Men and Women are just social constructs.

[AzogtheDefiler]

Since Libs believe that men and women are the same and athletes should be paid the same. US women’s hockey team should play the men’s team. Winner take all.

Fair?

 

[LibertyWeeps]

Wonder why they haven't already been putting mens teams against womens teams.

I'd watch that, and I hate sports.

 

[candycorn]

Since Libs believe that men and women are the same and athletes should be paid the same. US women’s hockey team should play the men’s team. Winner take all.

Fair?

Ahh, on drugs again I see.

What the womens' teams have stated is that when they are representing the nation, the pay should be the same since the job is...playing a sport to represent the nation. Same labor should be the same pay.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Ahh, on drugs again I see.

What the womens' teams have stated is that when they are representing the nation, the pay should be the same since the job is...playing a sport to represent the nation. Same labor should be the same pay.

A bricklayer is a harder job than that of an attorney. Lol

It’s not labor it’s the difficulty in attaining such a role

In this case it’s the ratings. Men get higher ratings and it was based on World Cup soccer so be precise. Always a liar you are.

 

[candycorn]

A bricklayer is a harder job than that of an attorney. Lol

Not even remotely true.

It’s not labor it’s the difficulty in attaining such a role

LOL...sure! Nobody argued differently.

But since you're bringing it up, a forward for the women's team and the a forward on the men's team have the same job...the ice isn't larger or smaller, the puck is the same size, the goal is the same size....

The forward on each team had to make the team...it wasn't awarded.

One could argue that it was actually more difficult for the female player since they are often not the beneficiaries of playing on ESPN and thus are less well known to coaches.

In this case it’s the ratings. Men get higher ratings and it was based on World Cup soccer so be precise.

So according to your logic, the engineering crew that works on the upcoming Artemis launch going to moon should make more than the guys who launch satellites because more people are tuning in to the moon launch?

Ratings don't matter when you're representing the nation in tournaments like the Olympics. The IOC isn't offering prize money based on what the teams did for the "league" so to speak.

 

[LibertyWeeps]

Ahh, on drugs again I see.

What the womens' teams have stated is that when they are representing the nation, the pay should be the same since the job is...playing a sport to represent the nation. Same labor should be the same pay.

Womens hockey ticket sales are $10 - $100.
Mens hockey ticket sales are $100 - $300.

 

[DukeU]

Womens hockey ticket sales are $10 - $100.
Mens hockey ticket sales are $100 - $300.

Down goes Frazier.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Not even remotely true.

LOL...sure! Nobody argued differently.

But since you're bringing it up, a forward for the women's team and the a forward on the men's team have the same job...the ice isn't larger or smaller, the puck is the same size, the goal is the same size....

The forward on each team had to make the team...it wasn't awarded.

One could argue that it was actually more difficult for the female player since they are often not the beneficiaries of playing on ESPN and thus are less well known to coaches.


So according to your logic, the engineering crew that works on the upcoming Artemis launch going to moon should make more than the guys who launch satellites because more people are tuning in to the moon launch?

Ratings don't matter when you're representing the nation in tournaments like the Olympics. The IOC isn't offering prize money based on what the teams did for the "league" so to speak.

It wasn’t about the Olympics it was about the World Cup. No one said Olympian men should make more.

And again stick to the topic. If gender is a social construct then have the men play the women. What would the score be? Hmmmm

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Not even remotely true.

LOL...sure! Nobody argued differently.

But since you're bringing it up, a forward for the women's team and the a forward on the men's team have the same job...the ice isn't larger or smaller, the puck is the same size, the goal is the same size....

The forward on each team had to make the team...it wasn't awarded.

One could argue that it was actually more difficult for the female player since they are often not the beneficiaries of playing on ESPN and thus are less well known to coaches.


So according to your logic, the engineering crew that works on the upcoming Artemis launch going to moon should make more than the guys who launch satellites because more people are tuning in to the moon launch?

Ratings don't matter when you're representing the nation in tournaments like the Olympics. The IOC isn't offering prize money based on what the teams did for the "league" so to speak.

Moon launch isn’t a sport. False conflation. And you have never laid brick. It’s laborious, not many 65 yr olds could do it. Many if not all 65 yr old attorneys still easily practice.

Wow you really are very stupid

 

[candycorn]

It wasn’t about the Olympics it was about the World Cup.

Ahh my bad. Point remains though; you're representing the nation. They are the US National Teams

No one said Olympian men should make more.

And again stick to the topic. If gender is a social construct then have the men play the women. What would the score be? Hmmmm

Oh I think I made my point....

PS: Earlier you said the topic was "ratings"

In this case it’s the ratings

See, stupid? You can't even stick to the point of your own thread.

