If this was you or I as a civilian using a firearm for self defense, and had 100% control of the situation, and fired just because he reached...weād be locked away.
Obviously you don't live in the great state of Florida.
I believe in stand your ground laws, if somebody is threatening your life, youāre allowe to use lethal force if need be...if youāre referring to tavon Austin, Iād say bashing someoneās head against the curb qualifies as that. If it was the other way around, and tavon was having his head bashed on the curb, then Iād be siding with tavon as well. But that wasnāt the case, I still think Zimmerman is a douche, but douches have a right to protect themselves too.
But the shooting in the OP, much different situation. Police clearly had full control.
If I was a cop I wouldn't believe myself to have full control until the threat was neutralized and the room cleared. Until such time everything is a judgement call. Trained professionals are constantly placed under the microscope for their judgement calls because the profession requires it, no way untrained people should be given the same latitude. Zimmerman had no reason to engage Martin. The cop was doing his job.
No reason?? Thereās no body cam, how the hell do you know what happened? All we know is that there was a commotion started, and witness reports were in line with Zimmerman testimony, as well as Zimmermanās injuries. Unless Zimmerman went in full fledged attack on travon, thereās no excuse to bash someoneās head against the curb, thatās on Martin. So whatever reason Zimmerman chose to talk to Martin doesnāt really matter, since itās not too difficult to say, you shouldnāt go bashing peopleās heads against concrete corners. And from all the evidence and testimony we gathered, thatās what happened. Iāve seen people in the Hospital for months over less, weāre talking high force, small surface area onto something with ZERO give. Very bad combination, very dangerous. It might have well been a bolted down anvil.
āIf Iām a cop I wouldnāt believe myself to have full control until...ā
NO, thatās where this ridiculous notion of, āwell you never know whatās gonna happen, so when in doubt shootā is 100% wrong. OUR SOLDIERS WOULD GET CHARGED WITH MURDER OVER SOMETHING LIKE THIS...IN WARZONES, SURROUNDED WITH PEOPLE WHO ARE ACTUALLY TRYING TO KILL THEM. THIS WAS 100% avoidable. And this is why soldiers make great cops, because they needed to correctly identify threats, remain in control of both THEMSELVES and the situation, and make the right calls in situations 1000% more volatile than this...if they donāt their ass is grass. Not the case for our own CITIZENS (not soldiers) that we entrust to protect and serve, if anything their standards should be higher. Soldiers have been giving life sentences for far less. Situations NEED more effort to be diffused, and police NEED to correctly identify threats. Itād be one thing if this cop was caught off guard, his weapon was trained on him before he walked out the door. Shooting this blubbering kid on his hands and knees could have been handled 20 different ways, the officer not only fired before identifying a threat, but he put HIMSELF into that situation pretty much 2 minutes into it. where in his mind, there was zero room for error. He gave control back to a kid whose mind was racing 1000 miles an hour, no reason for that. Let the other officer secure the the other suspect first, then handle the kid in the proper way, 2 on 1, suspect face down on the ground, palms on the ground, laying still. Instead of giving a scared shitless kid 10 different orders to follow, and allowing him to freely move towards you. Clearly that kid was not capable of making decisions for himself, the officer in that situation was supposed to make the decisions for him, as in on the ground face down legs crossed. As well as 10 other variations that couldāve/shouldāve been used before that.