"The kind of person who hates gays..."
The Left attempts to cast the argument is pejorative terms, as above....Alinsky?
What about those who simply believe that each state has the right to define marriage, as per Article I, section 8 of the Constitution.
BTW..."Despite what many in the media claim, the American people do not support same-sex marriage. Every time they have voted on marriage—32 states overall—they have voted to preserve traditional marriage."
State by State, Americans Don't Want Gay Marriage | Debate Club | US News Opinion
Yet, Leftists such as you will never consider the wishes of the citizenry. There is always coercion from the Left.
The wishes of the citizenry has to be balanced by the rights of everyone.
Otherwise Democracy just becomes an excercise in two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.
I wasn't talking about the legal issues at all. I was talking purely about the moral issue.
If you are a well-adjusted straight person, two gays getting married has absolutely no effect on your life whatsoever. Period.
So the only reason to be opposed to the last thing that they haven't won in public opinion yet is hate.
"oooh, please let me have this last little bit of legal discrimination. Please. Pretty Please. My Sky Pixie says so!"
Because everyone agrees that they shouldn't be denied jobs or housing or any other right or privilage you enjoy.
1. "So the only reason to be opposed..."
The assumption in your post, both written and implied, is that you have some knowledge of what every person thinks, and feels.
This is absurd.
The wishes of the elite, and the supposed wishes of the minority in question should not dictate the course of events.
2. If there is a presumption of liberty in the Constitution, if not in the text, it is at least in the reading of the Ninth Amendment. Or, one would have to argue that the original meaning of the Constitution fits more closely with a presumption of serfdom.
The presumption of liberty fits with the Ninth Amendment, which says that the enumeration in the Constitution of certain or specific rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The liberty of the people can also be inferred from the fact that the powers that serve as the foundation of the Constitution are enumerated and thus limited by implication. And,
anything not granted remains a right of the people.
From chapter ten of “Originalism: A Quarter-Century of Debate,’ Steven G. Calabresi
I believe that the definition of marriage would be the right of the people. No state in this country has every voted to change the definition of marriage.
3. We know from the Declaration of Independence that a precept of our order is that it is
the people who must consent to governance.