Manonthestreet
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2014
- 34,777
- 23,097
- 1,945
It also attacks the very way in which food and things are distributed. It attacks the idea of property, and it attacks the idea that in order for someone to have a roof over their head or have a meal ticket, they have to work for a boss, in order to buy things that people just like them somewhere else in the world had to make under the same conditions. It points to the way in which that's unjust. And the reason that the world is organized that way, obviously, is for the profit of the people who own the stores and the factories. So you get to the heart of that property relation, and demonstrate that without police and without state oppression, we can have things for free. One Author's Argument 'In Defense Of Looting'
PErson actually thinks "free" stuff will continue to show up to be looted. Not once does reality intrude into their thinking. Why do we pay for crap like this to be sold to idiot public school do nothings
PErson actually thinks "free" stuff will continue to show up to be looted. Not once does reality intrude into their thinking. Why do we pay for crap like this to be sold to idiot public school do nothings