There are just too many questionable things coming to light:
1. Terri's brother stated that they have
no good explaination for Terri's condition. It is highly unlikey a 26 yo suffered a heart attack causing the chemical imbalance for which there seems to be no definite reason. However it is said that such a condition could very likely result from physical blows.
2. Michael is a very controlling type person. There appears to have been a pattern of abuse with Terri before the "collapse".
3. Michael lost 6 jobs in 2 years before the "collapse".
4. Michael started dating 18 months after Terri's "collapse".
5. Michael wants Terri's body cremated with no chance of any autopsy.
6. No MRI scan has ever been done.
7. The judge refused to order a swallow test. Some nurses said they used to feed Terri with a baby bottle, fed her gruel-like food, jello, and the like.
8. The judge rejected admittance of the claim/police report by the nurse who thinks Michael attempted to kill Terri with insulin injections.
Who actually is representing Terri? Her life has been placed basically in the hands of one judge who appears to be relying mainly on the testimony of only the husband and discounting everybody else in Terri's life.
If there is
any question regarding a death sentence for someone in Terri's condition, why can't they have an open court trial to decide with a jury made up of her peers who get to listen to all the evidence before she is sentenced to her death???? Why should their life depend on the decision of an arrogant judge or judges who may not value such a life as Terri's? It's the very
least we would give to any husband who murdered his wife.