So why did he sue the recount, can you coherently answer?
The same laws which allow for recounts, offer the other side legal protections too. In Michigan the suit that stopped the count was entered by the Michigan Attorney General. So...can you coherently accept that?
What protection was Trump seeking and why? What was threatening him?
You aren't answering.
1. Suit was brought by a party who was not injured. Stein only received 1% of the vote here.
2. Federal court broke states rights by demanding the recount before Michigan law allowed.
3. No evidence of fraud or errors was presented in making the case for a recount.
In short, it was a baseless request. The judge agreed.
Judge agreed, after Trump sued.
You aren't answering WHY Trump did this instead of letting the recount go ahead.
WHY doesn't Trump want a recount and a review after aaaalllll this incendiary, democracy undermining rhetoric about how our election system is rigged?
I have an answer - he is a ******* windbag willing to shamelessly lie and cross any line or convention of decency. His claims were nothing but pissing gasoline on his supporters inflamed zeal. He didn't give a shit what it does to this democracy and institutions that support it, he just wanted his base fired up by whatever lies necessary.
Your not hearing!
"Washington (CNN)Michigan's attorney general announced Friday (Dec 2nd) he would file suit to stop a recount requested by Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein.
"Today I am filing suit to stop @DrJillStein's frivolous, expensive recount request," Bill Schuette, a Republican, wrote on Twitter."
Michigan attorney general files lawsuit to stop recount - CNNPolitics.com
You're doing what Liberals do. When facts don't match what it is they believe, they ask the same question in different ways trying to get an answer that meets their approval. When that doesn't work they protest, trying to change reality. Both makes them annoying, juvenile, and proves they're world class butt hurt.
