More Liberal tears. Banning assualt weapons & magazines doesn't lower homicide

[Flash]

I suspect the stupid Liberals will be crying themselves to sleep. Their precious oppressive gun laws that they want doesn't lower killings.

Study: ‘Assault Weapons’ and Magazine Bans Do Not Lower Homicide Rates

A study on state-level gun control laws in the U.S. shows that bans on “high-capacity” magazines and “assault weapons” do not lower homicide rates.


The study was headed by Boston University School of Public Health’s Michael Siegel and another listed study author was Harvard gun control advocate David Hemenway.


The study, The Impact of State Firearm Laws on Homicide and Suicide Deaths in the USA, 1991–2016: a Panel Study, isolated four states to study ten different types of gun control to see if certain gun controls were successful in reducing homicide and/or suicide rates. Via their research, they discovered that “high-capacity” magazine and “assault weapons” bans do not lower homicide rates.

 

[bodecea]

We don't care about mass shootings in this country.

 

[Flash]

We don't care about mass shootings in this country.

But you stupid Liberals sure as hell care about taking away our Constitutional rights, even when the studies prove that it doesn't do anything to curtail crime.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I suspect the stupid Liberals will be crying themselves to sleep. Their precious oppressive gun laws that they want doesn't lower killings.

Study: ‘Assault Weapons’ and Magazine Bans Do Not Lower Homicide Rates

A study on state-level gun control laws in the U.S. shows that bans on “high-capacity” magazines and “assault weapons” do not lower homicide rates.


The study was headed by Boston University School of Public Health’s Michael Siegel and another listed study author was Harvard gun control advocate David Hemenway.


The study, The Impact of State Firearm Laws on Homicide and Suicide Deaths in the USA, 1991–2016: a Panel Study, isolated four states to study ten different types of gun control to see if certain gun controls were successful in reducing homicide and/or suicide rates. Via their research, they discovered that “high-capacity” magazine and “assault weapons” bans do not lower homicide rates.

actually ,what they will do is use this study to push for more gun laws that cover a wider range of guns and "accessories" .

 

[Nosmo King]

We don't care about mass shootings in this country.

But you stupid Liberals sure as hell care about taking away our Constitutional rights, even when the studies prove that it doesn't do anything to curtail crime.

Taking assault weapons and high capacity magazines does not take away your right to bear arms.

You don't have the right to bear any and all arms, but you can still defend yourself, poke holes in targets and animals and have boyish dun with your beer buddies.

 

[Flash]

We don't care about mass shootings in this country.

But you stupid Liberals sure as hell care about taking away our Constitutional rights, even when the studies prove that it doesn't do anything to curtail crime.

Taking assault weapons and high capacity magazines does not take away your right to bear arms.

You don't have the right to bear any and all arms, but you can still defend yourself, poke holes in targets and animals and have boyish dun with your beer buddies.

You are confused Moon Bat.

A judge in California said just last week that banning high capacity is a violation of the Constitution.

Banning what the Constitution says can't be infringe is only not infringing in the world of Libtards.

What else you got?

 

[bodecea]

We don't care about mass shootings in this country.

But you stupid Liberals sure as hell care about taking away our Constitutional rights, even when the studies prove that it doesn't do anything to curtail crime.

I am pro-2nd Amendment. But this is another thing...we don't care about mass shootings in this country.

 

[Brain357]

That Vegas mass shooter sure would have had a lot of trouble firing so many rounds with small
magazines...

 

[Brain357]

We don't care about mass shootings in this country.

But you stupid Liberals sure as hell care about taking away our Constitutional rights, even when the studies prove that it doesn't do anything to curtail crime.

Taking assault weapons and high capacity magazines does not take away your right to bear arms.

You don't have the right to bear any and all arms, but you can still defend yourself, poke holes in targets and animals and have boyish dun with your beer buddies.

You are confused Moon Bat.

A judge in California said just last week that banning high capacity is a violation of the Constitution.

Banning what the Constitution says can't be infringe is only not infringing in the world of Libtards.

What else you got?

And the Supreme Court has disagreed.

 

[Lesh]

The point of banning assault weapons is to deal with MASS SHOOTINGS.
'
And we had a ten year ban and it did just that

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

We don't care about mass shootings in this country.

But you stupid Liberals sure as hell care about taking away our Constitutional rights, even when the studies prove that it doesn't do anything to curtail crime.

Wrong.

