crooksandliars.com
Sounds like protecting the guilty to me.UPDATED: Mike Johnson Admits To Obstructing Justice By Altering J6 Video
The Speaker of the House is blurring faces in order to stop the DOJ from prosecuting them. I'm fairly sure that's called obstruction of justice.
I wonder if Mike would get techs to spend hours and thousands of dollars to distort these people faces if they were black or BLM?
What do you think?
Considering that Democrats have viewed these videos (for a very long time) and did nothing, it's obvious they are arresting people now out pure spite. Their narrative of a violent insurrection has been proven false and an obvious set-up by the DC mayor, Pelosi, capital police and the FBI/CIA and they want revenge.UPDATED: Mike Johnson Admits To Obstructing Justice By Altering J6 Video
The Speaker of the House is blurring faces in order to stop the DOJ from prosecuting them. I'm fairly sure that's called obstruction of justice.
I wonder if Mike would get techs to spend hours and thousands of dollars to distort these people faces if they were black or BLM?
What do you think?
I think you should apologize to the board for posting your false title and your nonsensical comments.UPDATED: Mike Johnson Admits To Obstructing Justice By Altering J6 Video
The Speaker of the House is blurring faces in order to stop the DOJ from prosecuting them. I'm fairly sure that's called obstruction of justice.
I wonder if Mike would get techs to spend hours and thousands of dollars to distort these people faces if they were black or BLM?
What do you think?
are you saying the doj doesnt have the vids without the faces blurred ?
No, Mike Johnson is protecting a bunch of criminals from being identified. The man who calls himself a Christian is harboring criminals and should be prosecuted himself.
The DOJ has them, but it they were made public there are millions of people out there who could help identify the scum.
Why Everybody is reporting it. You prefer your new censored, even on political message boards?
www.foxnews.com
I assume they do. Why would it matter if not presently part of evidence? It is not like the DOJ is the owner of the House surveilance videos. The videos under control of the house are (it appears) controlled by the house and specifically by the Speaker of the House. He thought it important to release the videos of the attack, just not showing the faces of the attackers.
It seems that Patriotism has a new meaning. If you deny an elections, attack and try to disrupt a certifications, and violently attack those whose duty was to protect the US Capitol...you are not a Patriot, in the eyes of MAGA
Yep. Who knew, they were that self-aware?It seems that Patriotism has a new meaning. If you deny an elections, attack and try to disrupt a certifications, and violently attack those whose duty was to protect the US Capitol...you are not a Patriot, in the eyes of MAGA
And Mike Johnson, the self professed "Christian" is desperately trying to conceal the "Patriots" names and identify. Yes, he calls himself a friend to law enforcement.
i said once before i dont care if the faces are revealed or blurred ..
Yes, but your speaker does. That was the point of all the stories in all the media outlets. He may be your speaker, but he needs a press secretary or somfn'
you dont like the speaker ? he seems to be a good honest man ..Yes, but your speaker does. That was the point of all the stories in all the media outlets. He may be your speaker, but he needs a press secretary or somfn'
Not really. I'm not looking to change to an autocracy or a theocracy, so he's useless.
we are already rushing towards an autocracy .. a democratic party autocracy .
