Scrubbing technology costs next to nothing.It costs money and down time. But the end result is a reliable power source, unlike wind and solar.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Scrubbing technology costs next to nothing.It costs money and down time. But the end result is a reliable power source, unlike wind and solar.
On what do you base that?Scrubbing technology costs next to nothing.
That the sun goes down does not impact the reliability of a solar panel any more than does the performance of a fossil fuel power plant that has no fuel. When the sun rises and when the coal or gas gets delivered, they both resume work with no repairs required.
As much as your battery will hold.When you're looking to supply a modern economy with 24 hours of power a day, solar really
doesn't make the cut.
And with a coal plant, you can store months of fuel, right outside the plant.
How much solar can your panel store nearby?
As much as your battery will hold.
As many as it takes. And, of course, the wind blows at night and a good chunk of northern Indiana is covered with massive wind turbines all for that particular city. And then there'll be various ways to use hydrogen and eventually fusion reactors and will be well, all will be well, all manner of things will be well.How many hours of storage do we need to build to power Chicago for a dark, cold, snowy February?
To backup your reliable solar panels.
As many as it takes. And, of course, the wind blows at night and a good chunk of northern Indiana is covered with massive wind turbines all for that particular city. And then there'll be various ways to use hydrogen and eventually fusion reactors and will be well, all will be well, all manner of things will be well.
Then... you already knew the answer to your question? I think more and more each day that the answer for tranportation and no sun, no wind times is green hydrogen produced with non-emitting powerAs many as it takes?
Sounds like an incredibly expensive way to cover the shortfalls of unreliable wind and solar.
Hydrogen is not a source of energy? Do tell.And then there'll be various ways to use hydrogen
Another expensive waste of time. Not a source of energy, a non-solution looking for a problem.
Then... you already knew the answer to your question? I think more and more each day that the answer for tranportation and no sun, no wind times is green hydrogen produced with non-emitting power
Hydrogen is not a source of energy? Do tell.
Electrolyzed from water with electricity generated by wind, solar panels or fusionHydrogen is not a source of energy? Do tell.
Coal is a source of energy. You dig it out of the ground and you burn it.
Oil and natural gas come out of the ground.....loaded with energy.
Where are you getting the green hydrogen?
Electrolyzed from water with electricity generated by wind, solar panels or fusion
Is anyone doing this commercially now?Electrolyzed from water with electricity generated by wind, solar panels or fusion
Yep. Now you hit me up over the poor efficiency and I come back and talk about zero fuel costs.So the wind or solar energy is stored in hydrogen.
Yep. Now you hit me up over the poor efficiency and I come back and talk about zero fuel costs.
You know it.Of course I will.
And you'll point to Germany's highest in the world electricity costs
as proof that solar and wind "free fuel" means that they're cheaper.
You know it.
Back in mid-2014 German energy prices began to move down or at least stabilize but that trend died aborning with the war.
The cost of socialization. And take note that the people there aren't complaining. The populations of virtually every (perhaps just "every") democratic socialist state on the planet are measurably happier with their governments than Americans are with theirs.Before the war, their prices were triple our prices.
Why so expensive with all that "free fuel"?
The cost of socialization. And take note that the people there aren't complaining. The populations of virtually every (perhaps just "every") democratic socialist state on the planet are measurably happier with their governments than Americans are with theirs.
Another thread by a climate change denialist trolling for attention.
The science is settled! Nuff said!
What Big Oil knew about climate change, in its own words
Transcripts and internal documents show how the industry shifted from leading research into fossil fuels’ effect on the climate to sowing doubt about science.theconversation.com
Even the bad guys are starting to accept responsibility for being the bad guys now!
Surprising discoveries
At an old gunpowder factory in Delaware – now a museum and archive – I found a transcript of a petroleum conference from 1959 called the “Energy and Man” symposium, held at Columbia University in New York. As I flipped through, I saw a speech from a famous scientist, Edward Teller (who helped invent the hydrogen bomb), warning the industry executives and others assembled of global warming.
“Whenever you burn conventional fuel,” Teller explained, “you create carbon dioxide. … Its presence in the atmosphere causes a greenhouse effect.” If the world kept using fossil fuels, the ice caps would begin to melt, raising sea levels. Eventually, “all the coastal cities would be covered,” he warned.