done that? Really? Well, no praise like self-praise, I suppose.
Perhaps I called you a moron because you're constantly following your emotions and never following facts.Ask
Ask yourself why you are spending time posting ad hominems and not analyzing the article.My impression of you comes in only one form...QUOTE="joaquinmiller, post: 24514453, member: 45560"]
Brietbart is a GW loving, neo-Con piece of shit.Yeah, because a reporter being called on the phone by some informer isn't anecdotal!
Nurses read names of colleagues who died of COVID-19 in protest outside White House
National Nurses United organized the protest to call attention to the thousands of health care workers who were infected by the coronavirus.www.usatoday.com
Why can't you look this up yourself?
And spoil anecdotal testimony? WTF!
Life being stranger than fiction, reporters actually do attempt to check facts, Brietbart notwithstanding, and they frequently offer anecdotes in the guise of, 'according to' or 'she said'. Anecdotes relay a narrative, not a fact.
You believe every report you get that "some unidentified person" working in an institution called "an honest and responsible person" to report to a Click Hungry media outlet that something happened that makes Trump evil.
That's called an anecdote, you moron.
That's called your stupid ******* opinion, dummy.
[/QUOTE
It's called a factual sequence of that you ignore because you hate Trump.
Take a piece of paper and draw a flow chart from every article you read and describe every box, including who said what to whom.
If that doesn't tell you what is fact and what is hate, that's your problem, not my problem.
You do it. It's your claim, and it has nothing to do with me, other than I think Trump is unfit for the office he holds. I don't hate him, although I certainly don't respect or admire him.
I do get tired of people trying to assign negative motivations to me and others. I didn't think you were lying when you said you didn't know any nurses who had died. I just thought that personal tidbit wasn't particularly relevant to the big picture. I do now think you're an irritating little dick.
What you post.
I am irritating to people who don't me pointing out their inability to communicate facts withing context.
That's why you consider me an irritating little dick.
I'm pleased that I show others with an IQ above 0 how you are persuaded by nonsense.
You think you've done that? Really? Well, no praise like self-praise, I suppose.
If you want to look back at who called who a moron first, help yourself. It may increase your self-awareness. Also, ascribing my motivations to hatred is a personal attack. If you want to swap insults, I can do that.
Perhaps I called you a moron because you're constantly following your emotions and never following facts.Ask
Ask yourself why you are spending time posting ad hominems and not analyzing the article.My impression of you comes in only one form...QUOTE="joaquinmiller, post: 24514453, member: 45560"]
Brietbart is a GW loving, neo-Con piece of shit.Yeah, because a reporter being called on the phone by some informer isn't anecdotal!
Nurses read names of colleagues who died of COVID-19 in protest outside White House
National Nurses United organized the protest to call attention to the thousands of health care workers who were infected by the coronavirus.www.usatoday.com
Why can't you look this up yourself?
And spoil anecdotal testimony? WTF!
Life being stranger than fiction, reporters actually do attempt to check facts, Brietbart notwithstanding, and they frequently offer anecdotes in the guise of, 'according to' or 'she said'. Anecdotes relay a narrative, not a fact.
You believe every report you get that "some unidentified person" working in an institution called "an honest and responsible person" to report to a Click Hungry media outlet that something happened that makes Trump evil.
That's called an anecdote, you moron.
That's called your stupid ******* opinion, dummy.
[/QUOTE
It's called a factual sequence of that you ignore because you hate Trump.
Take a piece of paper and draw a flow chart from every article you read and describe every box, including who said what to whom.
If that doesn't tell you what is fact and what is hate, that's your problem, not my problem.
You do it. It's your claim, and it has nothing to do with me, other than I think Trump is unfit for the office he holds. I don't hate him, although I certainly don't respect or admire him.
I do get tired of people trying to assign negative motivations to me and others. I didn't think you were lying when you said you didn't know any nurses who had died. I just thought that personal tidbit wasn't particularly relevant to the big picture. I do now think you're an irritating little dick.
What you post.
I am irritating to people who don't me pointing out their inability to communicate facts withing context.
That's why you consider me an irritating little dick.
I'm pleased that I show others with an IQ above 0 how you are persuaded by nonsense.
You think you've done that? Really? Well, no praise like self-praise, I suppose.
If you want to look back at who called who a moron first, help yourself. It may increase your self-awareness. Also, ascribing my motivations to hatred is a personal attack. If you want to swap insults, I can do that.
