Minnesota now violating the 1st Amendment.

pknopp

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2019
68,573
26,149
2,210
There is really something wrong in Minnesota.

Journalists covering a protest in a Minneapolis suburb Friday night were forced on their stomachs by law enforcement, rounded up and were only released after having their face and press credentials photographed.

Police in Minnesota round up journalists covering protest, force them on the ground and take pictures of their faces

Now they are attacking journalists. I understand that they do not like this much coverage but sooner or later they are going to have to realize that people are no longer simply going to accept them violating people's rights.
 
There is really something wrong in Minnesota.

Journalists covering a protest in a Minneapolis suburb Friday night were forced on their stomachs by law enforcement, rounded up and were only released after having their face and press credentials photographed.

Police in Minnesota round up journalists covering protest, force them on the ground and take pictures of their faces

Now they are attacking journalists. I understand that they do not like this much coverage but sooner or later they are going to have to realize that people are no longer simply going to accept them violating people's rights.
total bullshit from you--just your HATEFUL opinion
..cops do not violate people's rights--they try to arrest jackass RESISTING, dumbass VIOLENT criminals
 
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.
 
The media hasn't shut up here in MN about the entire ordeal putting their leftist spin on shit.
They are still reporting this morning, so the OP is completely false.
Yet protesters clobbered a CNN staffer with a water bottle. Seems the protesters have a problem with the First Amendment.
 
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
 
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.
don't confuse them with facts
 
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
It's a way of finding out whether or not they've been infiltrated by agitators, fool.
 
Photographing them is a form of intimidation.

maxresdefault.jpg


Every person who lives in a medium to large size town is photographed every time they board public transport every time they enter a store, every time they catch a cab, every time they use an ATM, every time they drive their car down a highway... if that intimidates you, you need to stay under your bed.
 
Last edited:
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
It's a way of finding out whether or not they've been infiltrated by agitators, fool.

They can ask for credentials without holding them down and photographing them. All the same, I do NOT have to have credentials to report on their activities.
 
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
It's a way of finding out whether or not they've been infiltrated by agitators, fool.

They can ask for credentials without holding them down and photographing them. All the same, I do NOT have to have credentials to report on their activities.
This ain't a tea party, numbnutz.
 
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
It's a way of finding out whether or not they've been infiltrated by agitators, fool.

They can ask for credentials without holding them down and photographing them. All the same, I do NOT have to have credentials to report on their activities.
This ain't a tea party, numbnutz.

Nor does it matter. The courts have consistently ruled that individuals can record the actions of the police.
 
There is really something wrong in Minnesota.

Journalists covering a protest in a Minneapolis suburb Friday night were forced on their stomachs by law enforcement, rounded up and were only released after having their face and press credentials photographed.

Police in Minnesota round up journalists covering protest, force them on the ground and take pictures of their faces

Now they are attacking journalists. I understand that they do not like this much coverage but sooner or later they are going to have to realize that people are no longer simply going to accept them violating people's rights.
The police state at work.
 
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
It's a way of finding out whether or not they've been infiltrated by agitators, fool.

They can ask for credentials without holding them down and photographing them. All the same, I do NOT have to have credentials to report on their activities.
you hate law and order and LOVE criminals
 
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
It's a way of finding out whether or not they've been infiltrated by agitators, fool.

They can ask for credentials without holding them down and photographing them. All the same, I do NOT have to have credentials to report on their activities.
This ain't a tea party, numbnutz.

Nor does it matter. The courts have consistently ruled that individuals can record the actions of the police.
wrong--not if they interfere/etc
 
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
It's a way of finding out whether or not they've been infiltrated by agitators, fool.

They can ask for credentials without holding them down and photographing them. All the same, I do NOT have to have credentials to report on their activities.
This ain't a tea party, numbnutz.

Nor does it matter. The courts have consistently ruled that individuals can record the actions of the police.
wrong--not if they interfere/etc

If you can show where anyone was interfering you might have a point.
 
There is really something wrong in Minnesota.

Journalists covering a protest in a Minneapolis suburb Friday night were forced on their stomachs by law enforcement, rounded up and were only released after having their face and press credentials photographed.

Police in Minnesota round up journalists covering protest, force them on the ground and take pictures of their faces

Now they are attacking journalists. I understand that they do not like this much coverage but sooner or later they are going to have to realize that people are no longer simply going to accept them violating people's rights.

Obama spied on Journalists, democrats support an out of control pedo Intel establishment...why is this a "Surprise"?
 
It says the journalists were detained, not attacked. Police are allowed, by law, to temporarily detain any individual, regardless of occupation, for reasons of public order and security.

In no way did the police, or government, censor or curtail what the journalists wrote.

Photographing them is a form of intimidation.
It's a way of finding out whether or not they've been infiltrated by agitators, fool.

They can ask for credentials without holding them down and photographing them. All the same, I do NOT have to have credentials to report on their activities.
This ain't a tea party, numbnutz.

Nor does it matter. The courts have consistently ruled that individuals can record the actions of the police.
wrong--not if they interfere/etc

If you can show where anyone was interfering you might have a point.
hhahahahah---you just proved my point--you can't refute it
 
There is really something wrong in Minnesota.

Journalists covering a protest in a Minneapolis suburb Friday night were forced on their stomachs by law enforcement, rounded up and were only released after having their face and press credentials photographed.

Police in Minnesota round up journalists covering protest, force them on the ground and take pictures of their faces

Now they are attacking journalists. I understand that they do not like this much coverage but sooner or later they are going to have to realize that people are no longer simply going to accept them violating people's rights.

Obama spied on Journalists, democrats support an out of control pedo Intel establishment...why is this a "Surprise"?

He did and none of this is OK.
 

Forum List

Back
Top