It's conservatives who are stupid; the Supreme Court has never ruled on the constitutionally of such bans - no rights are being "taken away."

 

[Flash]

We don't care about mass shootings in this country.

But you stupid Liberals sure as hell care about taking away our Constitutional rights, even when the studies prove that it doesn't do anything to curtail crime.

I am pro-2nd Amendment. But this is another thing...we don't care about mass shootings in this country.

We care about them but not enough to curtail the Constitutional rights of 330,000,000 Americans.

Not when "mass shootings" have a relatively very small percentage of the crimes committed.

The great majority of gun crimes in this country are committed by druggies, gang bangers and street thugs mostly located in the Democrat voting big city shitholes.

Banning a rural Georgia farm family or somebody living in the suburbs of Tampa from having high capacity magazines or an AR 15 will do nothing to stop the vast majority of gun crimes in this country.

 

[Brain357]

The point of banning assault weapons is to deal with MASS SHOOTINGS.
'
And we had a ten year ban and it did just that

The number killed sure has increased in recent years. Each new worst mass killing is with rifles with high capacity magazines.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

We don't care about mass shootings in this country.

But you stupid Liberals sure as hell care about taking away our Constitutional rights, even when the studies prove that it doesn't do anything to curtail crime.

Taking assault weapons and high capacity magazines does not take away your right to bear arms.

You don't have the right to bear any and all arms, but you can still defend yourself, poke holes in targets and animals and have boyish dun with your beer buddies.

You are confused Moon Bat.

A judge in California said just last week that banning high capacity is a violation of the Constitution.

Banning what the Constitution says can't be infringe is only not infringing in the world of Libtards.

What else you got?

One judge, not the Supreme Court, a ruling subject to appeal, having nothing to do with an AWB.

Conservatives are as ignorant as they are stupid.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

We don't care about mass shootings in this country.

The number of people who die in mass shootings in this country is less than 100th of 1 percent and the vast majority of gun violence is committed with simple handguns and in heavily urban areas. Most people aren't committing suicide or murdering their spouse with an AR. The ban on "assault" weapons is based purely on emotion, ignorance, and Straw Man arguments like yours.

 

[Brain357]

We don't care about mass shootings in this country.

But you stupid Liberals sure as hell care about taking away our Constitutional rights, even when the studies prove that it doesn't do anything to curtail crime.

I am pro-2nd Amendment. But this is another thing...we don't care about mass shootings in this country.

We care about them but not enough to curtail the Constitutional rights of 330,000,000 Americans.

Not when "mass shootings" have a relatively very small percentage of the crimes committed.

The great majority of gun crimes in this country are committed by druggies, gang bangers and street thugs mostly located in the Democrat voting big city shitholes.

Banning a rural Georgia farm family or somebody living in the suburbs of Tampa from having high capacity magazines or an AR 15 will do nothing to stop the vast majority of gun crimes in this country.

Having high capacity magazines only benefits mass killers.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

The point of banning assault weapons is to deal with MASS SHOOTINGS.
'
And we had a ten year ban and it did just that

The number killed sure has increased in recent years. Each new worst mass killing is with rifles with high capacity magazines.

And still not nearly as large as the worst mass shootings in Europe where they've had all of this stuff banned for decades

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

That Vegas mass shooter sure would have had a lot of trouble firing so many rounds with small
magazines...

And how many times has there been a Vegas mass shooter? Once in 240 years.

I guess we should ban all air travel since one time in American history four planes killed 3,000 of us in one day.

 

[Yarddog]

We don't care about mass shootings in this country.

But you stupid Liberals sure as hell care about taking away our Constitutional rights, even when the studies prove that it doesn't do anything to curtail crime.

I am pro-2nd Amendment. But this is another thing...we don't care about mass shootings in this country.

What we really don't care about is the reasons why more people are commiting suicide, the root causes and what might be done to address that. Suicides still represent the largest portion of gun deaths, yet when talking about guns it never comes up, only assault weapons and the NRA etc. even though the vast vast majority of Americans who own guns will never commit a gun crime.

 

[Brain357]

The point of banning assault weapons is to deal with MASS SHOOTINGS.
'
And we had a ten year ban and it did just that

The number killed sure has increased in recent years. Each new worst mass killing is with rifles with high capacity magazines.

And still not nearly as large as the worst mass shootings in Europe where they've had all of this stuff banned for decades

Countries with strong gun control rarely have mass shootings. When was the last mass shooting in the UK?