The majority of analytics provided, by Trumpists, are observational. There is complete ignorance to statistically significant analytics.
In defense of everyone who falls for this stuff, it is quite complicated.
I appreciate your honesty. You know analytics.
Facts matter to me.
There is no evidence of a fraud that would stand up in court.
I think the Texas lawsuit had the best merit. Unfortunately, the SCOTUS decided not to hear it, as (I think) they did not want to jump into the political arena and override the states' legislatures which certified votes that were not in accordance with existing laws, as the mail-in votes in many states, and other changes, were not approved by the legislature and were simply made by unelected officials. It wasn't fraud though, but it was clearly unconstitutional, IMO.
There was plenty of fraud that would stand up in court. The question is, was it of sufficient magnitude.
Lots of dead people voted.
Ballots were harvested from places like nursing homes and low income housing.
People voted in two states.
Ineligible felons voting.
And so on.
Stuff like that, but it happens at small scale all the time.
It is treasonous to call the life blood of our democracy, voting, fraudulent, without proof.
Our enemies are loving the claims of voter fraud. It weakens our world wide strength. Those who weaken our nation are traitors. They are strengthening our enemies and weakening our nation. Ultimate assholes. I would rather have illegal immigrants than the pieces of shit that advocate a lie hurting our nation.
I disagree. It is patriotic to attempt to ensure election integrity, even if one is incorrect, as long as one's motivations are noble.
Regards,
Jim