More People from Fox News Admit there was no voter fraud !!!

[bigrebnc1775]

Ya mean like this?

There will be more than that. The photo is very vague. Doubt there is much grass around the Pentagon

 

[EMH]

Damn....you still telling that lie??? Precisely zero truth in your lil brain.

Fact check: Airplane debris was found at Pentagon on 9/11 and footage of attack was released

Airplane debris was found at the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001. The Pentagon released security camera footage of the attack in 2006.

news.yahoo.com

The claim: No plane debris was found at Pentagon, no CCTV footage of crash and trillions went missing from budget​

American Airlines Flight 77 was hijacked by al-Qaida militants and crashed into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001, killing all 64 people on the plane and 125 in the Pentagon. But more than 21 years later, some social media users are still questioning the details of the attack.
"Never forget no plane debris was found at the Pentagon. There is no CCTV footage and trillions went missing from the budget," reads a Sept. 10 Facebook post that was shared more than 200 times in less than a week.
But the claims are baseless.
Airplane debris was found at the Pentagon, as confirmed by images and videos from the scene and an array of eyewitness accounts. The Pentagon also released security camera footage from the attack in 2006, and there is no evidence trillions went missing from the Pentagon budget before or after the attack.
USA TODAY reached out to the social media users who shared the claim for comment.

Airplane debris was found at the Pentagon, CCTV footage was released​

The FBI published numerous photos that show airplane debris at the site of the attack, including a piece of damaged metal with text on it that says "American Airlines, Inc."
Jamie McIntyre, then a CNN reporter, was inside the Pentagon when the attack occurred and also captured images of debris, which he later shared in 2010 on his website "Line of Departure." He reported at the time that the Pentagon heliport was littered with "thousands of tiny shards of airplane wreckage" and what appeared to be part of a cockpit window.

That the Zionist Fascists plant evidence, doctor photos, and off observers is undeniable...

Where is the plane debris in Shanksville???

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Tucker also admitted that trump's election fraud claims were false.

There is no evidence the claim is false. All you have are judges without a backbone and willing to listen to eye witness accounts

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

There will be more than that. The photo is very vague. Doubt there is much grass around the Pentagon

 

[LA RAM FAN]

sure, troll.

what have you got?

ypou mean all the ovewheling facts that have been posted here the last two years of vote fraud in the conspiracy section that you America haters sun off from,THAT got stuff?

oh and your conspiracy theory of russis collusion which proves you are a lying troll who hates America,THAT got?LOL

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

 

[The5thHorseman]

ypou mean all the ovewheling facts that have been posted here the last two years of vote fraud in the conspiracy section that you America haters sun off from,THAT got stuff?

oh and your conspiracy theory of russis collusion which proves you are a lying troll who hates America,THAT got?LOL

All the bupkis?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Yea your other news sources are even more fake bullshit lies.

With the no credibility lying GOP its either it all boils down to fake news and lies.

Republicans can't even admit Trump lost the election and there was no fraud, which means they have zero credibility.

^ Very fake news

 

[theHawk]

Tucker also admitted that trump's election fraud claims were false.

Uh huh, sure.

 

[The Banker]

More court docs from the Dominion Super scandal Coming MONDAY !!!!!!

Get the popcorn ready, this will be good and it all builds to a devastating trial where so much evidence will come forward destroying Trump and Fake Fox news and all the dumb mothafuckers who watch that trash

 

[Lesh]

Uh huh, sure.

Dude… there are emails and texts.

It’s fact.

