Mike Lindell ordered to pay $5M reward to expert who debunked 'rigged election' claims

[Skylar]

Wage theft isn't even illegal.

It depends on the state. Its against the law in say, California. And the degree of protection is also heavily state dependent.

Conservatives generally interpret 'business friendly' as the elimination of protection for workers.

 

[Skylar]

Fyi

The guy who won was a trump voter, and so were the other experts that showed up for the contest.

.

As Ray Epps demonstrates elegantly....it doesn't matter to the deplorables.

 

[Chillicothe]

Grifters gotta grift.

Point well made.
Kudos.

 

[Dragonlady]

If there were anti fraud laws enforced Trump would still be president.

No he wouldn’t because he lost the fucking election by 8 million votes. Most people can’t believe that 74 million fools voted for him the second time.

 

[Lastamender]

No he wouldn’t because he lost the fucking election by 8 million votes. Most people can’t believe that 74 million fools voted for him the second time.

 

[Skylar]

Laughing...if only emojis voted in the electoral college, eh?

 

[Lastamender]

Laughing...if only emojis voted in the electoral college, eh?

If honest men ran things............. Not a chance of that.

 

[Skylar]

If honest men ran things............. Not a chance of that.

Given that you fold anyone who doesn't ape your conspiracy into your conspiracy....what would you know about honesty?

All you know is imagination.

How does imagination work out for you in court? Presidential elections? Gubernatorial elections? The electoral college?

 

[Likkmee]

Damn..the courts are not being kind to the kooks:

MSN

www.msn.com

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell has been ordered to pay $5 million to an expert who debunked his claims about the 2020 election, CNN reported.
Lindell, who pushes mass voter fraud conspiracy theories, vowed to award a multimillion-dollar prize to any cyber security expert who could disprove his claims. An arbitration panel awarded software developer Robert Zeidman the $5 million payout on Wednesday after he sued Lindell.
“Based on the foregoing analysis, Mr. Zeidman performed under the contract,” the arbitration panel wrote in its decision. “He proved the data Lindell LLC provided, and represented reflected information from the November 2020 election, unequivocally did not reflect November 2020 election data. Failure to pay Mr. Zeidman the $5 million prized was a breach of the contract, entitling him to recover.”
Zeidman signed up for the challenge and found Lindell’s data to be "largely nonsensical," CNN reported.

 

[Skylar]

 

[Lastamender]

Given that you fold anyone who doesn't ape your conspiracy into your conspiracy....what would you know about honesty?

All you know is imagination.

How does imagination work out for you in court? Presidential elections? Gubernatorial elections? The electoral college?

It is not imagination. It happened right out in the open.

 

[Skylar]

It is not imagination. It happened right out in the open.

Its utterly imagination. Which is why it fails so utterly in court, which demands evidence.

And why you fold in the courts to your silly little fantasy. Just like you did the DOJ. And the Attorney General. And the Maricopa County Election Board. And the Governor of Georgia.

And, and, and.

With your absurd fantasy getting more complicated, more fantastically elaborate, more ludicrously implausible with each new group you try to wrap up in it.

No thank you.

 

[SweetSue92]

Given that you fold anyone who doesn't ape your conspiracy into your conspiracy....what would you know about honesty?

All you know is imagination.

How does imagination work out for you in court? Presidential elections? Gubernatorial elections? The electoral college?

Secession might work out beautifully for us.

In the meantime, people fleeing all your beloved Blue Cities and areas.

Nothing--and I mean NOTHING--is the win you think it is. All your wins are dark. All of them. Nothing built on lies and corruption will last.

 

[Skylar]

Secession might work out beautifully for us.

In the meantime, people fleeing all your beloved Blue Cities and areas.

Nothing--and I mean NOTHING--is the win you think it is. All your wins are dark. All of them. Nothing built on lies and corruption will last.

Secession is illegal. The issue has already been adjudicated.

You'll need another pseudo-legal pipe dream.

 

[SweetSue92]

Secession is illegal. The issue has already been adjudicated.

You'll need another pseudo-legal pipe dream.

"Illegal"? What does "Illegal" mean? By whose definition?

Listen pal, when you destroy the legal system it blows up in YOUR face too. Enjoy that.

 

[Skylar]

"Illegal"? What does "Illegal" mean? By whose definition?

Listen pal, when you destroy the legal system it blows up in YOUR face too. Enjoy that.

The Supreme Court, which has already found that States lack the authority to secede. Making any secession a violation of the constitution. And thus illegal.

But you know better, huh?

You're gonna need better quality pseudo-legal gibberish to justify your Neo-confederate nonsense.

 

[SweetSue92]

The Supreme Court, which has already found that States lack the authority to secede. Making any secession a violation of the constitution. And thus illegal.

But you know better, huh?

You're gonna need better quality pseudo-legal gibberish.

Again when you destroy the legal system and make it a joke, don't be surprised when desperate people take the joke all the way.

Burning your own house down.

Enjoy that.

 

[Skylar]

Again when you destroy the legal system and make it a joke, don't be surprised when desperate people take the joke all the way.

Burning your own house down.

Enjoy that.

Yawning......sorry, Sue. But your ilk not liking an election result isn't 'destroying the legal system'.

Its just you poor souls not understanding the law, and bringing dogshit arguments to the court that invariably fail.

If you want to do better in court, reason better. Support your claims factually. Read a little about the law first.

 

[SweetSue92]

Yawning......sorry, Sue. But your ilk not liking an election result isn't 'destroying the legal system'.

Its just you poor souls not understanding the law, and bringing dogshit arguments to the court that invariably fail.

If you want to do better in court, reason better. Support your claims factually. Read a little about the law first.

We are way, and I mean WAY--beyond that.

We're all about to find out what happens to a country in financial destruction with a medicated, spoiled population who does not trust any of the institutions. And you keep dancing around like a clown, like your political "wins" mean a damn thing.

Go on then. Good luck.

 

[Skylar]

We are way, and I mean WAY--beyond that.

We're all about to find out what happens to a country in financial destruction with a medicated, spoiled population who does not trust any of the institutions. And you keep dancing around like a clown, like your political "wins" mean a damn thing.

Go on then. Good luck.

No, Sue. We're not. Your ilk have elaborate fantasies where you're invariably victims of some grand plot, financial destruction, or legal catastrophe.

The reality is far simpler: You simply have no idea what you're talking about.

You don't understand our laws, our constitution, or in the case of Mike Lindell and his spectacular failure, how arbitration works.