That's a attribute of a moron.
There is room for you to improve; you must be willing to leave the state of you being a moron behind.
And no, you can't swap insults with me because emotional people have a limited range of wit.
All I have to do to insult you is point out how you would fail the reading comprehension section of the SAT.
I should have started you with the process of analyzing an article...Perhaps I called you a moron because you're constantly following your emotions and never following facts.Ask
Ask yourself why you are spending time posting ad hominems and not analyzing the article.My impression of you comes in only one form...QUOTE="joaquinmiller, post: 24514453, member: 45560"]
Brietbart is a GW loving, neo-Con piece of shit.Yeah, because a reporter being called on the phone by some informer isn't anecdotal!
Nurses read names of colleagues who died of COVID-19 in protest outside White House
National Nurses United organized the protest to call attention to the thousands of health care workers who were infected by the coronavirus.www.usatoday.com
Why can't you look this up yourself?
And spoil anecdotal testimony? WTF!
Life being stranger than fiction, reporters actually do attempt to check facts, Brietbart notwithstanding, and they frequently offer anecdotes in the guise of, 'according to' or 'she said'. Anecdotes relay a narrative, not a fact.
You believe every report you get that "some unidentified person" working in an institution called "an honest and responsible person" to report to a Click Hungry media outlet that something happened that makes Trump evil.
That's called an anecdote, you moron.
That's called your stupid ******* opinion, dummy.
[/QUOTE
It's called a factual sequence of that you ignore because you hate Trump.
Take a piece of paper and draw a flow chart from every article you read and describe every box, including who said what to whom.
If that doesn't tell you what is fact and what is hate, that's your problem, not my problem.
You do it. It's your claim, and it has nothing to do with me, other than I think Trump is unfit for the office he holds. I don't hate him, although I certainly don't respect or admire him.
I do get tired of people trying to assign negative motivations to me and others. I didn't think you were lying when you said you didn't know any nurses who had died. I just thought that personal tidbit wasn't particularly relevant to the big picture. I do now think you're an irritating little dick.
What you post.
I am irritating to people who don't me pointing out their inability to communicate facts withing context.
That's why you consider me an irritating little dick.
I'm pleased that I show others with an IQ above 0 how you are persuaded by nonsense.
You think you've done that? Really? Well, no praise like self-praise, I suppose.
If you want to look back at who called who a moron first, help yourself. It may increase your self-awareness. Also, ascribing my motivations to hatred is a personal attack. If you want to swap insults, I can do that.
That's a attribute of a moron.
There is room for you to improve; you must be willing to leave the state of you being a moron behind.
And no, you can't swap insults with me because emotional people have a limited range of wit.
All I have to do to insult you is point out how you would fail the reading comprehension section of the SAT.
Perhaps you called me a moron because you're a moron. And perhaps you forgot you started the insults because you're a moron with a poor memory, or a moron lacking awareness. Perhaps you accuse me of 'hating' due to limited imagination or intelligence.
Reading comprehension? Yeah, go with that.
Is there a Yawn icon?Perhaps I called you a moron because you're constantly following your emotions and never following facts.Ask
Ask yourself why you are spending time posting ad hominems and not analyzing the article.My impression of you comes in only one form...QUOTE="joaquinmiller, post: 24514453, member: 45560"]
Brietbart is a GW loving, neo-Con piece of shit.Yeah, because a reporter being called on the phone by some informer isn't anecdotal!
Nurses read names of colleagues who died of COVID-19 in protest outside White House
National Nurses United organized the protest to call attention to the thousands of health care workers who were infected by the coronavirus.www.usatoday.com
Why can't you look this up yourself?
And spoil anecdotal testimony? WTF!
Life being stranger than fiction, reporters actually do attempt to check facts, Brietbart notwithstanding, and they frequently offer anecdotes in the guise of, 'according to' or 'she said'. Anecdotes relay a narrative, not a fact.
You believe every report you get that "some unidentified person" working in an institution called "an honest and responsible person" to report to a Click Hungry media outlet that something happened that makes Trump evil.
That's called an anecdote, you moron.
That's called your stupid ******* opinion, dummy.
[/QUOTE
It's called a factual sequence of that you ignore because you hate Trump.
Take a piece of paper and draw a flow chart from every article you read and describe every box, including who said what to whom.
If that doesn't tell you what is fact and what is hate, that's your problem, not my problem.
