MLB Players Forced to Endorse Homosexuality

Sports and religion are two areas of society in which politics should have no place.

Shame on the MLB.
Where are the politics? Things aren't "political", just because we dont like them. They aren't advocating for a candidate or legislation or policy.

The problem here is that EVERYTHING is "political", to the right. Because they try to make it so.
 
Log Cabin Republicans, the oldest and largest United States organization representing LGBTQ+ conservatives and their allies. [1]
Key details about the organization include:
  • Mission: They advocate for a more inclusive Republican Party based on traditional conservative principles like limited government, lower taxes, and individual freedom. [1, 2]
  • Key Issues: They actively lobby on policy issues central to the queer community, including tax equity for same-sex spouses, religious freedom, and modernizing blood donation rules. [1, 2]
  • National Presence: The group has members across all 50 states and maintains an active chapter network as well as a federal Political Action Committee (PAC). [1, 2]

The Log Cabin Republicans are probably more just LGB than LGBTQ+AIQWERTYUIOPaddyourlettershere

They are the normies.
 
Forcing someone to do something like this is counterproductive. It’s like the people who think those who make money should be taxed to the hilt. These taxed people then become disillusioned when they see where their taxes are going. You stifle giving when you do that. The US consistently ranks at the top in charitable giving. Year after year.
 
Being gay is not a political choice; it is a lifestyle.
Never said otherwise, you claimed that all businesses forced their politics on their workers, I am saying they don’t as did several others. Like I said I don’t give a damn about your politics, your religion, your sexual preferences, none of it matters, just do what the hell I hired you for and I am good, so all your blather is BS because you are the one that made a stupid claim that you can’t back up and are to proud to admit you are wrong so you try to change the narrative.
 
Forcing someone to do something like this is counterproductive. It’s like the people who think those who make money should be taxed to the hilt. These taxed people then become disillusioned when they see where their taxes are going. You stifle giving when you do that. The US consistently ranks at the top in charitable giving. Year after year.
And year after year proves that private charities do not and will never meet the needs. That debate ended almost 100 years ago.
 
Never said otherwise, you claimed that all businesses forced their politics on their workers, I am saying they don’t as did several others. Like I said I don’t give a damn about your politics, your religion, your sexual preferences, none of it matters, just do what the hell I hired you for and I am good, so all your blather is BS because you are the one that made a stupid claim that you can’t back up and are to proud to admit you are wrong so you try to change the narrative.
Being gay is not political, but you keep claiming it is.
 
I wouldn’t know, all I am asserting is, if their contract with the union or MLB says they have to wear, then they have to wear it. If it doesn’t then they should be made to wear it.
Islam being excused would be because of politics but contracts can’t legally violate conscientious objection on religious grounds.
That’s why people must remove hats in court rooms but not Hindus or Muslims or Jews, etc.
 
Where are the politics? Things aren't "political", just because we dont like them. They aren't advocating for a candidate or legislation or policy.

The problem here is that EVERYTHING is "political", to the right. Because they try to make it so.
It’s a partisan activity and, hence, political.
 
Being gay is not political, but you keep claiming it is.
I never said it was political, show me where I said that, you claimed businesses forced their politics their politics on their workers, they do not, so back your claim or STFU!

I don’t give a damn if anyone is gay, don’t care.
 
15th post
Islam being excused would be because of politics but contracts can’t legally violate conscientious objection on religious grounds.
That’s why people must remove hats in court rooms but not Hindus or Muslims or Jews, etc.
Again, prove it. You are making an assumption based on your views. If it did happen it would be wrong.
 
And year after year proves that private charities do not and will never meet the needs. That debate ended almost 100 years ago.
What needs? You mean the 2.6 million DC spent to get Chinese prostitutes to drink more responsibly on the job? Or the 3 billion DC spent to resand beaches? Ya know, that grainy stuff that goes back in the ocean?
 
Back
Top Bottom