More Palin Hypocrisy: Tripp Has Government Provided Health Insurance

[chanel]

Maple may have hit the nail on the head. This is confidential info. I hope someone loses their job over this like that ***** who snooped on Joe the Plumber.

Gee - I remember just last week getting my head chopped off for suggesting that the names of welfare recipients be de-classified. Ah - the smell of hypocrisy.

I will say it one more time for thgse thatr still don't get it - KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS!

 

[CaféAuLait]

Maple may have hit the nail on the head. This is confidential info. I hope someone loses their job over this like that ***** who snooped on Joe the Plumber.

Gee - I remember just last week getting my head chopped off for suggesting that the names of welfare recipients be de-classified. Ah - the smell of hypocrisy.

I will say it one more time for thgse thatr still don't get it - KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS!

Not to mention Sarah gets the heat here and I wonder if Levi enrolled him in the program? How does anyone here know WHO enrolled him

In the papers linked to it is obvious that they are from his lawyer—as he is arguing against Levi paying for insurance since Tripp is enrolled. So how do we know if Sarah’s Adult daughter enrolled him or her ex ADULT boyfriend enrolled his son?

Sarah Palin's grandson gets state funded health care? How interesting - The Dish Rag - Zap2it

 

[Vanquish]

Can we cut through the crap, please?

Let's start with what we can absolutely agree on...or at least should be...

1. It's doubtful that we'll know who made the decision to put whom on state-funded heathcare.
2. state-funded healthcare is a form of socialism
3. state-funded healthcare is what Palin has argued vehemently and emotionally against
4. the kid is on state-funded healthcare

Are we all still in the car so far? Good.

Look, Sarah doesn't have custody of her grandchild so Bristol or her man made the decision. At best you could say that Sarah could have spoken to her daughter about the decision. If you're on the left, you can say Sarah failed to convince her own daughter. If you're on the right, you can say Sarah let her daughter make her own decision. But that's really about as far as you can get with any certainty.

I do think that if Sarah really held true to her beliefs that she would keep pleading with Bristol to change. Heck, even make a blog post about how you're trying to convince your daughter. Show that the issue touches her personally. Lots of political capital there.

But it's not the smoking gun of hypocrisy the "article" makes it sound like.

Now that we're done with that...let's get to this piece of spewage:

What is hypocritical about opposing a program but benefitting from it?

There's a simple answer to this...it's called "principles". If you really oppose something...and believe something is harmful...you don't say "my choice isn't going to make a difference, I might as well"...you dont take the tax credit, you dont take the socialized medicine, you dont have the abortion...

Either you believe that something is evil...or you don't.

 

[ItHappens]

Tribes are sovereign.

 

[VaYank5150]

Can we cut through the crap, please?

Let's start with what we can absolutely agree on...or at least should be...

1. It's doubtful that we'll know who made the decision to put whom on state-funded heathcare.
2. state-funded healthcare is a form of socialism
3. state-funded healthcare is what Palin has argued vehemently and emotionally against
4. the kid is on state-funded healthcare

Are we all still in the car so far? Good.

Look, Sarah doesn't have custody of her grandchild so Bristol or her man made the decision. At best you could say that Sarah could have spoken to her daughter about the decision. If you're on the left, you can say Sarah failed to convince her own daughter. If you're on the right, you can say Sarah let her daughter make her own decision. But that's really about as far as you can get with any certainty.

I do think that if Sarah really held true to her beliefs that she would keep pleading with Bristol to change. Heck, even make a blog post about how you're trying to convince your daughter. Show that the issue touches her personally. Lots of political capital there.

But it's not the smoking gun of hypocrisy the "article" makes it sound like.

Now that we're done with that...let's get to this piece of spewage:

What is hypocritical about opposing a program but benefitting from it?

There's a simple answer to this...it's called "principles". If you really oppose something...and believe something is harmful...you don't say "my choice isn't going to make a difference, I might as well"...you dont take the tax credit, you dont take the socialized medicine, you dont have the abortion...

Either you believe that something is evil...or you don't.

With all of the money Palin took from the Tea Baggers, why is her only Grandson on ANY form of government funded anything???