JiggsCasey
VIP Member
- Jan 12, 2010
- 991
- 122
- 78
so has the creation of modern sewage systems, drinkable and safe water for hundreds of millions, roads so ambulances can save people, and the production of hydrocarbons to make all these other things possible.
Feel free to live in a mud hut with a solar panel on top to run your nightlight, but as long as you are typing on a product containing the benefits of hydrocarbon production, using electricity to run it partially produced by hydrocarbon production, and undoubtedly drive, ride or fly in some form of propulsion at some point in time each month, you are just being a hypocrite.
This is the most retarded logic your camp uses, time after time after time. "Oh? But you're using a computer, so STFU." ...

Could you come off as more of an infantile moron whenever you attempt this ruse? ... Your argument is a little like someone saying: "what? you're bitching about taxes? well f**k you the next time you call the fire department." ... Holy crap, miss the point much?
No one disputes that oil isn't the most versatile and efficient form of energy we've ever harnessed. No one is ungrateful for what it has provided complex modern societies. You're such a straw-man champion.
It's not "hypocritical" at all, drama queen. We just have very different opinions of the landscape going forward, what the timeline shows, and how to prepare for them.
If anything, I'd say you Adam Smith drones are the ones who are ungrateful, because you take for granted a source that should have been $75-100/bl 20 years ago, and you believe the inevitable transition to something else will be seamless.
Last edited: