Merrick Garland Does His Election Interference Act by Giving Jack Smith the OK to Re-Indict Trump

[struth]

If any had any doubt what a miserable partisan hack Garland is, that doubt was washed away today.

Hell, the DOJ has a 90-day rule, no indictments within 90 days of an election, violated their own rule.

1. Election interference, big time, by Reichsleiter Merrick Garland (who had to approve this). This is so obvious that it will likely gain Trump hundreds of thousands of votes in the next few days (early voting begins in some states next week).

2. Seems to be a violation of the laches doctrine and I expect Trump attorneys to move to dismiss because of laches, and whatever Chutkin does will go to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, then back to SCOTUS.

That is how worried the Democrats are.

He can’t undo the courts order, up to the circuit court of appeals

 

[Foxfyre]

The definition of fascism and communism includes


having "show trials" of dissidents and political opposition

That is true. After a bloody struggle for power after Lenin's death in1924, Stalin emerged head of the Communist Party and established Stalinism which is the fascist/totalitarians stage of Marxism. In the 1930's he ordered the public show trials dubbed the "the Moscow trials" to publicly shame, discredit and silence any remaining criticism and/or opposition to the Russian Communist Party. Using manufactured charges to bring political opponents to trial, no judge dared challenge Stalin by not delivering a conviction. Those convicted were imprisoned; many were executed.

 

[evenflow1969]

The definition of fascism and communism includes


having "show trials" of dissidents and political opposition

Lol, maybe don't send thousands of people to kill your vp ya don't get indicted. Lol, what is funny is the stupid trumpersters were to incompetent to do the job. Lol, hundreds upon hundreds went to jail getting railed by Bubba. Good stuff.

 

[Marener]

?? They accelerated the case.

Supreme Court declines to fast-track Trump immunity dispute in blow to special counsel

Special counsel Jack Smith asked the Supreme Court to bypass the appeals court and decide whether former President Donald Trump is immune from federal prosecution.

www.cbsnews.com

 

[Rawley]

Supreme Court declines to fast-track Trump immunity dispute in blow to special counsel

Special counsel Jack Smith asked the Supreme Court to bypass the appeals court and decide whether former President Donald Trump is immune from federal prosecution.

www.cbsnews.com

"The case came to the Court on an accelerated basis. In August 2023, a grand jury indicted former President Donald Trump on four charges related to his actions after the 2020 presidential election. On Feb. 6, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that Special Counsel Jack L. Smith could move forward with a trial. On Feb. 28, 2024, the Supreme Court granted a stay of that decision, and accepted review of the case, holding oral arguments in the case on April 25."

Supreme Court tackles history with Trump’s immunity case | Constitution Center

On Thursday, the nine justices on the U.S. Supreme Court tackled a question “for the ages” in the Trump v. United States immunity case arguments. But after nearly two hours and 40 minutes of questioning, the case’s outcome seems uncertain.

constitutioncenter.org

 

[Maxdeath]

Keep telling yourself that

Best you start getting your stolen election whining ready

Have no plans to whine. But if Harris does pull off a win I will laugh and point a finger at every idiot that voted for her when they whine after she screws them over

 

[struth]

Have no plans to whine. But if Harris does pull off a win I will laugh and point a finger at every idiot that voted for her when they whine after she screws them over

They are already making excuses for her screwing then over

 

[excalibur]

 

[rightwinger]

Have no plans to whine. But if Harris does pull off a win I will laugh and point a finger at every idiot that voted for her when they whine after she screws them over

Really?
Who won the 2020 election?

 

[Moonglow]

If any had any doubt what a miserable partisan hack Garland is, that doubt was washed away today.

Hell, the DOJ has a 90-day rule, no indictments within 90 days of an election, violated their own rule.

1. Election interference, big time, by Reichsleiter Merrick Garland (who had to approve this). This is so obvious that it will likely gain Trump hundreds of thousands of votes in the next few days (early voting begins in some states next week).