 

[22lcidw]

Ahh, on drugs again I see.

What the womens' teams have stated is that when they are representing the nation, the pay should be the same since the job is...playing a sport to represent the nation. Same labor should be the same pay.

Not true. However, if you pay for a sports network to watch on TV you are paying for women's sports. You can sugarcoat it all you want. There is a reason a few decades ago and there still may be, there was midnight basketball in some cities. Designed to help keep the violence down for males. I know I cannot do what we see many women do in the Olympics as we just saw. And there is possible one or two they do better. However, males that train or play are better. Paying premium for minor league is a rip off.

 

[sparky]

women weren't created to do everything a men can......they were created to do what we can't......~S~

 

[candycorn]

Womens hockey ticket sales are $10 - $100.
Mens hockey ticket sales are $100 - $300.

So?

 

[candycorn]

Moon launch isn’t a sport. False conflation.

Actually it's right on the money.

Both are organized by national agencies...NASA, USOC, US Soccer, etc...

And you have never laid brick. It’s laborious, not many 65 yr olds could do it. Many if not all 65 yr old attorneys still easily practice.

Wow you really are very stupid

Well, the next time you get arrested have a bricklayer defend you...deal?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Ahh my bad. Point remains though; you're representing the nation. They are the US National Teams

Oh I think I made my point....

PS: Earlier you said the topic was "ratings"


See, stupid? You can't even stick to the point of your own thread.

So it was your bad. No one cares about the Women’s World Cup. Men’s tickets and they are in Boston this year are astronomical. Supply/Demand economics

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Actually it's right on the money.

Both are organized by national agencies...NASA, USOC, US Soccer, etc...


Well, the next time you get arrested have a bricklayer defend you...deal?

That’s not the point and the next time will be the first time and you still haven’t answered the question in the OP. Why not let the teams play!? What’s your score prediction? Lol

 

[candycorn]

So it was your bad. No one cares about the Women’s World Cup. Men’s tickets and they are in Boston this year are astronomical. Supply/Demand economics

So now it’s back to ratings?

A few moments ago, it was this weird battle of the sexes you’ve dreamed up because you feel inadequate as a male. Whats the matter?

The WNT point is that they do the same job as the men. Which they do. They play for US Soccer. They represent the nation when they do. And in the case of the WNT...they often get much farther in the World Cup tourney than the men ever dream of. How are the Mens’ ratings when they’re not even playing....hmmm?

As for the viewership...The 2019 Women’s World Cup where the UWNT won it all....

About as many as watched the MLB All Star game a few months back.

The previous year (2018) had the men’s world cup. Sinceit’s all about ratings again....Tell us...how were the ratings for the USMNT in the tourntament....would you please?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

So now it’s back to ratings?

A few moments ago, it was this weird battle of the sexes you’ve dreamed up because you feel inadequate as a male. Whats the matter?

The WNT point is that they do the same job as the men. Which they do. They play for US Soccer. They represent the nation when they do. And in the case of the WNT...they often get much farther in the World Cup tourney than the men ever dream of. How are the Mens’ ratings when they’re not even playing....hmmm?

As for the viewership...The 2019 Women’s World Cup where the UWNT won it all....

View attachment 1222501
About as many as watched the MLB All Star game a few months back.

The previous year (2018) had the men’s world cup. Sinceit’s all about ratings again....Tell us...how were the ratings for the USMNT in the tourntament....would you please?

Another dodge

Why not let the teams play?

Men’s sports get higher ratings, hence the higher ticket prices and higher comp. It’s that simple. Supply/Demand economics.

Libs can’t define what a woman is but want women to be paid as much as men. Where would the money come from when tickets are way cheaper so they generate less revenue, you’re just trolling now,

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

So now it’s back to ratings?

A few moments ago, it was this weird battle of the sexes you’ve dreamed up because you feel inadequate as a male. Whats the matter?

The WNT point is that they do the same job as the men. Which they do. They play for US Soccer. They represent the nation when they do. And in the case of the WNT...they often get much farther in the World Cup tourney than the men ever dream of. How are the Mens’ ratings when they’re not even playing....hmmm?

As for the viewership...The 2019 Women’s World Cup where the UWNT won it all....

View attachment 1222501
About as many as watched the MLB All Star game a few months back.

The previous year (2018) had the men’s world cup. Sinceit’s all about ratings again....Tell us...how were the ratings for the USMNT in the tourntament....would you please?

Now compare it to the Men’s World Cup

Apples to Apples or a World Series game not an exhibition game. LOL

Man you’re still one stupid lib

 

[Lockback]

Since Libs believe that men and women are the same and athletes should be paid the same. US women’s hockey team should play the men’s team. Winner take all.

Fair?

Oh, I would so love that.