What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Minnesota now violating the 1st Amendment.

pknopp

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
30,002
Reaction score
7,950
Points
1,090
There is really something wrong in Minnesota.

Journalists covering a protest in a Minneapolis suburb Friday night were forced on their stomachs by law enforcement, rounded up and were only released after having their face and press credentials photographed.

Police in Minnesota round up journalists covering protest, force them on the ground and take pictures of their faces

Now they are attacking journalists. I understand that they do not like this much coverage but sooner or later they are going to have to realize that people are no longer simply going to accept them violating people's rights.
 

harmonica

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
38,237
Reaction score
14,363
Points
1,560
There is really something wrong in Minnesota.

Journalists covering a protest in a Minneapolis suburb Friday night were forced on their stomachs by law enforcement, rounded up and were only released after having their face and press credentials photographed.

Police in Minnesota round up journalists covering protest, force them on the ground and take pictures of their faces

Now they are attacking journalists. I understand that they do not like this much coverage but sooner or later they are going to have to realize that people are no longer simply going to accept them violating people's rights.
total bullshit from you--just your HATEFUL opinion
..cops do not violate people's rights--they try to arrest jackass RESISTING, dumbass VIOLENT criminals
 

fncceo

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
29,185
Reaction score
15,312
Points
1,415
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.
 

petro

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
9,544
Reaction score
7,727
Points
2,055
Location
The cold north
The media hasn't shut up here in MN about the entire ordeal putting their leftist spin on shit.
They are still reporting this morning, so the OP is completely false.
Yet protesters clobbered a CNN staffer with a water bottle. Seems the protesters have a problem with the First Amendment.
 
OP
pknopp

pknopp

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
30,002
Reaction score
7,950
Points
1,090
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
 

harmonica

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
38,237
Reaction score
14,363
Points
1,560
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.
don't confuse them with facts
 

Oddball

Unobtanium Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
71,609
Reaction score
38,310
Points
2,615
Location
Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
It's a way of finding out whether or not they've been infiltrated by agitators, fool.
 

fncceo

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
29,185
Reaction score
15,312
Points
1,415
Photographing them is a form of intimidation.

maxresdefault.jpg


Every person who lives in a medium to large size town is photographed every time they board public transport every time they enter a store, every time they catch a cab, every time they use an ATM, every time they drive their car down a highway... if that intimidates you, you need to stay under your bed.
 
Last edited:
OP
pknopp

pknopp

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
30,002
Reaction score
7,950
Points
1,090
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
It's a way of finding out whether or not they've been infiltrated by agitators, fool.

They can ask for credentials without holding them down and photographing them. All the same, I do NOT have to have credentials to report on their activities.
 

Oddball

Unobtanium Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
71,609
Reaction score
38,310
Points
2,615
Location
Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
It's a way of finding out whether or not they've been infiltrated by agitators, fool.

They can ask for credentials without holding them down and photographing them. All the same, I do NOT have to have credentials to report on their activities.
This ain't a tea party, numbnutz.
 
OP
pknopp

pknopp

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
30,002
Reaction score
7,950
Points
1,090
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
It's a way of finding out whether or not they've been infiltrated by agitators, fool.

They can ask for credentials without holding them down and photographing them. All the same, I do NOT have to have credentials to report on their activities.
This ain't a tea party, numbnutz.

Nor does it matter. The courts have consistently ruled that individuals can record the actions of the police.
 

Moonglow

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
162,392
Reaction score
24,275
Points
2,220
Location
sw mizzouri
There is really something wrong in Minnesota.

Journalists covering a protest in a Minneapolis suburb Friday night were forced on their stomachs by law enforcement, rounded up and were only released after having their face and press credentials photographed.

Police in Minnesota round up journalists covering protest, force them on the ground and take pictures of their faces

Now they are attacking journalists. I understand that they do not like this much coverage but sooner or later they are going to have to realize that people are no longer simply going to accept them violating people's rights.
The police state at work.
 

harmonica

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
38,237
Reaction score
14,363
Points
1,560
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
It's a way of finding out whether or not they've been infiltrated by agitators, fool.

They can ask for credentials without holding them down and photographing them. All the same, I do NOT have to have credentials to report on their activities.
you hate law and order and LOVE criminals
 

harmonica

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
38,237
Reaction score
14,363
Points
1,560
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
It's a way of finding out whether or not they've been infiltrated by agitators, fool.

They can ask for credentials without holding them down and photographing them. All the same, I do NOT have to have credentials to report on their activities.
This ain't a tea party, numbnutz.

Nor does it matter. The courts have consistently ruled that individuals can record the actions of the police.
wrong--not if they interfere/etc
 
OP
pknopp

pknopp

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
30,002
Reaction score
7,950
Points
1,090
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
It's a way of finding out whether or not they've been infiltrated by agitators, fool.

They can ask for credentials without holding them down and photographing them. All the same, I do NOT have to have credentials to report on their activities.
This ain't a tea party, numbnutz.

Nor does it matter. The courts have consistently ruled that individuals can record the actions of the police.
wrong--not if they interfere/etc

If you can show where anyone was interfering you might have a point.
 

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
120,587
Reaction score
35,489
Points
2,220
There is really something wrong in Minnesota.

Journalists covering a protest in a Minneapolis suburb Friday night were forced on their stomachs by law enforcement, rounded up and were only released after having their face and press credentials photographed.

Police in Minnesota round up journalists covering protest, force them on the ground and take pictures of their faces

Now they are attacking journalists. I understand that they do not like this much coverage but sooner or later they are going to have to realize that people are no longer simply going to accept them violating people's rights.

Obama spied on Journalists, democrats support an out of control pedo Intel establishment...why is this a "Surprise"?
 

harmonica

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
38,237
Reaction score
14,363
Points
1,560
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
It's a way of finding out whether or not they've been infiltrated by agitators, fool.

They can ask for credentials without holding them down and photographing them. All the same, I do NOT have to have credentials to report on their activities.
This ain't a tea party, numbnutz.

Nor does it matter. The courts have consistently ruled that individuals can record the actions of the police.
wrong--not if they interfere/etc

If you can show where anyone was interfering you might have a point.
hhahahahah---you just proved my point--you can't refute it
 
OP
pknopp

pknopp

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
30,002
Reaction score
7,950
Points
1,090
There is really something wrong in Minnesota.

Journalists covering a protest in a Minneapolis suburb Friday night were forced on their stomachs by law enforcement, rounded up and were only released after having their face and press credentials photographed.

Police in Minnesota round up journalists covering protest, force them on the ground and take pictures of their faces

Now they are attacking journalists. I understand that they do not like this much coverage but sooner or later they are going to have to realize that people are no longer simply going to accept them violating people's rights.

Obama spied on Journalists, democrats support an out of control pedo Intel establishment...why is this a "Surprise"?

He did and none of this is OK.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$350.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top