2. Seems to be a violation of the laches doctrine and I expect Trump attorneys to move to dismiss because of laches, and whatever Chutkin does will go to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, then back to SCOTUS.

That is how worried the Democrats are.

Bend over Donald...

 

[Maxdeath]

Really?
Who won the 2020 election?

Since you need reminding of even the simplest of things the worst president in our countries history Biden.
See you are dealing with a democrats worst nightmare an independent voter. I choose the best candidate based on facts not who has the all important D or R. You on the other hand would vote for a fence post if it had that all important D.

 

[rightwinger]

Since you need reminding of even the simplest of things the worst president in our countries history Biden.
See you are dealing with a democrats worst nightmare an independent voter. I choose the best candidate based on facts not who has the all important D or R. You on the other hand would vote for a fence post if it had that all important D.

Good to hear Mr Independent

Who was the last Democratic President you voted for?

 

[Maxdeath]

Good to hear Mr Independent

Who was the last Democratic President you voted for?

I do not have to ask who you voted for because you would never vote for anyone other than a democrat.
I have voted for many Republicans and a number of Democrats. I wish we had better candidates to choose from but unfortunately both parties have been putting forth bad candidates for a number of years.
But I have to tell you the Democrats putting forward a dementia patient then trying to do it again by constantly lying about how sharp he was was a very bad look. It showed a complete lack of truthfulness. Then to try and save the election they put forth Harris. Since you are voting for her it shows that you will vote strictly for the D

 

[rightwinger]

I do not have to ask who you voted for because you would never vote for anyone other than a democrat.
I have voted for many Republicans and a number of Democrats. I wish we had better candidates to choose from but unfortunately both parties have been putting forth bad candidates for a number of years.
But I have to tell you the Democrats putting forward a dementia patient then trying to do it again by constantly lying about how sharp he was was a very bad look. It showed a complete lack of truthfulness. Then to try and save the election they put forth Harris. Since you are voting for her it shows that you will vote strictly for the D

I voted for Reagan and Bush twice. I have never voted a straight ticket. I still vote for Republican Governors and Congressmen.

Which Democrats have you voted for President?

 

[Maxdeath]

I voted for Reagan and Bush twice. I have never voted a straight ticket. I still vote for Republican Governors and Congressmen.

Which Democrats have you voted for President?

Since you just pretend as if you have a right to know I voted for Carter and even though I ended up regretting it, Clinton.

 

[d0gbreath]

There will not be a trial on the new indictments until after the election. How is that interference?

 

[Chillicothe]

Reported today:

"Smith brought the superseding indictment after presenting the case to a second grand jury — a different set of at least 16 citizens from those who originally heard evidence in the case before charges were filed last August.

That marks the second time that a group of jurors has heard evidence about Trump’s actions to block the transfer of power and concluded charges were warranted."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At least 32 people have heard and seen the evidence.

They felt the charges were warranted.
Thus, we had the first series of indictments, and then a second.

Consequences come.
So does karma.

 

[The Duke]

Consequences come.
So does karma.

That it does.

 

[BackAgain]

Unless Meritless Garland revises his order purportedly appointing Smith as a special persecutor, based on actually existing legal authority to do so, Garland’s supposed authorization to allow Smith to file a superseding indictment is meaningless.

 

[Independent thinker]

If any had any doubt what a miserable partisan hack Garland is, that doubt was washed away today.

Hell, the DOJ has a 90-day rule, no indictments within 90 days of an election, violated their own rule.

1. Election interference, big time, by Reichsleiter Merrick Garland (who had to approve this). This is so obvious that it will likely gain Trump hundreds of thousands of votes in the next few days (early voting begins in some states next week).

2. Seems to be a violation of the laches doctrine and I expect Trump attorneys to move to dismiss because of laches, and whatever Chutkin does will go to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, then back to SCOTUS.

That is how worried the Democrats are.

They are all on team Get Trump.