Michelle O's School lunch nightmare, Obama kids school NOT INCLUDED

[ricechickie]

Those are outrageous stories. By the way, Theowl32's last link was about a school throwing away its own provided lunch because some kids were past due on payments. Which is stupid, too.

However, in the vast majority of schools in the United States, parents have a choice to send in a lunch from home, and these other schools should stop the ridiculous programs of "inspecting" them, if they haven't already.

 

[jillian]

Gee I wonder why the Obama daughters eat nice lunches at school? Maybe because they go to a prestigious school? Class envy is ripe with this one.

thought the Obamas were for the "people" ?


guess it's , like Holder, their people

funny how the rabid right loves wealth and class

except for the president.

do you think a public school should deal with secret service.

obama derangement syndrome at its finest

 

[ricechickie]

.....I mean, unless the lunch from home included heroin or something.....

How many kids do you have and what do you put in their lunches?

None of your business,

and it depended.

Usually a bologna sandwich, dry, every day for a year (all he would eat that year). A kind of fresh or canned fruit. Sometimes, crackers and cream cheese. Juice. Usually no vegetable. A cheese stick.

You're asking me to go back some years in my memory. The bologna sandwich is what stands out the most.

 

[ricechickie]

Liberals, are such a ******* disaster. Another day, another story of the government take over of all our choices in life.

Another day another illustration of blatant liberal double talk and hypocrisy.

Right. Because those kids have no choice. Eat the food, or go hungry.

I mean, unless their parents decide to send in a lunch from home.

No, that can't be right; that would be another choice.

schools have been known to confiscate lunches that came from home

and god forbid one of your kids eating a sandwich into the shape

of a pistol

I have heard of one case of that kind of nonsense. And I wouldn't stand for it.

And it wouldn't be a pistol.....it would be a wonky letter L.

the real dilemma is when it comes to a banana

is it a pistol (banned)

or is it a practice penis for condom education (permitted)

--LOL

Put the condom in the lunch and the answer becomes apparent.

 

[JFK_USA]

Gee I wonder why the Obama daughters eat nice lunches at school? Maybe because they go to a prestigious school? Class envy is ripe with this one.

What's hilarious is they claim democrats play the class warfare card and then they turn around and play the same card when it favors them. Hypocrite overload.

 

[Rotagilla]

.....I mean, unless the lunch from home included heroin or something.....

How many kids do you have and what do you put in their lunches?

None of your business,

and it depended.

Usually a bologna sandwich, dry, every day for a year (all he would eat that year). A kind of fresh or canned fruit. Sometimes, crackers and cream cheese. Juice. Usually no vegetable. A cheese stick.

You're asking me to go back some years in my memory. The bologna sandwich is what stands out the most.

...but that doesn't meet gvmt nutritional standards...You were in "violation". That's child abuse. Why did you abuse your child by denying him a nutritious lunch? Only the gvmt should be allowed to decide what parent's can put in their child's lunch.

See how that works?

 

[ricechickie]

.....I mean, unless the lunch from home included heroin or something.....

How many kids do you have and what do you put in their lunches?

None of your business,

and it depended.

Usually a bologna sandwich, dry, every day for a year (all he would eat that year). A kind of fresh or canned fruit. Sometimes, crackers and cream cheese. Juice. Usually no vegetable. A cheese stick.

You're asking me to go back some years in my memory. The bologna sandwich is what stands out the most.

...but that doesn't meet gvmt nutritional standards...You were in "violation". That's child abuse. Why did you abuse your child by denying him a nutritious lunch? Only the gvmt should be allowed to decide what parent's can put in their child's lunch.

See how that works?

You seem to want to argue that lunches from home shouldn't be inspected or confiscated.

Almost as if I've disagreed with that somewhere on here.

 

[Rotagilla]

You seem to want to argue that lunches from home shouldn't be inspected or confiscated.

Yes. Exactly.
You seem to be arguing that gvmt should decide for others..Not "you" of course.You put whatever you wanted to in your childs lunch....you just want others to have to comply with a useless and intrusive statist policy that doesn't affect you.

Almost as if I've disagreed with that somewhere on here.