 

[Pellinore]

Well, ChatGPT has a leftist bend:

CF: where can I find relatively unbiased, unfiltered news and information

There are several ways to find relatively unbiased and unfiltered news and information:

1. Read from multiple sources: One of the best ways to avoid biased news is to read from multiple sources, including those that have different perspectives on the same issue. This will give you a more balanced view of the news and help you avoid falling into an echo chamber.
2. Check reputable news organizations: Reputable news organizations with a track record of accuracy and fact-checking are generally more trustworthy sources of information. Examples of such organizations include Reuters, BBC, NPR, and AP News.
3. Use fact-checking websites: Fact-checking websites like Snopes, FactCheck.org, and PolitiFact can help you verify the accuracy of a news story or claim. They often use objective criteria to assess the validity of statements and reports.
4. Avoid opinion-based programs: Avoid news programs that are opinion-based and instead opt for those that report the news in a factual and objective manner.
5. Stay informed about media bias: It's important to be aware of media bias and to understand how it can influence the way news is reported. Some organizations, such as AllSides and Media Bias Fact Check, provide ratings of media bias to help you navigate the news landscape.

Overall, consuming news from a variety of sources and fact-checking information is the best way to stay informed and avoid being influenced by biased or filtered information.

CF: But you recommended biased, leftist sources and fact checkers.

As an AI language model, I strive to provide neutral and impartial information to the best of my ability, and I do not have any political bias. In my previous response, I mentioned reputable news organizations with a track record of accuracy and fact-checking, such as Reuters, BBC, NPR, and AP News. These organizations are generally considered to be reliable sources of news and are not known for having a political bias.

Regarding fact-checking websites, I mentioned Snopes, FactCheck.org, and PolitiFact, which are widely regarded as nonpartisan and use objective criteria to assess the accuracy of claims and statements.

It's important to note that bias is inherent in any human interpretation of the news, including the selection of stories, language used, and tone. It's essential to be aware of this and consume news from a variety of sources to get a more balanced view of the issues.

The Chatbot here has it right: Those are the steps you should take to keep from being bamboozled.

Looking back at your posts, your only rebuttals appear to be along the lines of "Well, it's obvious," and that they must be lying because they contradict you.

Let's pretend for a moment that you are wrong, that these sites are not biased, they have been telling the truth all along, and the information you have been happily swallowing has been manipulative anti-truth designed to keep you placid and to support the rise to power of a small group of anti-democratic demagogues. Just pretend.

What would it take to convince you?

 

[Pellinore]

There will be more than that. The photo is very vague. Doubt there is much grass around the Pentagon

There is more than that much grass within the Pentagon.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

There is more than that much grass within the Pentagon.

View attachment 760804

And your point? Never said there wasn't any grass but from the bottom pic looks like more concrete and asphalt than grass. Now if you could produce the pic of the crash wreckage.

 

[miketx]

Russian collusion has been proven time and again. Only the morons believe it never happened.

Only thing proven time and time again is that you're a liar.

 

[miketx]

There is more than that much grass within the Pentagon.

View attachment 760804

Why do that call it the pentagon? That's dumm.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Russian collusion has been proven time and again. Only the morons believe it never happened.

It's your conspiracy theory

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The Chatbot here has it right: Those are the steps you should take to keep from being bamboozled.

Looking back at your posts, your only rebuttals appear to be along the lines of "Well, it's obvious," and that they must be lying because they contradict you.

Let's pretend for a moment that you are wrong, that these sites are not biased, they have been telling the truth all along, and the information you have been happily swallowing has been manipulative anti-truth designed to keep you placid and to support the rise to power of a small group of anti-democratic demagogues. Just pretend.

What would it take to convince you?

NPR and BBC are to the left of Mao, AP is between Mao and Stalin. How is that not a biased list?

 

[Pellinore]

NPR and BBC are to the left of Mao, AP is between Mao and Stalin. How is that not a biased list?

Your views are, to say the least, in the minority.

It's about perspective. When you've set up camp in the red team's end zone, the fifty yard line seems a long, long way away.

Most of the rational world, though, lives around the middle, and so can more easily see the difference between this 40 and that 20 and the real out-there fringes.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Your views are, to say the least, in the minority.

It's about perspective. When you've set up camp in the red team's end zone, the fifty yard line seems a long, long way away.

Most of the rational world, though, lives around the middle, and so can more easily see the difference between this 40 and that 20 and the real out-there fringes.

Are you saying that NPR is unbiased?