Ok, show me where the article I posted is speaking of this specific study...
Here is the link again just to make it super easy for you to highlight....
Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract
Your article from December, 2016 cites a new study
"by economists Lawrence Katz of Harvard University and Alan Krueger at Princeton University..." [falsely] claiming the study states
"nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract."
I posted a link to the actual study, you ******* retard, from September, 2016,
"by Lawrence F. Katz Harvard University and NBER and Alan B. Krueger Princeton University and NBER...." showing they actually said that
nearly 95% of all new jobs that were part-time, or contract, were actually during the years, 2005-2015.
Now stop lying.
I think you are thinking that the study you found was the one in the article...But, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt since the article doesn't link to the study....
That being said, I think it is significant that your study which spans 3 presidents, Clinton, Bush, and Obama, the trend of counting non traditional jobs as jobs that impact the reports, even when these jobs are temp at best is just proof for my argument that the stats are skewed....
LOL
Shit, don't give me the benefit of the doubt. Post a link to
another study in late 2016 by Lawrence F. Katz of Harvard University and Alan B. Krueger of Princeton University stating what you claimed.
And the stats were not skewed. They were never meant to be applied to presidents.
See, now you can go **** yourself...If you in front of me in person, I'd have slapped you by now....You're not here for serious discussion...I already conceded that the article I cited was likely using the study you dug up, what the **** more do you want you asshole....And the fact that you say they were never meant to be applied to Presidents, then what the **** are you arguing about then in terms of Trump? You dipshit! You're just so damned partisan that having a conversation with you is like driving needles into my eyes....In fact I am surprised you can feed yourself you drooling shitbag...Now go off and die somewhere painfully.
Dumbfuck,
that study was never meant to be applied to presidents. I never said anything else was not.
And you're concession was bullshit. You
give me the benefit if doubt. I told you, I don't want that from you. I want you to post the actual article if you think there's a chance that's not it.
You can't because, as the forum sees, you blindly accepted that fake news article as fact for no reason other than you liked what it said; and there is no other article other than the one I posted.
Now you're swinging your purse at me because I proved you posted 100% unadulterated bullshit.