Surrender all decisions to the gvmt. is your statist premise.

 

[candycorn]

Gee I wonder why the Obama daughters eat nice lunches at school? Maybe because they go to a prestigious school? Class envy is ripe with this one.

What's hilarious is they claim democrats play the class warfare card and then they turn around and play the same card when it favors them. Hypocrite overload.

The OP is, as always, hilarious and really not worth responding to.

The theme, however, is pretty intense....Pelosi liberalism is probably the last thing the Democrats should embrace from their own end of the spectrum. As a liberal, I roll my eyes when I hear stories like the schools confiscating lunch.

 

[Freewill]

Gee I wonder why the Obama daughters eat nice lunches at school? Maybe because they go to a prestigious school? Class envy is ripe with this one.

Class envy or income inequality? Oh right....both ways....got it.

And Michelle Obama is trying to do something about it

Which one? Class envy or income inequality? Of course what she is doing is making both worse. Or should I say her husband?

 

[Freewill]

An image of the perfect child, to a liberal. Or for that matter any democrat following the rich democrat aristocrat leaders:

 

[Rotagilla]

An image of the perfect child, to a liberal. Or for that matter any democrat following the rich democrat aristocrat leaders:

That puppet is white..you're a racist. /sarc

 

[ricechickie]

You seem to want to argue that lunches from home shouldn't be inspected or confiscated.

Yes. Exactly.
You seem to be arguing that gvmt should decide for others..Not "you" of course.You put whatever you wanted to in your childs lunch....you just want others to have to comply with a useless and intrusive statist policy that doesn't affect you.

Almost as if I've disagreed with that somewhere on here.

Surrender all decisions to the gvmt. is your statist premise.

No. But a public school is not a restaurant. Nobody's going to make your kid something to order.

If people are going to avail themselves of the school-provided lunch, then it's going to meet some standards. Those standards might change from time to time. Ketchup will no longer be considered a vegetable.

If you don't like it, then make your choice to send in a lunch from home. If the school in question is being overly intrusive about your homemade lunch, then fight like hell. Or home school.

See? Choices abound.

 

[Rotagilla]

You seem to want to argue that lunches from home shouldn't be inspected or confiscated.

Yes. Exactly.
You seem to be arguing that gvmt should decide for others..Not "you" of course.You put whatever you wanted to in your childs lunch....you just want others to have to comply with a useless and intrusive statist policy that doesn't affect you.

Almost as if I've disagreed with that somewhere on here.

Surrender all decisions to the gvmt. is your statist premise.

No. But a public school is not a restaurant. Nobody's going to make your kid something to order.

No one said they should. We're talking about intrusive gvmt policies.

If people are going to avail themselves of the school-provided lunch, then it's going to meet some standards.

We're talking about schools inspecting home made lunches for "compliance".

Those standards might change from time to time. Ketchup will no longer be considered a vegetable.

Where did anyone say ketchup was considered a vegetable? When you're cornered, distraction might work on some people...not others.

If you don't like it, then make your choice to send in a lunch from home. If the school in question is being overly intrusive about your homemade lunch, then fight like hell. Or home school.

Keeping gvmt out of it isn't an option to you, though..

Home schooling is the best way to keep your children from being indoctrinated and lied to, but unfortunately most people have to work for a living and can't.

Private schools are a better, but more expensive, way to keep your children's minds from being warped by lies, misinformation, propaganda and socialist "common core" nonsense.

The gvmt has no business being involved in "education" anyway.

 

[bodecea]

Gee I wonder why the Obama daughters eat nice lunches at school? Maybe because they go to a prestigious school? Class envy is ripe with this one.

And now...the Right is reduced to whining about the President's childrens lunches. This is really sad...and quite funny...all at once.

 

[ricechickie]

You seem to want to argue that lunches from home shouldn't be inspected or confiscated.

Yes. Exactly.
You seem to be arguing that gvmt should decide for others..Not "you" of course.You put whatever you wanted to in your childs lunch....you just want others to have to comply with a useless and intrusive statist policy that doesn't affect you.

Almost as if I've disagreed with that somewhere on here.

