Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If you believe that you are very stupid or very afraid to say anything.
Oh, not stupid.
I was one of the 11 million - in my estimate - hat voted against Trump.
I was a loyal GOP voter for about 40 years voting for a GOP candidate for President twice in 2016 (once in the Primary, once in the General), and voted against Trump in 2020.
WW
They sent it back to a lower court but said those envelopes are to be examined. It is up to Maricopa to give them up for examination. Why haven't they?Then show us the AZ supreme court overturning the Arizona gubernatorial election and appointing Lake.
Laughing....the moment the AZ Supreme Court contradicts your absurd little fantasy, you'll fold them into your conspiracy too.
You have very little to do with this except that you were fucked also by the massive and obvious fraud.Oh, not stupid.
I was one of the 11 million - in my estimate - that voted against Trump.
I was a loyal GOP voter for about 40 years voting for a GOP candidate for President between 1978 and twice in 2016 (once in the Primary, once in the General), and voted against Trump in 2020.
WW
They sent it back to a lower court but said those envelopes are to be examined. It is up to Maricopa to give them up for examination. Why haven't they?
www.kold.com
You have very little to do with this except that you were fucked also by the massive and obvious fraud.
It is not Maricopa's examination that counts. It is Lake's team. They should be able to easily prove that votes where sent through with scribbles not valid signatures. 17,000 is all they need and it should be no problem at all.Laughing......the AZ supreme court rejected almost every one of Lake's appeals.
Arizona Supreme Court rejects almost all of Lake’s appeals, sends one back to trial court
Arizona Supreme Court rejects almost all of Lake’s appeals, sends one back to trial court
The lower court is ordered to look at whether Maricopa County properly followed the signature verification policies in November’s election.
And who says that Maricopa County hasn't examined those envelopes?
It is not fantasy. You saying it did not happen is the fantasy here."Massive and obvious fraud" says you. Citing you.
Again, your entire argument is predicated on our acceptance of your fantasy as fact. You've gone so far as to insist that unless we 'admit' your argument must be true, that you won't discuss the topic.
But you can't factually establish your claims. You can only allude, insinuate, accuse.
Which is why your record of failure in court is perfect.
Well..it is against State law for them to give that information--and the law provides for an exception.The AZ. Supreme Court does not think so. Why is Maricopa withholding the signature envelopes from inspection? No fraud, no problem. But there seems to be a problem. Again, why is Maricopa not cooperating?
Hi Josh!
We’re not producing the ballot envelopes for the same reason this office has never produced the envelopes pursuant to a PRR:
Because it would be illegal.
State law thinks it’s unwise to give out phone, address, and signature of all voters to anyone who asks. https://t.co/cJexWFwMHz
— Stephen Richer—Maricopa Cnty Recorder (prsnl acct) (@stephen_richer) March 31, 2023
It is not Maricopa's examination that counts. It is Lake's team. They should be able to easily prove that votes where sent through with scribbles not valid signatures. 17,000 is all they need and it should be no problem at all.
Well..it is against State law for them to give that information--and the law provides for an exception.
From your link:
Maricopa County communications director Fields Moseley responded with a link to a tweet Richer posted Friday afternoon following the publication of The Western Journal’s story.
Richer tweeted that it would be illegal to allow Lake’s legal team to see the ballot signatures on file via a public records request.
He wrote, “State law thinks it’s unwise to give out phone, address, and signature of all voters to anyone who asks.”
I am only talking about the signatures. You are the one talking about an opinion from compromised judges that does not mean shit.That's not what the AZ Supreme Court found.
ANd they rejected almost every one of Lake's appeals.
Time to fold them into your conspiracy fantasy too, Last.
I am only talking about the signatures. You are the one talking about an opinion from compromised judges that does not mean shit.
It is legal to let somebody questioning the election examine them. In many states it is the right of every citizen to see the ballots after elections. Good way to keep people honest.No, you're talking about what the AZ Supreme Court has found.
ANd then start to fold in things the AZ Supreme Court has NEVER found. Things that are, in fact, a violation of State Law.
Turning over signatures, addresses, and voter names to Kari Lakes private people is not legal.
It is legal to let somebody questioning the election examine them. In many states it is the right of every citizen to see the ballots after elections. Good way to keep people honest.
It is not Maricopa's examination that counts. It is Lake's team. They should be able to easily prove that votes where sent through with scribbles not valid signatures. 17,000 is all they need and it should be no problem at all.
The have a signature that needs to be checked. Identifying people as a voter violates no rights. It is to keep people honest. Withholding those envelope signatures means those people have not been honest.Psst - Security envelopes are not ballots. Ballots do not contain any personally identifiable information, security envelopes do.
WW
Debunked is no more than denied.What difference to you does that make? You're gonna believe they were illegally ballots counted anyway, even if Lake is unable to prove her claim in court.
Don't forget, FruitLoops, you don't need proof. Debunked rumors are enough for you to believe what you wish was true, is.
Debunked is no more than denied.
All kinds of evidence you deny and the government refuses to investigate. Try the truth troll.30 months (and counting)
0 proof (and not counting)
