Merchan stands firm on hush money case.

Because he conspired with Cohen and Pecker PRIOR to the transaction to evade federal election law.

That conspiracy - prior to the NDA - shows that the participants new they were breaking the law. And Pecker, part of the original conspiracy backed out and told them why PRIOR to the NDA when his own lawyers said he was putting himself in criminal jeopardy when they (the lawyers) found out.

There was zero testimony that anyone knew they were violating FEC law, let alone that Trump knew it.
Those that paid attention know this was covered at trial.

WW
Too bad you weren't paying attention
 
So does Congress. They use taxpayer money to hide their sex crimes.

Charge them under whatever the applicable federal law is.

But wanna bet the Congress exempted themselves from the applicability of such a law? (If there is a federal law.)

WW
 
There was zero testimony that anyone knew they were violating FEC law, let alone that Trump knew it.

Too bad you weren't paying attention

That's false.

To bad you didn't pay attention to Pecker's testimony.

WW
 
Just more lawfare. There was plenty of collusion. Betcha we'll hear from Fani Willis on that point. Either we'll hear from her or she'll be disbarred. Not looking good for Dem lawfare at this point.
You're all over the place. Willis handles his RICO case
 
Because he conspired with Cohen and Pecker PRIOR to the transaction to evade federal election law.

That conspiracy - prior to the NDA - shows that the participants new they were breaking the law. And Pecker, part of the original conspiracy backed out and told them why PRIOR to the NDA when his own lawyers said he was putting himself in criminal jeopardy when they (the lawyers) found out.

Those that paid attention know this was covered at trial.

WW
So they conspired illegally to accomplish something that’s legal!?????
Do you all ever listen to yourselves ?
 
PURE UNADULTERATED BULLSHIT

President Trump called former FEC Commissioner to testify >>>>>>WHY<<<<< did corrupt Biased "judge" Merchan refused to allow his testimony ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?


Former President Trump’s legal team was slated to call on a former commissioner of the Federal Election Commission to testify in the NY v. Trump case, but the expert’s testimony was not heard after the presiding judge curbed the scope of what he could discuss before the jury.

"Judge Merchan has so restricted my testimony that defense has decided not to call me. Now, it’s elementary that the judge instructs the jury on the law, so I understand his reluctance," former FEC Commissioner Bradley Smith posted on X on Monday.


The Former FEC Commissioner was going to testify that the FEC’s policy that expenses that exist “irrespective” of a candidacy are not deemed to be campaign expenditures and thus not a violation of campaign finance law. But the prosecution and Merchan could allow that.

More reversible error.
 
The Former FEC Commissioner was going to testify that the FEC’s policy that expenses that exist “irrespective” of a candidacy are not deemed to be campaign expenditures and thus not a violation of campaign finance law. But the prosecution and Merchan could allow that.

More reversible error.
Truth telling that early would have doused the witch hunting
 
Chairman Jordan Investigates Justice Department Coordination with Alvin Bragg's Politicized Prosecution
April 30, 2024
Press Release

Matthew Colangelo, a former senior Biden Justice Department official, is leading the political prosecution of President Trump with Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland demanding documents and information about the Biden Department of Justice's (DOJ) coordination with New York County District Attorney (DANY) Attorney Alvin Bragg and his politicized prosecution of President Donald J. Trump. Matthew Colangelo, a former senior DOJ official, is a lead prosecutor for Bragg and the case centers on testimony from a convicted felon who had been previously prosecuted by the Justice Department.

Since last year, popularly elected prosecutors—who campaigned for office on the promise of prosecuting President Trump—engaged in an unprecedented abuse of prosecutorial authority: the indictment of a former President of the United States and current leading candidate for that office. Given the perception that the Biden DOJ is assisting in Bragg's politicized prosecution, the Committee is seeking to further understand the scope of Colangelo's employment and his obsession with investigating President Trump.



What do you know?
 
the testimony given by ALL PARTIES have stated that Trump didn't do anything....he is not guilty.
Lie.

The evidence of guilt was overwhelming. Several key witnesses also testified to Trump's guilt.
 
We'll find out. She's on the hook now. She either talks or loses her license.
She isn't in any danger. Prosecutors are allowed.to talk to each other and even coordinate the.timing of their prosecutions.
 
She isn't in any danger. Prosecutors are allowed.to talk to each other and even coordinate the.timing of their prosecutions.
lol

The Dems are broke. I doubt they can buy her enough bling to keep her silent.
 
Back
Top Bottom