Mitt Romney will be elected president in 2012 easily

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hillary says NO right now because it is prudent to do so.

Independents will NOT go for Palin or any other GOP nominee. The Dems could run a can of corned beef hash in 2012, and still win.

Oh wait, the Dems ran one in 2008, and won. Case proven.

Polls? Whatever for?

Polls? Some actual data instead of leftist/socialist fantasies. You need to have some factoid, or your opinion is just a fantasy. Yea, I know it worked in 2008, but the voters are smarter in 2012.
Polls taken today or recently don't reflect what will happen in November 2012. They reflect what might happen TODAY, therefore are completely useless when talking 2012.

Psst: You really look like a moron trying to paint me as a leftist/socialist. You need to check YOUR facts on that.

Again, Independent voters will NEVER go for Palin. And without us, she has zero chance at all. No poll needed there, it's just a fact. She has no appeal outside of the fundie zealot partisans of the far right. And there's not enough of those to win in the general.

There's a LONG list of people I would vote for over Palin. A really long one. And I'm far from alone in that.

Gotta agree. Politically? 2012 might as well be a millenium away. Too many variables.
 
All over except the shouting.

Got the Morman Issue over in the 2008 campaign.

Forget about Sarah Palin - although she might be a good VP choice.

Romney has been my choice since 2008 so I hope you are correct however I would rather see Marco Rubio as VP, rather than Palin.
 
I think with Obama, my biggest concern is with Pelosi in a leadership position and these tax cuts. Progressives are pissed that Obama is considering compromising the Bush tax cuts for the top 2% for 2 years. Why? So Republicans can campaign we will bring them back with our president in? C'mon man, show some backbone.

1. Pelosi needs to resign her leadership position.

2. Make Republicans vote against Middle class tax cuts. Dare them. Show some toughness.
 
I think with Obama, my biggest concern is with Pelosi in a leadership position and these tax cuts. Progressives are pissed that Obama is considering compromising the Bush tax cuts for the top 2% for 2 years. Why? So Republicans can campaign we will bring them back with our president in? C'mon man, show some backbone.

1. Pelosi needs to resign her leadership position.

2. Make Republicans vote against Middle class tax cuts. Dare them. Show some toughness.

And make the Statists in Congress defend their class warfare agenda.

Tax cuts for ALL...or nothing.
 
All over except the shouting.

Got the Morman Issue over in the 2008 campaign.

Forget about Sarah Palin - although she might be a good VP choice.

Palin?

She's the one who sunk McCains chances.

I hope nobody's stupid enough to pick that psycho again.
 
All over except the shouting.

Got the Morman Issue over in the 2008 campaign.

Forget about Sarah Palin - although she might be a good VP choice.

Palin?

She's the one who sunk McCains chances.

I hope nobody's stupid enough to pick that psycho again.

McCain had no chance... Palin sux but she is 1,000x btter than the politician who helped set the standered for selling out.
 
I think with Obama, my biggest concern is with Pelosi in a leadership position and these tax cuts. Progressives are pissed that Obama is considering compromising the Bush tax cuts for the top 2% for 2 years. Why? So Republicans can campaign we will bring them back with our president in? C'mon man, show some backbone.

1. Pelosi needs to resign her leadership position.

2. Make Republicans vote against Middle class tax cuts. Dare them. Show some toughness.
You're calling for a continuation of Pelosi's divisive strategies while at the same time wishing for her to relinquish leadership.

Irony much?

And you wonder why the Dems got mashed this November?

No, the answer is, extend ALL of the 2003 tax cuts for at least a couple of years, stop claiming they are "for the rich" when they're really for everyone, and move the fuck on. This is the problem with the Dems under Pelosi, they don't know how to pick their battles. And they think ALL of the people are as stupid as the ones who keep voting them in.
 
I think with Obama, my biggest concern is with Pelosi in a leadership position and these tax cuts. Progressives are pissed that Obama is considering compromising the Bush tax cuts for the top 2% for 2 years. Why? So Republicans can campaign we will bring them back with our president in? C'mon man, show some backbone.

1. Pelosi needs to resign her leadership position.

2. Make Republicans vote against Middle class tax cuts. Dare them. Show some toughness.
You're calling for a continuation of Pelosi's divisive strategies while at the same time wishing for her to relinquish leadership.

Irony much?

And you wonder why the Dems got mashed this November?

No, the answer is, extend ALL of the 2003 tax cuts for at least a couple of years, stop claiming they are "for the rich" when they're really for everyone, and move the fuck on. This is the problem with the Dems under Pelosi, they don't know how to pick their battles. And they think ALL of the people are as stupid as the ones who keep voting them in.


Well stated.
 
All over except the shouting.

Got the Morman Issue over in the 2008 campaign.

Forget about Sarah Palin - although she might be a good VP choice.

Palin?

She's the one who sunk McCains chances.

I hope nobody's stupid enough to pick that psycho again.

I disagree, Palin was the only reason Obama beat McCain instead of Obama beating McCain because 20% of the Republican voters broke off to a third party.
 
All over except the shouting.

Got the Morman Issue over in the 2008 campaign.

Forget about Sarah Palin - although she might be a good VP choice.

Palin?

She's the one who sunk McCains chances.

I hope nobody's stupid enough to pick that psycho again.

I disagree, Palin was the only reason Obama beat McCain instead of Obama beating McCain because 20% of the Republican voters broke off to a third party.
They had already broken off, this is why McSame brought Palin in -- trying to get them back.

McSame's campaign was one of the worst run campaigns ever. Ever.
 
He's got a shot.

But not with Palin as VP.

Palin would be an asset to anyone who wants to add the voice of true Americans to the ticket.

And, that's what the Obamarrhoidal LIEbturds fear most.
The above bolded part? Can be done without all of the negative baggage and divisiveness, and polarization Palin would bring. Palin does not have a monopoly on the "voice of true Americans" bit.

Please start thinking.
 
Palin?

She's the one who sunk McCains chances.

I hope nobody's stupid enough to pick that psycho again.

I disagree, Palin was the only reason Obama beat McCain instead of Obama beating McCain because 20% of the Republican voters broke off to a third party.
They had already broken off, this is why McSame brought Palin in -- trying to get them back.

McSame's campaign was one of the worst run campaigns ever. Ever.

It wasn't even a half-hearted college try.
 
I disagree, Palin was the only reason Obama beat McCain instead of Obama beating McCain because 20% of the Republican voters broke off to a third party.
They had already broken off, this is why McSame brought Palin in -- trying to get them back.

McSame's campaign was one of the worst run campaigns ever. Ever.

It wasn't even a half-hearted college try.
Yeah, it was "I won't go negative. I'll wait until he's inaugurated, then go negative all day from the peanut gallery!"
 
They had already broken off, this is why McSame brought Palin in -- trying to get them back.

McSame's campaign was one of the worst run campaigns ever. Ever.

It wasn't even a half-hearted college try.
Yeah, it was "I won't go negative. I'll wait until he's inaugurated, then go negative all day from the peanut gallery!"

And that was Juan mcCain's problem. But he had a history of being wobbly with the other side...McCain Feingold comes to mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top