You do it. It's your claim, and it has nothing to do with me, other than I think Trump is unfit for the office he holds. I don't hate him, although I certainly don't respect or admire him.
I do get tired of people trying to assign negative motivations to me and others. I didn't think you were lying when you said you didn't know any nurses who had died. I just thought that personal tidbit wasn't particularly relevant to the big picture. I do now think you're an irritating little dick.
What you post.
I am irritating to people who don't me pointing out their inability to communicate facts withing context.
That's why you consider me an irritating little dick.
I'm pleased that I show others with an IQ above 0 how you are persuaded by nonsense.
You think you've done that? Really? Well, no praise like self-praise, I suppose.
If you want to look back at who called who a moron first, help yourself. It may increase your self-awareness. Also, ascribing my motivations to hatred is a personal attack. If you want to swap insults, I can do that.
That's a attribute of a moron.
There is room for you to improve; you must be willing to leave the state of you being a moron behind.
And no, you can't swap insults with me because emotional people have a limited range of wit.
All I have to do to insult you is point out how you would fail the reading comprehension section of the SAT.
Perhaps you called me a moron because you're a moron. And perhaps you forgot you started the insults because you're a moron with a poor memory, or a moron lacking awareness. Perhaps you accuse me of 'hating' due to limited imagination or intelligence.
Reading comprehension? Yeah, go with that.
i am laughing at you, son. a conspiracy theorist calling others sheep, another great joke to laugh at. well done.
California thinks that they can live without the USA, lol they can't keep the poop off the sidewalkCalifornia produces more human poop on the sidewalk than any other stateCalifornia is the pot capital of the universeHow do you explain the immense immunity in CaliforniaWhat happens is, someone dies of pneumonia. An autopsy is done and the pneumonia is tested to see which one it was (there are a bunch, some rare ones are extremely deadly). If coronavirus was in the US in November, we would have been the ones to discover it, not China. That doesn't mean that MILD cases weren't floating around here and there earlier than January, because if no one died the docs would never know. So you can assert that, but if it was true, why didn't the amount of cases start spreading alarmingly the way it did once we knew what it was?This means that the disease is not even new, the CDC needs to be fully defunded"An estimated 4.1 percent of adult residents in Los Angeles County have the antibody to the coronavirus, which indicates that hundreds of thousands of them may have been infected, according to preliminary results from a new study.
The collaborative study from USC and the county's department of public health suggests "infections from the new coronavirus are far more widespread than previously thought." The study indicates that approximately 221,000 to 442,000 adults in the county have had the infection at some point in time. The results also suggest that the mortality rate is much lower.
That figure is 28 to 55 times bigger than the 7,994 confirmed COVID-19 cases in the county at the time of the study in early April, according to the study. As of Monday, there are 13,816 positive cases in the region."
Coronavirus Study: 4.1% of LA County residents have antibody, suggesting higher infection rate than confirmed cases
Hundreds of thousands of residents in Los Angeles County may have been infected with coroanvirus, according to a new antibody study from USC.abc7news.com
Something short of 650 dead from the virus in LA County so far. Let's do some math...we'll go with the median of 350,000 infected.
That gives us ~.2% deaths?
What is the flu? .1%? .2%? normally?
Still gonna wear those masks shitheads?
Rarely do we see anyone smoking in public in CA. That and obesity seem to a condition of many who die from the disease. And if one is healthy, at any age, and does not smoke, is not fat, won't eat fast food and doesn't use salt to extremes have a good chance of having a strong immunity to all diseases.
What California are you in exactly
Californian is the Bread Basket of the US: "Crops include grapes, almonds, strawberries, oranges and walnuts. California produces almost all of the country's almonds, apricots, dates, figs, kiwi fruit, nectarines, olives, pistachios, prunes, and walnuts. It leads in the production of avocados, grapes, lemons, melons, peaches, plums, and strawberries."
Economy of California including California Agriculture and Manufacturing from NETSTATE.COM
Economy of California including California agriculture, manufacturing, mining, commercial fishing, and service industries.www.netstate.com
Let me know if you need photos
California's economy is now the 5th-biggest in the world, and has overtaken the United Kingdom
California's economy grew to $2.747 trillion in 2017, eclipsing the United Kingdom's $2.625 trillion figure and leaving it effectively sixth on the world stage, according to data from the US Department of Commerce.www.businessinsider.com
You can't make an omelet without taking a crap.