Surrender all decisions to the gvmt. is your statist premise.

No. But a public school is not a restaurant. Nobody's going to make your kid something to order.

No one said they should. We're talking about intrusive gvmt policies.

If people are going to avail themselves of the school-provided lunch, then it's going to meet some standards.

We're talking about schools inspecting home made lunches for "compliance".

Those standards might change from time to time. Ketchup will no longer be considered a vegetable.

Where did anyone say ketchup was considered a vegetable? When you're cornered, distraction might work on some people...not others.

If you don't like it, then make your choice to send in a lunch from home. If the school in question is being overly intrusive about your homemade lunch, then fight like hell. Or home school.

Keeping gvmt out of it isn't an option to you, though..

Home schooling is the best way to keep your children from being indoctrinated and lied to, but unfortunately most people have to work for a living and can't.

Private schools are a better, but more expensive, way to keep your children's minds from being warped by lies, misinformation, propaganda and socialist "common core" nonsense.

The gvmt has no business being involved in "education" anyway.

Wait. If by intrusive government policies, you mean inspecting and possibly dumping a kid's home-prepared lunch, then we agree. IT SHOULDN'T HAPPEN.

 

[Rotagilla]

You seem to want to argue that lunches from home shouldn't be inspected or confiscated.

Yes. Exactly.
You seem to be arguing that gvmt should decide for others..Not "you" of course.You put whatever you wanted to in your childs lunch....you just want others to have to comply with a useless and intrusive statist policy that doesn't affect you.

Almost as if I've disagreed with that somewhere on here.

Surrender all decisions to the gvmt. is your statist premise.

No. But a public school is not a restaurant. Nobody's going to make your kid something to order.

No one said they should. We're talking about intrusive gvmt policies.

If people are going to avail themselves of the school-provided lunch, then it's going to meet some standards.

We're talking about schools inspecting home made lunches for "compliance".

Those standards might change from time to time. Ketchup will no longer be considered a vegetable.

Where did anyone say ketchup was considered a vegetable? When you're cornered, distraction might work on some people...not others.

If you don't like it, then make your choice to send in a lunch from home. If the school in question is being overly intrusive about your homemade lunch, then fight like hell. Or home school.

Keeping gvmt out of it isn't an option to you, though..

Home schooling is the best way to keep your children from being indoctrinated and lied to, but unfortunately most people have to work for a living and can't.

Private schools are a better, but more expensive, way to keep your children's minds from being warped by lies, misinformation, propaganda and socialist "common core" nonsense.

The gvmt has no business being involved in "education" anyway.

Wait. If by intrusive government policies, you mean inspecting and possibly dumping a kid's home-prepared lunch, then we agree. IT SHOULDN'T HAPPEN.

Oh..Ok..as I read back I see where I must have misunderstood you.
I apologize for my error.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Obama Girls Enjoy Best School Lunch in America Public Schoolers Lament Let s Move Meals CNS News

This link shows you what the spoiled and pampered Obama kids have for lunch.


This link : This is the public school Serf lunch..
Michelle O s Lunch Rules Sour First Day Of School Student Fighting Back Politics


Who elected this woman to any office to FORCE children to eat a bunch of batshyt crazy vegan shit? I don't recall her being up for election.. If she wants to step in to the political limelight she had best be prepared for what's going to come her way. How come her kids aren't included in this slop being served to the Public school serfs?

Vegan? No. You're a moron

Great reply from a libtsrded idiot.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Republicans once again demonstrate their extreme hatred of all things Obama

So much so that they even come out against healthy lunches for schoolchildren

Fimwits once again prove their stupid rules are stupid. STFU idiot.

 

[bodecea]

You seem to want to argue that lunches from home shouldn't be inspected or confiscated.

Yes. Exactly.
You seem to be arguing that gvmt should decide for others..Not "you" of course.You put whatever you wanted to in your childs lunch....you just want others to have to comply with a useless and intrusive statist policy that doesn't affect you.

Almost as if I've disagreed with that somewhere on here.

Surrender all decisions to the gvmt. is your statist premise.

You should really try actually reading someone's post before commenting, you know.