How the Left Stole Christmas
Merry Birth of Guru Gobind Singh Day!
By Tom Piatak
I am sure I have always thought of Christmas time, when it has come roundapart from the veneration due to its sacred name and origin, if anything can be apart from thatas a good time: a kind, forgiving, charitable, pleasant time: the only time I know of, in the long calendar of the year, when men and women seem by one consent to open their shut up hearts freely, and to think of people below them as if they really were fellow passengers to the grave, and not another race of creatures bound on other journeys.
These words of Scrooges nephew describe Christmas in the America of my youth. Christmas was a special and wonderful time of year, marked by kindness and good cheer, with its myriad celebrations all viewed as ultimately stemming from the birth of the One who, in Dickens words, made lame beggars walk and blind men see.
Todays consensus is different. In last years made-for-cable movie Christmas Rush, one character wishes another Merry Christmas, only to be told, Gee, that is politically incorrect. And so it is. In one generationI was born in 1964Christmas has gone from being a widespread and joyous public celebration to the holiday that dare not speak its name. We now have holiday trees, holiday cards, holiday parties, holiday songs, and even, in one particularly egregious advertisement, a childs first holiday. Simply put, there is now raging a War Against Christmas, in author Peter Brimelows trenchant phrase.
A hallmark of this war is an aggressive multiculturalism that has elevated a variety of formerly obscure or even non-existent festivals into faux-Christmases, principally Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, and now Ramadan, but also Diwali, Bodhi Day, the Birth of Guru Gobind Singh, Dongji, and Chinese New Year. The reason for the elevation of these holidays is their proximity to Christmas, not their cultural significance or intrinsic worth. Indeed, Kwanzaa was invented in 1966, Hanukkah is traditionally a minor holiday (with no basis in the canonical Hebrew Bible), and Ramadan was virtually unknown in America until a few short years ago. Despite their recent provenanceat least as pseudo-Christmasesthese holidays are now treated as coequals of Christmas, with public figures sure to pepper any of the increasingly rare mentions of Christmas with references to at least some of these others.
The desire to efface Christmas that lies behind the elevation of Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, and all the rest is illustrated by recent developments in the New York City public schools. The Thomas More Law Center is now suing the school system, which bans Nativity scenes but regularly display menorahs and Muslim crescents. Nor are the schools trying to rectify this now that their hostility to Christianity has been put in the spotlight. Instead, they are vigorously defending the ban, claiming that the suggestion that a crèche is a historically accurate representation of an event with secular significance is wholly disingenuous. The birth of the most important figure in history carries no weight in New York City, nor does the fact that the birth was first depicted in a crèche by another seminal historical figure, an itinerant friar from Assisi named Francis. It does not take a belief in the divinity of Christ or the sanctity of Francis to recognize their tremendous impact on the history and culture of the West. Apparently, though, the multiculturalists are eager to promote every culture but our own.
That the war against Christmas is part of a broader war against Western culture is shown by last years winner of VDARE.coms invaluable War Against Christmas competition. The Columbus, Ohio, schools banned a performance of Handels Messiah, which for the previous nine years had been the highlight of the year at a specialized school for the arts. The performance would have violated the districts religious-music policy, which came into being as the result of an ACLU lawsuit. According to the Columbus Dispatch, the policy stipulated that the proportion of religious music performed in concert be no more than 30 percent and that the performance of religious music be based on sound curricular reasons and not manifest a preference for religion or particular religious beliefs. The educational bureaucrats who devised the policy, trying to be helpful, suggested the students perform Frosty the Snowman or Jingle Bells instead of Handel. Their ignorance and philistinism is appalling, though characteristic of those waging the War Against Christmas. After hearing Messiah performed in London, Haydn was moved to exclaim, Handel is the master of us all! and to write his own great oratorio, The Creation. But, in todays climate of sensitivity and tolerance, beauty and artistic merit are scarcely a sufficient warrant for exposing delicate ears to the name of Christ....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
....The result of sanitizing Christmas is now within sight: an undistinguished, uninspiring public celebration, devoid of religious or cultural significance or indeed of beauty, with nothing left but multiculturalist pap and tawdry commercialism. I do not believe that grim fate is inevitable. But that future will indeed be ours if we remain so unnerved by the thought of giving offense to those looking for a reason to be offended that we are afraid to celebrate our own culture, tradition, and religion.